[RD] The Alt-Right and White Supremacism (from Clown Car II)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, yes, but then again rich black people aren't discriminated against either, which would connote that the issue is mostly one of social class/money, not of skin colour.
Let alone that poor people are far more numerous than black people.

I don't think that anyone argues that a poor white person is met with open arms.
 
I am not seeing how 'white supremacism' can even exist outside of some very distinctly germanic-north euro setting, cause it isn't as if most of Europe is of one 'race' (assuming one identifies distinct races). So the term itself is misleading, cause it isn't about 'white' people, but some subgroup. Neither latin, nor greek, slavic or other groups are germanic, while they are white (another over-group anyway). Let alone that some euro 'ethnic groups' are asian (finnish and hungric, for example), and others are (at least nominally) steppe (bulgarian).
I don't think Americans fret over these sorts of fine gradations. I don't think that most Europeans do, either. Certainly a homogeneously "white" Europe is rarely maintained in practice, but I don't think there's much mileage in citing the categories of nineteenth century race theorists who even racists who mostly accepted as discredited or at least irrelevant. The contemporary focus is on broad biological sweeps, with the nitty-gritty attributed instead to divergent "cultures".

Well, yes, but then again rich black people aren't discriminated either, which would connote that the issue is mostly one of social class/money, not of skin colour.
Wealthy black people are still frequently discriminated against, it's simply that the discrimination tends to be of less material consequence. To the extent that they are free from discrimination, that's at least in part because the kinds of contexts in which black people are permitted to become wealthy are those which are more welcoming to black people to start with. Race and class structure each other, they don't cancel each other out, one way or the other.

Put bluntly, when black Americans are disproportionately passed over for employment and education while enthusiastically singled out for police harassment and incarceration, it is absurd to tell them "but if you were rich, this wouldn't happen, so it must just be a class thing".
 
This isn't actually a contradiction of what I've said. You're just quibbling the appropriateness of the term "white supremacist", not its moral or political content. You've conceded that this person is white supremacist-adjacent, even that they may be espousing an implicit white supremacism- and is that fine distinction really worth the argument? Is McCarthy herself worth the argument?

No I haven't. All I inferred is that it looks like she's part of the Alt-Right and probably reads Breitbart.

But if this woman has made it very clearly that she is comfortable reproducing white supremacist talking points, in advancing the political goals espoused by white supremacists, that she is not ashamed or embarrassed by the association, then she has very clearly picked a side, and there is no tactical misstep and making that clear. The American electorate, God love 'em, are just about smart enough that most of them will appreciate that.

What has she specifically said that's espousing white supremacy? That's what I want to know because so far you're labeling this person as someone who's already picked a side and has decided that she is a white supremacist with no evidence other than some 2nd or 3rd degree guilty by association.
 
Well, yes, but then again rich black people aren't discriminated against either, which would connote that the issue is mostly one of social class/money, not of skin colour.

Mostly, but not exclusively. Sure, rich black people have it tougher than poor white people, but they still face some racism, and middle class black people will face more discrimination than middle class white people and are more likely to be approached by a cop with his finger on the trigger and end up in a snuff video on the news.
 
Last edited:
No I haven't. All I inferred is that it looks like she's part of the Alt-Right and probably reads Breitbart.
Is there a difference between appearing white supremacist-adjacent and actually being white supremacist-adjacent? Unless she's in a deep undercover position that's gotten somehow out of hand...?

What has she specifically said that's espousing white supremacy? That's what I want to know because so far you're labeling this person as someone who's already picked a side and has decided that she is a white supremacist which no evidence other than some 2nd or 3rd degree guilty by association.
You yourself have already shown us:

Spoiler :
iw5jdv.jpg

zj80ev.png

2wqg4yx.png

These are not innocent conservative talking points, this is not "Hitler ate sugar": these are white supremacist talking points, reproduce without qualification or criticism. If your requirement for identifying a racist is an explicit declaration "I love racism and being racist", then this anxiety about guilt-by-association is going to leave any attempt to coordinate an anti-racist movement strangled in the cradle.
 
Oh, come on !
"Black lives matter" started in reaction to black people still being murdered by cops. When and why did the phrase "white lives matter" crop up ? Are white people being killed disproportionally by American police ? Are white people subjected to profiling ? I think not. It started as a reaction to black lives matter. It's not a reaction to oppression, it's a reaction to another's group protest against oppression and I can't fathom that there's any other motive but racism behind this.

Perhaps the phrase "white lives matter" is a reaction to "black lives matter," but I still fail to see how that makes it a white supremacist catch phrase.

Now, a lot of white people have legitimate grievances and are being oppressed and discriminated against, White women, white poor people, white gay people and so on, but they aren't discriminated because they are white, but because they're female/poor/gay.
Focusing on the one trait that isn't a disadvantage (and one that a homeless person might have in common with a billionaire) is pretty skeevy.

I haven't heard of this person until yesterday, so all I know about her is what's on her twitter feed and if you take a look at it she posts a lot of things along the lines of what's below:

149ttol.jpg

71kxsh.png


None of these kinds of posts are espousing white supremacy - the idea that the white race is superior to all other races - so I'm curious as to why some are so eager to label her as a white supremacist. To me, she seems to believe that white people are facing an existential threat that is tied up with culture and immigration. I haven't seen anything where she's saying that white people are a superior race.
 
Last edited:
Is there a difference between appearing white supremacist-adjacent and actually being white supremacist-adjacent? Unless she's in a deep undercover position that's gotten somehow out of hand...?

"Appearing white supremacist-adjacent"...? :shifty: What does this even mean? And how is it somehow exactly the same as being a white supremacist?

This seems like a whole lot of guilt by 2 or 3 degrees of association.


These are not innocent conservative talking points, this is not "Hitler ate sugar": these are white supremacist talking points, reproduce without qualification or criticism. If your requirement for identifying a racist is an explicit declaration "I love racism and being racist", then this anxiety about guilt-by-association is going to leave any attempt to coordinate an anti-racist movement strangled in the cradle.

Can you please explain HOW her posts, taking points, what have you, are espousing white supremacy?

I'm not asking for a signed confession from her where she states in wiring that she's a racist (which still isn't the same thing as being a white supremacist) - I'm asking if you can show me evidence of her espousing white supremacy before you jump to conclusions and label her as a white supremacist.
 
I haven't heard of this person until yesterday, so all I know about her is what's on her twitter feed and if you take a look at it she posts a lot of things along the lines of what's below:

149ttol.jpg

71kxsh.png


None of these kinds of posts are espousing white supremacy - the idea that the white race is superior to all other races - so I'm curious as to why some are so eager to label her as a white supremacist. To me, she seems to be believe that white people are facing an existential threat that is tied up with culture and immigration. I haven't seen anything where she's saying that white people are a superior race.
Both of these points represent boilerplate white supremacist tropes, presented without criticism or qualification. Even more so than your previous post! They may not be explicit calls for white political and social supremacy- but when has that been the line? As I said, do you expect people to openly identify as "racist" before we are prepared to identify themselves as such? Even segregationists weren't willing to state their bigotry that explicitly. Their battle-cry was always "separate but equal", remember?

Nobody expect white supremacists believes that white people are under thread of genocide. Nobody believes that white people are being prevented from preserving or celebrating their culture except white supremacists. Repeating these bogus conspiracy theories is every bit flying the flag for white supremacy as much as talking about the "Zionist World Government". If, to borrow your own phrasing, it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, but you insist on leaving room for the possibility that it might actually be a goose until it voluntarily identifies itself to us as a duck- how do you expect that we might ever find a duck?

The second imagine is doubly offensive because British white supremacists hate the Irish and the tricolour, and are as they have always been fully intent on wiping our "people, heritage and culture" from the face of the earth. If you're gonna be a goddam fascist Nazi pig, at least try to be a self-aware goddam fascist Nazi pig, ferchrissake. And triply offensive because I'm fairly sure that the poor girl in the photograph didn't expect to be used as a propaganda piece by some weird self-loathing Yankee. It's just a complete car-crash of a post, is what I'm getting at.
 
This premise is completely incorrect, which is why the conclusions you are drawing from it are also incorrect.

I am not saying they aren't potentially discriminated against, yet surely a poor person of whatever race will in most cases which matter be faced with more discrimination. Now in very particular context (eg USA police dealing with person x) i can infer this may not be true at all. But you should keep in mind that not all discussion has to be about the US!
 
They may not be explicit calls for white political and social supremacy- but when has that been the line? As I said, do you expect people to openly identify as "racist" before we are prepared to identify themselves as such? Even segregationists weren't willing to state their bigotry that explicitly. Their battle-cry was always "separate but equal", remember?

This is my point. None of these statements are explicitly white supremacist statements. That doesn't mean she still couldn't be a racist, or a white supremacist (which are two different things), but we don't know that for sure and if you're going to make that serious of an accusation about someone's character you better have some evidence.

All we know about her is what's on her twitter feed and that she clearly has grievances with globalization and the immigration system and if that's your litmus test for if someone is a white supremacist it's a bad one.

If, to borrow your own phrasing, it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, but you insist on leaving room for the possibility that it might actually be a goose until it voluntarily identifies itself to us as a duck- how do you expect that we might ever find a duck?

The issue I'm having with your accusations about her is that you're unable to clearly define what the characteristics are of this "duck." You're using the term "white supremacist" in an extremely broad sense.


Nobody expect white supremacists believes that white people are under thread of genocide. Nobody believes that white people are being prevented from preserving or celebrating their culture except white supremacists.

You're jumping to conclusions and making broad generalizations again. You don't know what's in other people's heads, or what their motivation are unless they've said so publicly.

The second imagine is doubly offensive because British white supremacists hate the Irish and the tricolour, and are as they have always been fully intent on wiping our "people, heritage and culture" from the face of the earth.

I thought you just said that only white supremacists hold these sorts of opinions? How is what you just said all that different from what she is saying on her twitter feed? If you could think that about Irish people without being an "Irish Supremacist" why couldn't she think the same about white people?
 
Last edited:
Well, yes, but then again rich black people aren't discriminated against either, which would connote that the issue is mostly one of social class/money, not of skin colour.
Let alone that poor people are far more numerous than black people.

I don't think that anyone argues that a poor white person is met with open arms.

Of course rich black people face discrimination and racism. It's completely ridiculous to claim that they don't.

Phillip Thompson lives in an exclusive gated community with a golf course in one of the wealthiest exurbs of Washington, D.C. Inside his spacious home, African artwork decorates the walls alongside framed pictures of his children's high school graduation and an American flag by the front entrance.

He is a retired lieutenant colonel in the Marine Corps, a Gulf War veteran and a lawyer with his own practice. But when Thompson, 55, moved to his Leesburg, Va., neighborhood 12 years ago, many of his mostly white neighbors made assumptions about how he could afford his house.

"You couldn't have gotten here on your guile, on your knowledge, on being capable. I had to be a football player," Thompson said.

I just play into it, like no, I'm a rapper or I'm a pimp. I'm a retired pimp. I'm going to play on your stereotypes because then it makes you look even stupider.

Phillip Thompson

Thompson, who is also president of his local NAACP chapter, has a sharp retort to those questions he felt were meant to size him up about his worthiness of being in this well-off neighborhood.

"I just play into it, like no, I'm a rapper or I'm a pimp. I'm a retired pimp," Thompson deadpanned. "I'm going to play on your stereotypes because then it makes you look even stupider."

It is a widely-held notion that for many African-Americans who have "made it" — those who earn a good salary, live in a neighborhood with good schools and low crime, that maybe, just maybe, being the target of discrimination would be minimized.

A new poll, by NPR, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health surveyed more than 800 African-Americans and found that for prosperous blacks, money does not shield them from bigotry.

Thompson's wife, Tanja, said discrimination plays out in subtle ways.

"Even living here in a gated community, there's definitely racism," she said. She is a former senior master sergeant in the Air Force and now works as a mediator in the federal government.


"You see people, maybe in a professional setting, but when you see them in the street, they turn the other direction. And then ... they wonder, 'Why are you here? Or how did you get here?' "

The survey found more than half of African-Americans overall say they have personally experienced slurs or that someone has made negative assumptions about them because of their race.

But when broken down by income, of blacks folks who are high earners — those making $75,000 a year or more — 65 percent say they were the target of racial slurs compared with 40 percent of blacks who make $25,000 or less.

High-income African-Americans outpaced their lower-income counterparts once again on the issue of people making negative assumptions about them, 73 percent and 45 percent respectively.

We're not just going to solve this problem by having more black college graduates.

Robert Blendon

"The numbers are just staggering in the share of people who report sometime in their life they were discriminated against because of their race or they were treated very unfairly, and that is significant," said Robert Blendon, professor of health policy at Harvard's School of Public Health and who worked on the study.

"We're not just going to solve this problem by having more black college graduates," he said.

Tanja Thompson has her theories about why high-income African-Americans may face more discrimination.

"When you make $75,000 or more, $100,000, you are dealing with more educated individuals and probably moreso people who don't look like you," Thompson said.

Algernon Austin is an economist at the think tank Demos and the author of the book America Is Not Post-Racial.

"I think what sometimes people miss is, what are the comparisons?"

He points out that college-educated and high-earning black folks are in many ways more likely to be better off than black people who earn less.

But Austin, who did not work on NPR's poll, adds there is overwhelming data showing that when comparing educated and high-earning blacks to their white counterparts, the gap is substantial.

"The college-educated whites are going to have significantly more wealth, going to be less likely unemployed, they're moving further in terms of their careers," he said, "So in that comparison, what African-Americans see, reinforces the sense of inequality in American society."

It's a sense shared by Phillip Thompson.

"I should probably be in a better position. I think if I were a white guy, I'd be in a better position."

http://www.npr.org/2017/10/24/55969...ld-prosperous-blacks-from-bigotry-survey-says
 
This is my point. None of these statements are explicitly white supremacist statements. That doesn't mean she still couldn't be a racist, or a white supremacist (which are two different things), but we don't know that for sure and if you're going to make that serious of an accusation about someone's character you better have some evidence.

Problem with this statement is that they are in fact explicitly white supremacist statements. These statements have literally no existence outside of the white supremacist movement.
 
Of course rich black people face discrimination and racism. It's completely ridiculous to claim that they don't.



http://www.npr.org/2017/10/24/55969...ld-prosperous-blacks-from-bigotry-survey-says

Hm, are you sure you are legitimately responding to my post? ;)

I fear that US posters tend to go all hystrionic when any nuanced post on this is made. If it comes to that you may not view "black people" as solely referring to black people in the US, cause half the posters here aren't from the US anyway so don't have said context in mind.
 
It's pretty obvious that rich black people face discrimination based on their skin color while they live in white majority countries, but at the same time, on average a rich black person will experience far less overall discrimination than a white, poor person, because class is about the strongest factor of discrimination there is.

More generally, being in the minority of anything will cause you to have a harder time than being in the majority.

Intersectionality!
 
Intersectionality!

What is this term? And please explain how it's either black or white. I need to decide if it's absolutely awful, or something that needs of my blind and unyielding support.
 
What is this term? And please explain how it's either black or white. I need to decide if it's absolutely awful, or something that needs of my blind and unyielding support.
civver, darling, you really just have to google it.
 
Nobody except white supremacists believes that white people are under thread of genocide.

That's a rather broad proclamation. I do find it odd that you're comfortable saying stuff like that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom