The GOP plan to block your vote

Murky

Deity
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
7,216
Location
The Milky Way Galaxy
Republicans across the nation are working hard to make casting a ballot in 2012 harder than ever

If you are a member of a racial minority, student or young voter, working poor, elderly or disabled, your ability to vote may be a lot harder in 2012 — especially if you live in states that have a history of racial repression during the Civil Rights Movement. Simply put, the Republican Party knows which segments of society helped to elect President Obama and other Democrats in 2008, knows tens of millions of these people did not vote in the 2010 midterms, and has worked very hard to stop these people from voting again next year.

Their strategy has been simple: raise the barriers by complicating the rules to register to vote, to get a ballot, to vote early or speedily. What follows are seven major trends that will affect you if you live in a state with new rules. Republicans know that most people do not pay attention to the fine print of election law. They get excited in the final days before presidential votes. But that may not be good enough in 2012.
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/22/the_gop_plan_to_block_your_vote/

This is a travesty and an outrage. Who do they think they are?
 
They've been doing this for many years. And we've been complaining about it as long. Voter suppression is the only real type of voter fraud in the US. Has been for a long time.
 
GOP and Republicans being morally unethical? Say it ain't so.

It happened in Bush Junior's election and it'll happen again, but you know, Dog-Whistle politics and talk of "Voter Fraud" by Republicans will always overide the reality of what they're actually trying to implement; less black, less hispanic, less asian, less gay and certainly, less democratic votes.
 
I had a post somewhere with links to other voter suppression tactics they had tried, including robocalls saying the polls had closed early (when they hadn't) in neighborhoods that had a majority of Democratic party households.

But yeah, going on for years, same old story.
 
Yeah, like others have said, they've been doing this since the 50s, under the guise of preventing "voter fraud". Their electoral calculus works best at smaller voter turnout models. Luckily, voters in some states, like Maine, have attempted to fight back at some of these stupid laws.
 
OP said:
If you are a member of a racial minority, student or young voter, working poor, elderly or disabled...

:lol: Well, of course the democrats have a right to keep these people whipped on the democratic plantation - and if they vote Republican, as increasing numbers seem to be doing... why, itmustbevotefraud!!!!
 
:lol: Well, of course the democrats have a right to keep these people whipped on the democratic plantation - and if they vote Republican, as increasing numbers seem to be doing... why, itmustbevotefraud!!!!

Why would people vote against their own best interests? :confused:
 
:lol: Well, of course the democrats have a right to keep these people whipped on the democratic plantation - and if they vote Republican, as increasing numbers seem to be doing... why, itmustbevotefraud!!!!

Yeah... that's not what the article is about at all.
 
:lol: Well, of course the democrats have a right to keep these people whipped on the democratic plantation - and if they vote Republican, as increasing numbers seem to be doing... why, itmustbevotefraud!!!!

Wait, racial minorities and college students are voting republican in greater numbers now? When did that happen?

Hispanics, the single fasting growing demographic group in teh US, went from about 50-50 to 65%+ Democratic (more outside of south florida), thanks to GOP immigrant fear mongering. The GOP is suffering from younger voters (another demo they didn't lose that bad before) because of their stance on gay marriage. They absolutely want to keep voter turnout low in these demographics.
 
They've been doing this for many years. And we've been complaining about it as long. Voter suppression is the only real type of voter fraud in the US. Has been for a long time.

Except for all those dead people who routinely vote. Voter reanimation.
 
Except for all those dead people who routinely vote. Voter reanimation.

The Bush Justice Department went after "voter fraud" heavily for 8 years. Found 3 cases. It is not statistically significant enough to measure, much less change an election.
 
Wait till they stop your pets from voting. While the votes of procrastinators are desired, it should be friends and families problem, not the government bending over backwards. Shame on the GOP for pushing the big brother tactics, though, that the Left has procrastinated long enough on.
 
including robocalls

I used to be acquainted with a guy who organized robocall efforts.

A few things I remember from discussions:

Thinks women should stay out of politics.
Big admirer of Jack Abramoff. IIRC played golf with him once!
Anti-gun laws, vehemently anti-ID laws, except where they have to do with immigration or voting.
Will volunteer, seemingly apropos of nothing, that he's not a racist.
Pro-war. Not just Iraq - pretty much any war.
 
This only discriminates against the lazy, no specific groups. I think it should be much harder to vote and the standards should be raised greatly. I worked at a polling station last year. There was a drunk 40 year old who voted for the first time. He later came back and wanted to change his vote since he voted for a party he detested. I asked him why he voted that way and he said I guy outside told him exactly what to and that ended up with him voting for that party.

Is this how countries should be run? How wars should be decided and laws written?
 
This is why there should be compulsory voting in America.

AL DA GREAT, that's one anecdote, whereas there are millions of voters out there.
 
This is why there should be compulsory voting in America.

AL DA GREAT, that's one anecdote, whereas there are millions of voters out there.

Of which many can't find Afghanistan on a map, but they still decide if the country should be bombed or not.

How many of these people actually care? How involved are these people? They don't care at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom