The Multipolar World (MP)

Where are we saying the Templars require punishment? We are saying we understand your desire for retribution, and are noting our position that the Templars should take responsibility for any fallout effects from their actions amongst the legion.

As to whether it is a right action, or moral. Well we make no statement on that.

Oh.

K
 
We just united China. That was our goal. We wish no further expansion. But if Korea and Mongola dont make peace and continue to support the illegal government, we will have to use our army.

Also, i offer PUB OB and a NAP.

1. We're not at war

2. We do support the legal government of China

3. You are not the legal government of China.
 
Actualy, we are at war:

Mongola will hand over one of our Mongolian provinces to Xinjiang, so that it can regain its voting power in the UN - if the government-in-exile will accept, of course.

Mongolia would gleefully join the fight. We may be a washed up, withered husk of a nation, but we have a little bit of fight left in us! The Chinese dogs will wash over our defenses as soon as the main conflict is over, anyways - Mongola may as well lend its support to the cause.
 
He hasn't declared, dummkopf.
 
Saying you would fight somebody doesn't mean you're going to. Yet at least.
 
Actually, by declaring that he supports you openly and that he gives you land, he declares war on us.
 
only if you say it does. If you say it doesn;t then it doesn;t.
 
We wont make any actions against Mongola, but if they keep supporting and giving land to the Red Lotus, we will have to invade.
 
We haven't given anything to anyone - we only offered.
 
Better negotiate with the legal government, us. We offer Mongola OB and a NAP.
 
You aren't the legal government, but we'll accept the NAP anyways.
 
You can say anything you want, as long as you dont declare war or move you armies against us. Also we thank you for accepting the NAP.
 
Korea could make it rain fire in China. You know, huge Chemical arsenal and all that jazz.

Republic and constitutional monarchy are mutually exclusive prospects. Considering you have a monarch, I suspect you simply mean constitutional monarchy ;)

Yes, the correct term would be, "Constitutional monarchy in the framework of a republic." Most of the Commonwealth, for example, are described as "Constitutional monarchies in the framework of a parliamentary republic." Which just means that the state is for all intents and purposes a western democracy, but with a hereditary figurehead at the top. No different than many states' Presidents, except the head of state is monarchic in nature.

Anyway, doing ops now. :p
 
Taniciusfox said:
No different than many states' Presidents
Actually, it's considerably different; at least in terms of the delegation of executive power.

And probably more stable than the American model. :p
 
Actually, it's considerably different; at least in terms of the delegation of executive power.

And probably more stable than the American model. :p

You bet it's more stable! We have a figurehead to like and a Prime Minister to make all the hard decisions and be hated on for it! America tries to lump them together. :crazyeye:

DT
 
China supports the new United Kongo Republic and offers a NAP.

China also offers peace to PUB.
The UKR cannot, in good conscience, accept your support. As soon as a leader not part of the "Doomsday Cadre" is installed, we will talk.

NAP is accepted, however.

The Empire of China, being the legal government of China and having the majority of the Chinese population under its rule, applies to join the Union of Nations.
The Empire of China is NOT, nor will it ever be, the rightful government of China.

You bet it's more stable! We have a figurehead to like and a Prime Minister to make all the hard decisions and be hated on for it! America tries to lump them together. :crazyeye:

DT
No. Just no. :D


Oh, and Tani. Tarkur (I think that's Krzow) is a member of the Neutrality Alliance.
 
Oh, and Tani. Tarkur (I think that's Krzow) is a member of the Neutrality Alliance.
It's Takrur and Krzowwh. :p

JK, Name nazi
 
Actually, it's considerably different; at least in terms of the delegation of executive power.

And probably more stable than the American model. :p

Not really. Most Presidents(in Europe anyway) are figureheads, with the head of government - PM, Chancellor, what have you - being the real power.

Anyway.

===Quebecois Civil War===

PUB deploys 15 armies, 200 ships, and 100 air wings to fight the Quebecois rebels.

Quebec throws 303 vessels at the rebels. The rebels boast 326 of their own.

PUB's forces emerge victorious! They sink 126 British ships and 188 government ships. All rebel ships sunk.

The death toll stands at 652,000 rebel soldiers, 376,000 government soldiers, and 252,000 British soldiers.

With British troops stationed in Quebec, the combined RAF and QAF go against the rebel air wings.

British victory. 43 British air wings and 131 government air wings shot down. All 200 rebel air wings shot down.

In the ensuing carnage, free Quebec's army is destroyed by bombardment. 60,000 civilians perish.

Death toll stands at 338,000 British soldiers, 638,000 government soldiers, 1,112,000 rebel soldiers, 220,000 civilians.

Thanks to PUB's quick actions, a much costlier civil war was prevented. It is revealed the Lancers financed the uprising.

===NCSA Civil War===

The 501st sends 90 ships to destroy the NCSA fleet. They are repelled. All 501st ships are sunk, as are 119 NCSA ships.

Fortunately, the rebels still have one advantage - the rebel air armada.

86 501st air wings fly wing to wing with 452 rebels. Success! All 250 government air wings shot down. 36 501st air wings shot down; 131 rebel air wings shot down.

50 501st air wings and 300 rebel air wings commence bombardment. 80 attempts later, the NCSA military is destroyed. The death toll stands at 256,000 501st, 908,000 NCSA, 280,000 rebels; 430,000 civilians. The soldiers shoot down 2 501st air wings and 9 rebel air wings.

The rebels seize control of the government with the aid of 501st ground troopers. They pledge allegiance to the 501st and vow to support them in their own civil war.

===Hungarian Civil War===

Rather than waste blood, Italy just deploys a spy brigade to coup the rebels to its side.

The spies are successful. The rebel government is liquidated and a pro-unification one put in power. The Hungarian Civil War ends without a single shot fired besides the first.
 
Most of the Commonwealth, for example,

Not really. Most Presidents(in Europe anyway) are figureheads, with the head of government - PM, Chancellor, what have you - being the real power.

You're muddling up your examples. Europe is neither largely commonwealth nor largely constitutional monarchies. :rolleyes:

DT
 
Back
Top Bottom