Yeah, evolution isn't the Highlander.
I agree. But where does it come from? The sources I have seen, claim volcanic and solar activity are the 2 biggest sources of carbon-14 within our solar system, but that supernova explosions produce more carbon-14 in a few seconds than either of the other sources. If that is true, we have a problem, which manifests itself, as you say...
You are assuming:
a) the Vela supernova did indeed explode 13,000 years ago, and
b) God created the universe less than 13,000 years ago (which the Bible doesn't say)
So a few milligrams or atoms of carbon means the sample is reported as a maximum of 60,000 years. My point is, why are even a few milligrams of carbon found in fossils that are 630,000,000 years old (pre-Cambrian on the geologic time scale)- much much older than the half-life of carbon-14? There shouldn't even be any carbon-14 in those samples!
Not really, I wanna see what books they are from.Peek here:
http://www2.ncseweb.org/wp/
Scroll down to "NCSE Kitzmiller v. Dover Legal Documents Archive" to get to http://www2.ncseweb.org/kvd/
Go to /img
That's where the files are from. Does that count?
Wasn't one of the pieces of evidence in the Dover case an earlier version of a document distributed by the Discovery Institute that described 'Intelligent Design' where the words 'Intelligent Design' were still 'Creationism'.
Pandas and People.Not really, I wanna see what books they are from.
Then this is officially the most stupid debate ever. Well, probably not the most stupid, but right stupid as compared to most arguments.Perfection said:Here's my claims:
1. Evolution is a valid scientific claim
2. Creationism is not a valid scientific claim
The thread series was started when there was a significant debate in the forums on the topic. I reframed the debate so it was within the parameters of science so that people would see the scientific merits of evolution and the lack of Creationist rigor. I wouldn't characterize that as a stupid.Then this is officially the most stupid debate ever. Well, probably not the most stupid, but right stupid as compared to most arguments.
I'll answer the challenge, such as it is. Evolution is science and Creationism is not. Perfection wins :roll eyes:
So what will be your next victory, Perfection? Proving the Earth is round?
Even in the limited scope of these forums that is easy enough to demonstrate. When Perfection became frustrated at people criticizing her political favorite, she ran right for the familiar special pleading that so many theists seems to favor.
"But Bush is a good dude!" She kept blurting out. Turns out "Bush is a good dude" was merely a faith belief, at least it was for her.
So you're saying that because I probably believe in some thing that I shouldn't or is based too much on emotional attachment or whatever I can't criticize other people's beliefs?My point is simple: We all believe in things we don't know to be true. In the sense of religious belief, or the various non-religious metaphysical beliefs of certain atheists, most people probably have the same experience. We just choose to believe in different fantastic things.
Yeah, like if given enough time pigs can grow wings and fly as the big multi-ton dinosaur did. What some call science other call miracles.We just choose to believe in different fantastic things.
Like a politician (free health care!?! yeah right!) evolutionist try to talk around the fact that what they are describing would take a miracle.You don't seriously believe evolution supports that statement do you?
Like a politician (free health care!?! yeah right!) evolutionist try to talk around the fact that what they are describing would take a miracle.