Reno
The Studio Ghibli Fanatic
So the Finns are very quick to point out that his swastikas have nothing to do with Nazism.
And i repeat it still doesn't.

So the Finns are very quick to point out that his swastikas have nothing to do with Nazism.
And I agree.Reno said:And i repeat it still doesn't.![]()
Johann MacLeod said:is it still a cross if it has 3 beams? Is it a cross if its two diagonal lines? is it a cross if it has a circle in it? yes!! its a reletivly simple varition considering how widely dispersed the symbol was.
It's still a 'tau'-cross.Kafka2 said:Take a crucifix. Remove one of the points, then turn it upside-down, so it now resembles an inverted "T". To reverse the symbolic meaning, replace the Jesus figure with Ronald McDonald. Instead of having him crucified, have him licking the "T" suggestively. Is it still a crucifix?
They share the distinction of being crosses, and that aspect makes them comparable.Kafka2 said:But is it a crucifix?
No.
a vacuem cleaner would be a crucifix if i stapled a jesus on tom it. i dont understand why your so unwilling to admit the the swatika has thousands of variations-being as its an acient symbol, and one of those variations is on the Manx Flag. that web link clearly shows and state this fact.Kafka2 said:But is it a crucifix?
No.
Bluemofia said:Didn't Hitler take the Swastika and fliped it and rotated it 45 degrees?
Johann MacLeod said:a vacuem cleaner would be a crucifix if i stapled a jesus on tom it. i dont understand why your so unwilling to admit the the swatika has thousands of variations-being as its an acient symbol, and one of those variations is on the Manx Flag. that web link clearly shows and state this fact.
It was used by early Christians as an alternative cross to avoid persecution, and by later Christians as a decorative emblem.
CruddyLeper said:Earliest recorded = India.
Why did Hitler adopt it? I have no idea.