I did not realise that there was water ice, and possibly even organic compounds on mercury!I saw this video this morning and was not sure if it has been posted in this thread yet.
Mercury transiting the sun. (Takes 5.5 hours viewed from Earth?)
Can't we build a base on Mercury in a polar crater that has frozen water without any sunlight?
Mercury doesn't really have any tilt on an axis.
Draw heat from the scalding hot surface, put up some crazy solar panels, emit extra heat into the crater, etc?
Yes, the same thing is possible on the moon as well.I saw this video this morning and was not sure if it has been posted in this thread yet.
Mercury transiting the sun. (Takes 5.5 hours viewed from Earth?)
Can't we build a base on Mercury in a polar crater that has frozen water without any sunlight?
Mercury doesn't really have any tilt on an axis.
Draw heat from the scalding hot surface, put up some crazy solar panels, emit extra heat into the crater, etc?
https://www.space.com/28356-how-to-live-on-mercury.html
I saw this video this morning and was not sure if it has been posted in this thread yet.
Mercury transiting the sun. (Takes 5.5 hours viewed from Earth?)
Can't we build a base on Mercury in a polar crater that has frozen water without any sunlight?
Mercury doesn't really have any tilt on an axis.
Draw heat from the scalding hot surface, put up some crazy solar panels, emit extra heat into the crater, etc?
https://www.space.com/28356-how-to-live-on-mercury.html
The executive order doesn't really say much other than to implement policies according to a law passed in 2017 which was intended to enable US companies to claim and extract resources in space. There's nothing in it that I saw that was controversial but to your point, Trump has plenty of opportunity to screw things up going forward and I expect he will.
The executive order does push the government to work on agreements with other countries to cement the US position vis a vis allowing commercial resource extraction, which is a good thing. This is the sort of thing we should all agree on before it's needed.
None that the US, Russia or any other space-faring nation have signed on to. It is opposed to the Moon Treaty which has only been signed by 18 non-space countries (and not the US or Russia, et al). The Outer Space Treaty (which the US, Russia and others have signed on to) is silent on private property ownership and extraction of outer space resources. It states no nation can claim parts of outer space but has nothing on commercial activity.
tl;dr - No, this does not violate treaties that the US or other space fairing nations have signed.
The Outer Space Treaty (which the US, Russia and others have signed on to) is silent on private property ownership and extraction of outer space resources. It states no nation can claim parts of outer space but has nothing on commercial activity.
It's not an argument, it's the text of the treaty. And the treaty does allow nations to use outer space but did not define that. The Moon Treaty attempted to curtail commercial activity in space but was roundly rejected by the world.It is an ingenious, but somewhat flawed, argument.
Doubtful. The US is surging forward with its own plans in this area and they are not going to back down if China catches up but would much more likely put forward even more expansive plans.Besides which IMO the USA will change its tune when China surges forward into space.
Has there been naturally occurring antimatter detected?
Most Earth-like planet yet' spotted by Kepler
He announced his retirement from CFCOT quite suddenly, in the 'Comings and Goings' thread early last week.Didn't see Hobbs for a while. Hope he is ok.