While I can agree to that, I will point out that not every state requires Gun safety courses or pay fees. I don't know of any state that doesn't require a test for driving.
I do find it hilarious that he points to a Supreme Court ruling to validate his rights but when asked what he would do if the Supreme Court ruled against said rights, that he'd take up arms to resist it
In Ohio, you must take a Gun Safety course (lecture and range time) and pass it. You must pay several fees and pass at least two criminal background checks.
Code for it's only valid if I agree with it. You're not fooling anyone. The SC is more qualified to rule on the constitutionality of a law then you are.Well because the former is a ruling consistent with the Constitution while the latter is a ruling in contradiction to the Constitution. The Founders were very clear what the people are supposed to do when the government starts deciding the Constitution doesn't matter anymore.
True, farm kids can drive on farmland well before they're of age.
The SC is more qualified to rule on the constitutionality of a law then you are.
If we all operated on your logic "separate but equal" would still be a thing.
If we all operated on your logic "separate but equal" would still be a thing. My point being that the Supreme Court gets it wrong enough that you can't really say they are more qualified to judge Constitutionality than the average citizen. So I compare their rulings to the actual text of the Constitution. If their ruling is consistent with the text, then it's a Constitutional ruling, if not then it's unconstitutional.
No you don't. I live in Ohio and I didn't have to take a course. All I did was walk into the gun shop (West Chester Firearms, a fine establishment), fill out my 4473 and give them my driver's license, and after the 20 minutes it took him to run my background, I walked out of there with my Ruger AR556.
Please point to any post where I have done that. Good luck. I'm sure I'll disagree with a future ruling, but you can bet that when I do, I won't go around screeching about it or threaten to take up arms and kill someone over it. (which you have done)I'll remember this the next time you screech about a Supreme Court ruling you disagree with.
This is such an utterly ridiculous statement it is hard to believe you mean it seriously. Cars are regulated far more heavily than firearms. FIrearms are in fact virtually unregulated in this country.
Oh, the horror. Probably less than 1% of the US.
There are probably more places you can't take a car vs. can't take a gun.
Here in Ohio, you may not carry a Firearm into a police station, jail or prison; a courthouse, government building or Federal building; a place of worship, an airport, a hospital, an institution for the mentally ill; any school - day care, primary, secondary school or college or university, or any building posting a "No Guns" sign (at the discretion of the owner).
No cars either. And if you think you can't carry a gun in Chicago, you're really not informed.