Gori the Grey
The Poster
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2009
- Messages
- 12,593
Yes.
Don't be silly Biden was elected to office before Trump. If you mean elected President, then you have not taken an impartial look at what Trump's administration has done the last four years. As Polonius says in Hamlet, "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't."He's the first mentally handicapped person to be elected into office, which is pretty damn impressive, considering that America just recently elected the first black president. I was hoping we could get this going and elect a woman next, but it looks like we're going to be running into a combo breaker in the fall
Trump has proven very good at foreign policy.What’s he actually nominated for? Is there anything specific being touted?
Don't be silly Biden was elected to office before Trump. If you mean elected President, then you have not taken an impartial look at what Trump's administration has done the last four years.
Trump has proven very good at foreign policy.
Focusing on Iran as the principal instigator of unrest in the region has born fruit. Treating Israel as part of the solution rather than part of the problem has born fruit. On a global scale, similar things apply to China.
J
Either that or "for, to define true madness, /What is 't but to be nothing else but mad?"As Polonius says in Hamlet, "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't."
Don't be silly Biden was elected to office before Trump. If you mean elected President, then you have not taken an impartial look at what Trump's administration has done the last four years. As Polonius says in Hamlet, "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't."
Trump has proven very good at foreign policy.
That's a pretty antisemitic statement.So? No? Trump has only been good on foreign policy in the eyes of racist and xenophobic dogs. Israel is a source of the problem. Acting like an apartheid state will mean no matter who they make peace with (this whole thing was just confirming a status who arrangement anyways l), Israel is a problem.
It means that the nomination for the Peace Prize is well deserved.If by "very good" you mean the exact opposite of what those words mean, then I'll agree with you!
It means that the nomination for the Peace Prize is well deserved.
You are half right. Obama winning was a joke.Obama winning the prize was a joke, and this is 20x more laughable. I do think your standards for this prize are way too low.
what makes you think roosevelt and winston didn't deserve it (latter's ploy didn't work out in the end, but it was still a good shot)Any American president winning this prize is a joke, past or present. But Trump? You might as well give an oscar to a 12 year old youtuber
Trump has proven very good at foreign policy.
Focusing on Iran as the principal instigator of unrest in the region has born fruit. Treating Israel as part of the solution rather than part of the problem has born fruit. On a global scale, similar things apply to China.
J
J, as an intelligent human being you do have to admit that Trumps literal murder of Qasem Soleimani was a completely horrible foreign policy move (Soleimani, btw, who was literally the US' biggest ally in the fight against ISIS and is a genuine national hero).
It It strengthened anti-America sentiments in the entire Shia muslim world. It strengthened anti-American factions and extremist factions inside of Iran. It broke off a relationship that was starting to heal. It fueled a national conspiracy, which exists in Iran ever since the British-American Coup almost 100 years ago. It also fueled tensions between Iran and Israel, and lastly between Iran and its neighbors. It also made the USA in general seem entirely erratic. It achieved absolutely nothing, strategically.
This is just one example of a generally horrible foreign policy that alienates most of the world, but especially those that America has wronged before.
That's a pretty antisemitic statement.
Where does apartheid come into it? Israel is not ruled by a minority.
It means that the nomination for the Peace Prize is well deserved.
J
J, as an intelligent human being you do have to admit that Trumps literal murder of Qasem Soleimani was a completely horrible foreign policy move (Soleimani, btw, who was literally the US' biggest ally in the fight against ISIS and is a genuine national hero).
It It strengthened anti-America sentiments in the entire Shia muslim world. It strengthened anti-American factions and extremist factions inside of Iran. It broke off a relationship that was starting to heal. It fueled a national conspiracy, which exists in Iran ever since the British-American Coup almost 100 years ago. It also fueled tensions between Iran and Israel, and lastly between Iran and its neighbors. It also made the USA in general seem entirely erratic. It achieved absolutely nothing, strategically.
what makes you think roosevelt and winston didn't deserve it (latter's ploy didn't work out in the end, but it was still a good shot)