Not being snide.You could have done this post without the snide attitude.
Just legal disclaimers.
I've heard that argument before and i find it very odd.and there are a lot of people who see nothing wrong parroting the line of "but we already have a woman on the money - the Queen's a woman!".
Like, obviously i don't exactly like monarchy on account of, well, national history, but...
...if anything the office the monarchy should matter and the gender of the monarch should be immaterial.
So it doesn't really count.
I'm sure you can put together what i mean.
Well, i'd agree with that, among other things for the sake of the chance to replace the Queen on currency with an actual Canadian woman with actual pertaining accomplishments.Note that these tend to be the same people who whine and rant about the monarchy and how much better off we'd be if we booted them out of our constitution after the Queen dies.
Sounds like a good plan to me.