The real reasons she was impeached were the monumental, unprecedented economic collapse that her idiocy caused, plus the multi billion ransacking of the country carried out by her party. This resulted in a president that had almost no suport in Congress, and was the most unpopular in history among the people. In short, there was not way she could rule. So we found a reason to impeach her - a valid and legal reason, BTW, which was thoroughly proved. It's just that a competent and popular president would not be impeached for that alone - but she was neither.You impeached Rousseff because of what? Where exactly in the constitution does it say that a president cam be impeached because it caused an economic crisis?
The truth is that an economic crisis is not an impeachable offense (but it does offer a political opportunity for doing it anyway). No was Rousseff corrupt, no one ever managed to charge her of anything. Unlike the vast majority of those who cast votes to impeach her, who most certainly are corrupt, many in trial and others already condemned. It was a coup, plain and simple. The actual excuse used to impeach her was illegitimate, a false charge.
As for her not being corrupt... She was in the board of directors of Petrobras AND was the Minister of Energy during the height of the ransacking... She personally named most of the directors that did the stealing. If Brazil was the US, she'd be in prison for a loooong time.