Video: New York needs Polygamy!

What a blind and ignorant nut.

People like this guy need to get over themselves and realize that the west simply do not share their oppressive, ancient and backwards customs.
 
A 1/3 of NYC is gay. Who knew? ;)
 
But what happens to the men who cant find a wife? Do they have to become 'public property' too. Many are going to starve lol.
 
Did you notice that he assumes there are no female homosexuals?

He thinks all '25 million' gays are men.

:lol:
 
memri again?I remember this site came up in a recent thread - not in a good light. I'm trying to find that thread... Where's Perf when you need him?
 
This is so wierd and twisted :dubious:.
 
his logic is right and the factual figures speak for themselves. The problem is simple the western world does not accept polygamy, that's the reason why many people don't agree with him even thought he is 100% right.
 
His logics are correct, but not right. Indeed he does not take into account the possibility that females are gay, nor the possibility of divorce and remarrying.
 
Or that some people simply don't get married anymore, they either take the common law route, or stay single
 
Common law is only practiced in the United Kingdom and some common wealth nations.
 
willemvanoranje said:
His logics are correct, but not right. Indeed he does not take into account the possibility that females are gay, nor the possibility of divorce and remarrying.

Exactly, he forgot women are gay. Hehe.

The guys on that video were really eating it up though, weren't they? They liked what they were hearing... big city women all looking for a mate, needing rescue!
 
Bugfatty300 said:
What a blind and ignorant nut.

People like this guy need to get over themselves and realize that the west simply do not share their oppressive, ancient and backwards customs.
I haven't watched the video yet, so if he's pushing from a religious point of view then I don't defend that[*]. But note that the concept of multiple marriage doesn't equal "oppressive, ancient and backwards" - especially considering that the tradition has long been exclusive marriages, I would argue the opposite.

Multiple marriage - or more generally multiple relationships (polyamory) does solve the problem of "well I like you, but I've already got a boyfriend", and in places where one gender outnumbers the other, it's never nice to see several boys after one girl (or vice versa), and all the relationship-stealing, unfaithfulness and backstabbing that goes with that.

But ultimately I don't think you can posit it as a solution, people should be free to do what they prefer. Well, except that in our oppressive, ancient and backwards society, multiple marriages are illegal, so we aren't free to choose here.

([*] Though I still don't get it why religion is viewed as bad when it comes to multiple marriages, but the complete opposite is true when it comes to monogamy - i.e., so many people think it's intrinsically a religious thing and that that's good...; imo, religious marriage is ancient and backwards full stop.)
 
Katheryn said:
"if a woman doesn't find a man, the only other option for her is to become public property, and I can only use this word... because I am a man of God."

This guys really sums up the reason why the West should pummel these primitive assassins.

.
 
mdwh said:
I haven't watched the video yet, so if he's pushing from a religious point of view then I don't defend that[*]. But note that the concept of multiple marriage doesn't equal "oppressive, ancient and backwards" - especially considering that the tradition has long been exclusive marriages, I would argue the opposite.

Multiple marriage - or more generally multiple relationships (polyamory) does solve the problem of "well I like you, but I've already got a boyfriend", and in places where one gender outnumbers the other, it's never nice to see several boys after one girl (or vice versa), and all the relationship-stealing, unfaithfulness and backstabbing that goes with that.

But ultimately I don't think you can posit it as a solution, people should be free to do what they prefer. Well, except that in our oppressive, ancient and backwards society, multiple marriages are illegal, so we aren't free to choose here.

([*] Though I still don't get it why religion is viewed as bad when it comes to multiple marriages, but the complete opposite is true when it comes to monogamy - i.e., so many people think it's intrinsically a religious thing and that that's good...; imo, religious marriage is ancient and backwards full stop.)


Well, unfortunately for women, it doesn't go both ways. Only men are allowed multiple sex partners in these polygamous societies. :crazyeye:
 
Katheryn said:
Well, unfortunately for women, it doesn't go both ways. Only men are allowed multiple sex partners in these polygamous societies. :crazyeye:

Swingers say different.
 
Back
Top Bottom