That's dreadfully contradictory, though.
Unless his ultimate point is that's he's talking rubbish the whole time?
Why should I listen to his words of wisdom if his words of wisdom are that words of wisdom aren't wise?
his point is that philosophers/thinkers should not veer to an extreme of imparticular abstraction. on the level of universals, any ad-hoc justification can be formulated and any statement thus made can be effortlessly presented its antithesis. and not even syntheses are exempt from blame.
I think his views are spot on and it's something I've personally come to the conclusion of many times prior in life.
here's an example of it from the Finance world, both statements of generalized "wisdom" endorsed by the same guy:
What not to do, right? Buy high and sell low? seems elementary?
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/1...campaign=Feed:+TheBigPicture+(The+Big+Picture)
But nooooooo, market highs are a sign of more bullish times:
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-03-05/no-market-highs-are-not-a-bad-sign
To me what he is saying is that you arent the possesor of wisdom if you view and understand at any given moment any particular reality from one angle only. You may be aware of portion of reality and its half-truth but if you cant see it in proper context and be able to change your vision together with the dynamics which are string to it your "wisdom" is lame.his point is that philosophers/thinkers should not veer to an extreme of imparticular abstraction. on the level of universals, any ad-hoc justification can be formulated and any statement thus made can be effortlessly presented its antithesis. and not even syntheses are exempt from blame.
I think his views are spot on and it's something I've personally come to the conclusion of many times prior in life.
^The reason i viewed that person in the video as quite abhorrent ( :/ ) was that he seems to come across as someone that tries to cancel the knowledge others may present, while himself does not present anything interesting anyway. He is no Socrates either, cause if Socrates moved his arms like that, and used phrases like "Kierkegaard is the anti-wisdom philosopher 'par excellence' (sic, dreadful phrase...) then he would have lived as a circus act, and not put on trial and eventually drinking some conium to leave for good the 'prisoners in the cave'
^Cool, but i still prefer the machine of the old Commissioner in the Penal ColonySpoiler :