Hggnnnn Bitcoins are up 50% in the last 2 days to over $140.
What in blazes is going on?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-03/bitcoins-go-parabolic
Currency values shouldn't move that fast.
Hyperinflation!
Hggnnnn Bitcoins are up 50% in the last 2 days to over $140.
What in blazes is going on?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-03/bitcoins-go-parabolic
Currency values shouldn't move that fast.
Hggnnnn Bitcoins are up 50% in the last 2 days to over $140.
What in blazes is going on?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-03/bitcoins-go-parabolic
Currency values shouldn't move that fast.

Hyperinflation!
You realize hyperinflation would have the currency moving in the other direction?
The price of the virtual currency bitcoin, already volatile in recent weeks, went through wild swings in overnight trading Tuesday and Wednesday.
According to prices quoted on Mt.Gox, the main trading exchange for bitcoins, the value of one bitcoin ricocheted from $106 to as high as $147, then back down to $125, then to $141. They were trading around $139 per bitcoin in afternoon trading Wednesday.
Two weeks ago, a bitcoin was worth only $47. When Mt.Gox started tracking prices in mid-2010 the price stood at only 5 cents per bitcoin.
Investors have been pouring into bitcoins and gold in recent weeks, as authorities in Cyprus imposed a tax on top bank depositors and placed limits on bank withdrawals in order to pay for a European bailout of the banking system there.
Hggnnnn Bitcoins are up 50% in the last 2 days to over $140.
What in blazes is going on?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-03/bitcoins-go-parabolic
Currency values shouldn't move that fast.

You realize hyperinflation would have the currency moving in the other direction?
If it can whipsaw up 50% in can certainly whipsaw down 50%.
edit: Also, ignore Zelig. He thinks he knows everything but he don't.
Zelig said:Right, so it all averages out.
How's that, then?
Right, so it all averages out.
No it is transfering money from active traders to the inactive.



No it is transfering money from active traders to the inactive.
So generally from the poorer to the rich.
Because they're roughly equally volatile up and down?
Yeah, it really helped crystalise the dichotomy between a currency and a commodity for me. It seems to work as a currency, or as a commodity, but not as both at the same time. Basically like an artificial version of gold.That's a really well-written and balanced article. Thanks for sharing.