What are your thoughts on BitCoin?

You realize hyperinflation would have the currency moving in the other direction?

If it can whipsaw up 50% in can certainly whipsaw down 50%. And when that happens merchants are gonna be pissed royally and the currency might die if they decide it isn't worth the hassle.



http://money.cnn.com/2013/04/03/investing/bitcoin-price/index.html

The price of the virtual currency bitcoin, already volatile in recent weeks, went through wild swings in overnight trading Tuesday and Wednesday.

According to prices quoted on Mt.Gox, the main trading exchange for bitcoins, the value of one bitcoin ricocheted from $106 to as high as $147, then back down to $125, then to $141. They were trading around $139 per bitcoin in afternoon trading Wednesday.


Two weeks ago, a bitcoin was worth only $47. When Mt.Gox started tracking prices in mid-2010 the price stood at only 5 cents per bitcoin.

Investors have been pouring into bitcoins and gold in recent weeks, as authorities in Cyprus imposed a tax on top bank depositors and placed limits on bank withdrawals in order to pay for a European bailout of the banking system there.
 
Hggnnnn Bitcoins are up 50% in the last 2 days to over $140.

What in blazes is going on?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-03/bitcoins-go-parabolic



Currency values shouldn't move that fast.

This reminds of the early days of BitCoin. It's hard to tell what's going to happen but the trend thus far has been that whenever it gets this high, somebody sells a huge volume and smashes the market. :dunno:

Considering that there are some people out there sitting on upwards of thousands of BitCoins, I'd say this is getting more and more likely.

edit: Also, ignore Zelig. He thinks he knows everything but he don't.
 
If it can whipsaw up 50% in can certainly whipsaw down 50%.

Right, so it all averages out.

edit: Also, ignore Zelig. He thinks he knows everything but he don't.

I certainly don't think I know everything - in fact, I remain willfully ignorant on many topics because I have limited time.
 
Right, so it all averages out.

No it is transfering money from active traders to the inactive.
So generally from the poorer to the rich.

As Crezth pointed out there are people sitting on thousands of bitcoins that they purchased when they were less than $50. Now they are selling them off at high points in the market.

I am thinking of planting some tulips in my garden this autumn to sell next year.
 
Oh no i got that the wrong way round:blush::blush::blush:

No it is transfering money from active traders to the inactive.
So generally from the poorer to the rich.

No it is transfering money from inactive traders to the active.
So generally from the poorer to the rich
 
That's a really well-written and balanced article. Thanks for sharing.
 
Because they're roughly equally volatile up and down?

So what? "It all averages out" reduces the rather erm complicated question of financial everything to a matter of total value over time, which one doesn't need a math degree to see is somewhat misleading.
 
That's a really well-written and balanced article. Thanks for sharing.
Yeah, it really helped crystalise the dichotomy between a currency and a commodity for me. It seems to work as a currency, or as a commodity, but not as both at the same time. Basically like an artificial version of gold.
 
Right. I never really thought about it in these terms but it's a good way to point out why BitCoin can never possibly fulfill all the expectations it was saddled with.
 
I really do not understand the technology behind this, but it seems to me that if this was successful we would be asking for a catastrophe. Lets say that BitCoin took off, and a significant part of global trade was done with it. Then quantum computers take off and allows them to be cracked. Is global financial collapse a realistic consequence?
 
Back
Top Bottom