Kozmos
Jew Detective
Tether is almost certainly going down. They are basically printing USD which won't be allowed to stand.
This is only true when there is a trackable, underlying value. At all points in time, you need to be able to identify the customer to whom you're going to sell your asset. During the housing bubble, a homeowner who wanted to live in that house provided the floor for the underlying value. During the Tulip bubble, people who like flowers for their own sake or the floor. For any specific company, the future dividend stream provides the underlying value.
It could very easily be the, in retrospect, ideal time to rebuy bitcoin. But the rule of thumb expressed in your post is not true, for the reasons stated above.
I fell like you're not addressing the substance of his post. For example, you say things like "as long as there are enough people willing to pull out", whereas El Mac's point is that this is better stated as "as long as there are no customers for the product".I mean, to be completely honest with you, this crash could very well be the end of crypto alltogether. Any crash can. As long as there are enough people willing to pull out, as long as there is panic and as long as the exclusively negative coverage in the news won't go away (it won't) then I don't really see crypto recovering.
We are back to early december stats, maybe worse than early december depending on what you are looking at.
So are you lads selling up now? Waiting for it to go up again before buying? I know you said you were moving to other cryptocurrencies but it looks like they're all going down in tandem? https://coincodex.com/ <-- 1m change is basically all negative.
Another thing I found interesting, there are 634 different cryptocurrencies with over $1m market cap. Unbelievable.
The only way to be safe is to convert to FIAT.
fiat (as in unbacked by anything real)
Is the power of governments to set tax liabilities not real?
But they're also only backed by the trustworthiness of the backing government, which can change based on human whims.
I picked up some more lite, it's the one I'm most heavily invested in.I think I can make money during this time though. There's really 2 events this week that could swing price. The one for sure is Litepay, which could be gamechanging whenever it launches as it could change the BTC/LTC ratio for good(already changed 20% this weekend because of upcoming release), and we know it will hit this week. The one other is tether, if it explodes, it will bring everything down with it. So I need to figure out which day this week LTCPAY plans on coming out.
You could take a punt on miners currently exploring in Australia, Canada or Brazil. I don't know about the geology of where phosphorus reserves are found but if I had to guess it would be one of those places.It's both real and not real. There is no doubt that fiat currencies have real value encoded in their ability to discharge debt and tax obligations. But they're also only backed by the trustworthiness of the backing government, which can change based on human whims. The majority of fiat currencies have their values maintained at the whim of the issuing authority. If you trust that they will maintain their 2% inflation target, that's one thing. But they also needn't.
I was dealing with this just the other day, since I was trying to figure out how to profit from future phosphorous demand. The owner of the phosphorous won't sell ownership over their portion (which is fair), but I also cannot invest merely by buying the owner's currency, since I have no idea if that government will dilute its own currency in order to soften it.
It requires an extra step in determining the value of the currency, not only do you look at the underlying assets owned by the issuer, but also how much you trust the issuer to maintain a limit on how much they print.
So - whence the word 'only' here? Governments are almost by definition some of the most trustworthy entities in human history. There is a reason that all modern economies use "state money". Ideally, "the trustworthiness of the backing government" is simply the trustworthiness of the people themselves, represented through their government. This 'public trust,' built up over many generations, is surely a thing that embodies real value no less than the ability of the government to compel the discharge of debts and the payment of taxes.
Absolutely, there's a fine line between supporting my ability to turn my capital into speculative capital for production of an essential service and the result we have now, where wealth rushes upwards faster than it trickles downward.I also think it's interesting because you've unwittingly slipped up and fingered the major problem with how the advanced world runs its economies. Economic policy already reflects too much concern for the needs of people who are, like you are in your story, trying to figure out how to profit from owning stuff.