What Book Are You Reading? Volume 9

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Clash of Civilizations by Samuel P. Huntington.
So far pretty interesting and far less stupid than I expected.
 
But still stupid.

I have the feeling that the harshest critics and the most ardent supporters of Huntington's thesis either didn't read it or didn't get it, but I've just finished page 150 of about 500.
Did you read it ?
 
Finishing up Nabokov's The Real Life of Sebastian Knight. Thinking about picking up some Jew lit after this.
 
1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus, Charles C. Mann - Brilliant. Covered an interesting and somewhat contentious subject matter with erudition, a lively discourse and with, what I felt, was a fair attempt to present both sides of the story. It consequently managed to hold my attention to the end. Could be said to be a macro-history that refutes the arguments of other macro-histories, special kudos to the rather deft treatment of the Maya (re: Diamond). Highly recommended and frankly enthralling. Cheers to NK for recommending it to me some time ago. I've managed to muster some interest in the Americas, sorta.

The Memory Room, Christopher Koch - Acceptable. Pretty standard Koch, it seems that if you've read one you've read them all. It read like The Year of Living Dangerously only less interesting with cookie cutter characters culled from the same cloth. It also lacked the historical clarity of his earlier works and felt like a faded newsreel dug up in the Australian archives complete with the moldering corpse of the clerk who got killed in a rather unfortunate doco-slide. (That place isn't conducive to human life). Not his best, possibly his worst, but still readable.

In Cold Blood, Truman Capote - Chilling but good. I didn't like the stylization, I guess, the reporter cum writer side showed through but I guess that's to be expected considering the format. Enjoyed.

Southeast Asia: An Introductory History, Milton Osbourne - The best short history of Southeast Asia. Granted, in the early period it would be more appropriate to call it not a short history but a guide to the mechanics underpinning the regions history. It nicely shows the reader the limitations of their implicit assumptions with regards to the necessity of force in the maintenance of a state, the notion of a state as an entity and the agency of locals. In short: most of what Westerners sub-consciously bring to the table when discussing the history of the region is flat-out wrong. If you want to learn how to go about understanding Southeast Asia history, then you should read this. If you want a straight history which will have almost no lasting value, I can recommend those. If you want a good general history which also takes the time to explain the inner mechanics of the region to aid in further readings, this is the book. It also has a very useful bibliography and notes. Highly recommended.

A History of Southeast Asia, ed. Peter Church - This happens to be the other history I mentioned in the previous paragraph. Solid, but only really useful in the narrowest sense.

Life & Times of Micheal K, J. M. Coetzee - Interesting. I didn't think I'd like Coetzee, I was wrong. The writing is sparse, the story is relatively simple, but the imagery and the clarity with which the Mssr. K's story is related is breathtaking. Highly recommended, although I understand that Coetzee can be a love or hate affair, with very little in the middle.

Disgrace, J. M. Coetzee - Similar to the Life & Times of Michael K. Highly recommended, with the same caveat.

Light in August, Faulkner - I like McCarthy. I don't think I need to say much more.

Percy Jackson and the Lightning Thief, Rick Riordan - I don't know how I read stuff like this as a kid...
 
Impressive.

I have the feeling that the harshest critics and the most ardent supporters of Huntington's thesis either didn't read it or didn't get it, but I've just finished page 150 of about 500.
Did you read it ?

That's what I was wondering.

Some books I've read not recently:

C.H. Beck, Die Karthager. Quite insightful survey of the history and research of this Phoenician colony.

Roland Oliver, The African Experience. Short survey of the history of Africa by an eminent specialist.

Jack Weatherford, Native Roots. How the Indians Enriched America. Short survey of the influence of the Native americans on the USA, linguistically and sociologically.

Alan Gurney, Compass. A Story of Exploration and Innovation. History of the compass; 't was a gift, otherwise I wouldn't have read it. Still interesting to read.
 
dang, all these informative books people are reading - and all I'm reading is Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince...

:lol:
 
I have the feeling that the harshest critics and the most ardent supporters of Huntington's thesis either didn't read it or didn't get it, but I've just finished page 150 of about 500.
Did you read it ?

I had that feeling too.

His book is stupid anyway.
 
The Story of Civilization: The Life of Greece, W. Durant - The second of the series, admittedly dated even to my limited eyes, but still good value considering what I paid for it. I also really enjoy the writers style, it makes for some lively writing, although I find it can begin to break down in the longer sections. Recommended if you want to get a handle on history in general -- that while dated -- is still informative and valuable, in that it provides a comprehensive historical framework from which to expand your knoweldge base.

The Name of the Rose, Umberto Eco - Eh? I'm not sure if I like Eco, or if I don't. I think this book bears some substantial thinking on my part. If you live Medieval murder mystery with a penchant for the historically accurate this is your book. Extra points for the time spent explaining the nature(s), energy(ies) and so forth of Christ.

A History of the Byzantine State and Society, Warren Treadgold - Brilliant. If you want a book that looks at the whole of Byzantine History, this is for you. I've managed to thoroughly enjoy all 900 pages of text which is well written managing, as it does, to avoid repetition which I find is common in large histories. Why did Constans go into Italy without first securing the border against raids and retaking Greece?

JEELEN said:
Impressive.

Not really, one week at home and three weeks on holiday.

Besarionis said:
His book is stupid anyway.

Marco-historic explanations invariably are unless you couch them in so many caveats that you might as well not be reading it. If you don't couch them in caveats you end up with Diamond... :(
 
Marco-historic explanations invariably are unless you couch them in so many caveats that you might as well not be reading it. If you don't couch them in caveats you end up with Diamond... :(

Yep, more or less had that one figured out after a couple days in a Polisci class. :lol:
 
A History of the Byzantine State and Society, Warren Treadgold - Brilliant. If you want a book that looks at the whole of Byzantine History, this is for you. I've managed to thoroughly enjoy all 900 pages of text which is well written managing, as it does, to avoid repetition which I find is common in large histories. Why did Constans go into Italy without first securing the border against raids and retaking Greece?
Another convert! :goodjob:

As for Konstas, I think it's because he really thought the situation was That Bad outside the area of his effective control. Thrace could keep, because Constantinople had its walls. Greece, he figured, was a lost cause. Italy had the Pope, was close to the useful parts of North Africa, was semi-rich, and needed to be reorganized anyway. Better to keep what he already had than to lose it all on a gamble to grab something else. Ioustinianos II apparently didn't learn the same lesson.
 
Dachs said:
Another convert!

Anymore recommendations? :goodjob:

Dachs said:
Ioustinianos II apparently didn't learn the same lesson.

There's some amusing about the propensity of people who share that name to overreach themselves... :mischief:
 
As part of a drive to reduce my backlog of unread purchased books, i started reading:

The Merchant of Prato: Francesco Di Marco Datini by Iris Origo
 
Anymore recommendations? :goodjob:

Seconded!!! With Dachs voracious appetite for history, he has probably sorted out the wheat from the chaff by now. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom