So, what are we to make of this? Is this ambiguity a new one, or simply one that has been brought into sharper relief with the decline of the Empire? Is "Britishness" on the way out, or can a greater clarity be achieved? What is the relationship between Britishness and ethnic or racial identity? I don't pretend to know the answers to these questions; what does CFC think?
Well, nationalism is more easily defined by contrasting 'us' to 'them', than by trying to define a 'we', isn't it?
In today's Europe there is very little to contrast a Scot from an Englishman, a German from a Frenchman, a Norwegian from a Swede, or a Scot from a German. As such, it's a general trend that nationalism is on the way out among Europeans. I believe the mass immigration of the last half century, both within Europe and from outside Europe, isn't helping to preserve nationalism much either - except when certain discomforts with life ends up in the safety valves of the UKIP, PVV, Golden Dawn and others.
The point I think is that Britishness might well have become redundant. It used to be a common super-nationality for the people of the British Isles, all the time they could contrast themselves to the monarchy or Republic of France, the papal Spain or the feuding German principalities. Now it is simply an unnecessary extra layer between, say, a Scottish identity (for whatever that's still worth!) and a European identity.
I know from my own point of view, if Norway was still in a union with Sweden, I wouldn't vote to divest Norway from them. Unless western Norway could also leave the eastern parts: Whether the North Sea oil profits go to Oslo or Stockholm makes little difference for me.
However, I hold my Norwegianess to the same importance as Frenchness or Germaness. If the Swedish-Norwegian Union joined the EU, I would have no reason to have an extra layer between my own identity and that of my European identity. Then I would probably vote for independence (the oil profits would just end up in Brussels instead of Stockholm or somesuch...).
...
Thinking some more about it, even without the EU, there would be little reason for me to have any intermediate identities between my Norwegian and my European identity... Or why would I need a Norwegian identity at all!?
In fact, I believe that the only thing that can currently keep an identity for a smaller set than the European identity is language! Because I speak Norwegian, I believe I have something in common with other Norwegians.
I suppose that if (as?) Scottish becomes more important in Scotland, there will be less support for any remaining Britishness.
Did any of that make sense in the end?
Yet, obviously with the Scottish independence movement on the verge of being rejected in September it appears there is something binding the countries together.
It's just inertia: Everything is pretty okay now, so why do something as radical as splitting from the UK? Most people will just leave things as they are, because there simply isn't any reason to change it much.