Narz
keeping it real
Just a thought experiment. In a world without constraint where the well being of all beings could be effortlessly attained without struggle and competition what would existence be like? Could such a world even be possible?
Genesis 3:5 said:For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
Existence would be like a Star Trek holodeck where the food and all other necessities are real rather than phototonic, and nothing ever malfunctions or does something unexpected.Just a thought experiment. In a world without constraint where the well being of all beings could be effortlessly attained without struggle and competition what would existence be like? Could such a world even be possible?
Don't people of the same faith still have different ideas of what the ideal afterlife would be?You can train a human to accept all sorts of things it's not hard wired to do.
I think this universe would be what the Christians like to call "Heaven".
Does training involve constraints?You can train a human to accept all sorts of things it's not hard wired to do.
I think this universe would be what the Christians like to call "Heaven".
It makes me think about the words constraint and conflict. Are you using them synonymously?I do not see how you could have 2 individuals in the same universe and they both have no constraints. Being alone in a universe sounds more like hell than heaven to me.
I do not think so. For a stupid example, if you and I could make all stars whatever colour we wanted, and I liked them red and you liked them blue we could not both have what we want.It makes me think about the words constraint and conflict. Are you using them synonymously?
is that not a conflict?I do not think so. For a stupid example, if you and I could make all stars whatever colour we wanted, and I liked them red and you liked them blue we could not both have what we want.
I guess so. Then what I am saying is that conflict is a limit on constraint. To have no conflict you cannot have multiple unconstrained entities in the same universe, therefore everyone having no constraint means everyone is in their own universe.is that not a conflict?
So, are we assuming that a "human" without constraints would require an entire universe? Is there any other "life form" that we can imagine sharing a universe without constraints?I guess so. Then what I am saying is that conflict is a limit on constraint. To have no conflict you cannot have multiple unconstrained entities in the same universe, therefore everyone having no constraint means everyone is in their own universe.