Blasphemous
Graulich
What's moralistic about assuming that "progress" implies the kind of change that a one-party system cannot provide? Seems logical to me, not moral.
Bearing my earlier example of a dictator who raises the average life expectancy of a nation in mind, how is this not progress? Making a blanket statement that a one-party state cannot ever have progress, is a moral decision.Blasphemous said:What's moralistic about assuming that "progress" implies the kind of change that a one-party system cannot provide? Seems logical to me, not moral.
I am not taking issue with those who think a multi-party democracy is superior; I am taking issue with those who designed the test. The person/people who created the test has/have an obligation to ensure that the questions are not skewed in favor of a given political ideology. Such a question would have thrown up red flags if this test was intended to be an impartial "political compass".Blasphemous said:Actually I think I'll digress at this point... The idea of the quiz would appear to be that you answer however you feel is right... It's all about how you feel, no matter if these feelings are logical or moral or not, if they have a logical or moral basis or not, or if they can be rationalized or moralized or not.
Do the symbols represent anything, or are they just random?Cuivienen said:One labeled Political Compass graph coming right up! Interesting to note is that, on the political compass, SonicX and Fetus4188 are exactly the same.
Gr3yL3gion said:Wow, I'm at the least populated region in the political compass.
@Cuivienen. Thanks
Still a Fascist from my point of view.ThERat said:seems that being an convinced freethinker makes me quite a libertarian![]()
Aphex_Twin said:Who has the data packed up together?