Which Book Are You Reading Now? Volume XII

Status
Not open for further replies.
Review from the Washington Post:

By Nicola JoyceAugust 8, 2014
As I look up from the pages of this book, there’s nothing between me and the horizon but water. The only sounds are the hypnotic hiss of stones as they are dragged back by waves and the occasional call of a gull. Fresh air gusts over the water’s surface, picking up notes of saltwater and seaweed. My mind is perfectly at peace. And it’s no surprise that I’ve headed to the beach to read “Blue Mind.” The author, Wallace J. Nichols, would tell me that I sought out the nearest body of water because I instinctively knew it would settle my mind, sharpen my senses and put me in a more productive state. But what I didn’t know — until I read the book — was why this happens.

“Blue Mind” is a fascinating study of the emotional, behavioral, psychological and physical connections that keep humans so enchanted with water. Nichols examines seas and oceans, lakes and rivers, even swimming pools and the contents of our bathtubs in a study that is both highly readable and rooted in real research. He is a marine biologist whose passion for our planet’s water goes far beyond the classroom. He urges us to get closer to water, not only for our own sake but for the environment and a healthier future for us all. The blue mind of the book’s title refers to the neurological, psychological and emotional changes our brains experience when we are close to water. Nichols draws on science and art, hard data and anecdote, and plenty of experience, to explain our blue mind in detail. Not just what it is, but how we can enter into this state and — perhaps most important — why we should do so.

The benefits of nurturing our blue mind go beyond just feeling good. Our blue mind is up against two other common states, as Nichols explains: red mind (stressed, anxious, overactive yet underproductive) and gray mind (numb, lethargic, demotivated and unsatisfied). Red and gray mind states are products of our modern lifestyles, habits and choices. Blue mind is a natural state that we all instinctively know but that many of us have forgotten.

Nichols calls on neuroscience to explain the cognitive processes our minds go through in response to water, combining scientific language and examples with personal anecdotes and stories borrowed from authors, artists and athletes. There are plenty of wow moments and passages that will leave you nodding your head in understanding. It’s incredible to think that we can alter our brain’s positive neural pathways by increasing our exposure to happy experiences in, near or on water, but apparently it’s true. While the mind runs the show, the body isn’t left out of the discussion. Most of us could close our eyes right now and recall the sights and associated sounds of our favorite shoreline.

Nichols explores the sensory appeal of water, showing us how the sight, sound, feel, and even smell and taste of water affect us on an incredibly deep and raw level. As a former swimmer, I enjoyed the stories of swimmers, surfers, divers, anglers, paddlers and boatfolk, and those who work on the water. Nichols peppers the neuroscience with fresh angles and stories. Did you know that actor Michael J. Fox made the career-changing decision to leave the hit show “Spin City” (and go on to launch the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research) after a surprise swim with a sea turtle? The book is beautifully supported throughout with quotations from novels and poetry, essays and famous speeches, all of which drive home the close bond we have always had with water. It’s a relationship as ancient as philosophy, art, sport and culture. “Thousands have lived without love,” W.H. Auden wrote, “not one without water.”

Ultimately, Nichols suggests that being close to water can make us not only happier, calmer and more emotionally healthy, but also more successful in life, relationships and even business. By tapping into an evolutionary urge that lies dormant in us all, we can access a powerful mental capacity for greatness. It’s something we all have the ability to do. This book shows us how to recognize it, stop ignoring it and tune in to it.

If you grew up near water, if you eagerly look forward to vacations at the shore, if you swim, surf, sail, dive or snorkel, get a copy of this book. You’ll read it once and then come back to it time and again as you begin to realize how your love for water has always shaped your decisions, feelings, behavior, choices and lifestyle. As for me? I moved back to the coast two years ago when the landlocked life I knew suddenly fell apart and I found myself floating, anchorless and unmoored. The seaside of my childhood called me back, and I followed, not knowing why the decision felt so good. Now I know: I was honoring my blue mind. It all makes perfect sense.
 
Decades ago, I read a piece opining humans evolved in the shallows of the sea. This gave us protections from big cats.

This explains why vaginas in humans migrated forward, to shelter from sand. Permanent breasts and long hair on human females gave infants something to hold on to while bobbing in the waves.
 
Decades ago, I read a piece opining humans evolved in the shallows of the sea. This gave us protections from big cats.
You're talking about the [Semi-]Aquatic Ape Hypothesis.

A journalist called Elaine Morgan wrote at least 3 books on the subject, about 30 years ago (The Aquatic Ape, and The Scars of Evolution are the 2 titles I remember for sure, and I think the third was called The Descent of Woman).

Personally I think it looks like a great idea, and more compelling than the Savannah Ape Hypothesis, but AFAIK most (male?) professional anthropologists (still?) prefer the latter.
 
You're talking about the [Semi-]Aquatic Ape Hypothesis.

A journalist called Elaine Morgan wrote at least 3 books on the subject, about 30 years ago (The Aquatic Ape, and The Scars of Evolution are the 2 titles I remember for sure, and I think the third was called The Descent of Woman).

Personally I think it looks like a great idea, and more compelling than the Savannah Ape Hypothesis, but AFAIK most (male?) professional anthropologists (still?) prefer the latter.

Meh. There's no real need to posit an aquatic lifestyle to undermine the "noble hunter" image she was trying to dispel. We already know that most of the "facts" misogynists project into the past to explain how humans "naturally" are, are wrong.

Review from the Washington Post:

Well, I guess I lucked out being a swimmer then.
 
X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy for the Chemical and Materials Sciences by John Evans discusses the use of X-rays to study sample composition and structure. It explains the mechanism and then discusses equipment, methodology, analysis, and finishes with case studies from the field mentioned in the title.
 
I am rather annoyed by (re) reading Kafka's letters to Milena. There is something not nice at all about a wife cheating with Kafka.
It would have been far more straightforward if it was De Maupassant. Now it is rather freakish.
 
Time and Being, by Martin Boringer.

Only read the first ten pages by now. At least it is on a subject i care about, but already i am disliking the use of "dasein". Also i am not fond of the style of argument that much, and i was surprised there is so little of Plato (and not even of the dialogues one would expect) in the intro. But we shall see. :)
 
51amCG5ezcL._SX326_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
61wcWV4qBpL._SX316_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg


Still chipping away that doorstop history of Judaism, too. It's a bit too big to take about with me, so can't read it at work, etc.
 
Primitive Rebels... Oonga bunga?
 
I'm reading Mornings on Horseback by David McCullough. Like the other books I've read by him (John Adams, 1776), it's quite good. And it really is a social history of the (Theodore) Roosevelt family. Which is different than my usual fare, but no less interesting for it. I'm almost halfway through, and Theodore (the future president) is still only a supporting character; his parents have been the primary ones, and his siblings and one of his maternal uncles have figured almost as prominently.

It also has interesting tracts about asthma (which I knew far less about before, not having had any family members with it), and the politics of the late 1870s. Which is a fascinating time in politics, and New York State is the epicenter of why with Roscoe Conkling and (though not so much in this book) Tammany Hall featuring prominently. I've really grown to appreciate the Hayes administration's corruption reform efforts, while also learning much of the greed and corruption of Grant's second term and Conkling. It is indeed a relevant time period in American history for the present day.
 
Is he related to Colleen McCullough?
 
Currently reading Eternal Egypt by Pierre Montet, translated into English by George Weidenfeld.
Actually George Weidenfeld holds the copyright for the translated version but the translator was one Doreen Weightman.
I'm near the end; the translation work is very good. Also the book itself is very good. I highly recommend it.
 
Re Heidegger and the being book, one could hardly use more boring language. It is really making it difficult to read. Even a simple sentence quoted by Aristotle had more life than the (rest of the) entire first chapter.
A first chapter which didn't even need to exist, given Heidegger didn't have to argue that humans are the ones who should be asked about Being. The few tens of pages of said chapter basically have this argument: "humans seem to instinctively have some kind of "grasp" of what Being is, so they are indeed the ones who should be asked of Being, and that general and elusive grasp must be the basis to ask them". No s. Why was this chapter even there? :/
 
Dietary Phosphorus: Health, Nutrition, and Regulatory Aspects is a collection of articles on the role of phosphorus (P) in human bodies. With Western diets, it is excessive P intake that is considered an issue: leading to loss of bone mineralization, cardiovascular calcification, and exacerbating kidney disease. Regulation is hampered by the difficulty of measuring P content, especially in processed foods that have significantly more.

The last few articles concern the environment and the P cycle. While human bodies have too much P, there are problems in shortages in future agriculture. P rock deposits are getting more expensive while runoff at various stages of the cycle worsens the problem. Recommendations are made in improving recycling of P and reducing dependence on animal products, which require vastly more P.

-----

Edible Flowers: A Global History by Constance Kirker and Mary Newman is a short but informative work on the history of flowers used in food. It comes with full-color pictures along with resources such as recipes and websites for those who want to utilize edible flowers in their cooking.
 
just wanted to say your reading material is always super interesting and incredibly diverse. keep posting, please.

on topic: still reading ficciones and while I love the never ending supply of knife fights I somehow feel like the edition I am reading should have been two or even three separate books. The collections "The Garden of Forking Paths" and "Artifices" are some of the finest stories I've read in my life. The version I'm reading is essentially ficciones plus one or two entire books worth of short stories or essays, all of whom are to some degree about knife fights or libraries. Right now I am reading "The Congress".

edit: so I was wondering why it took me so long to be done with this book, since I enjoyed it tremendously and read at decent pace. turns out instead of reading one, I had read eight books in total:

A Universal History of Iniquity
The Garden of Forking Paths
Artifices
The Aleph (perhaps my favorite)
The Maker
In Praise of Darkness
Brodie's Report
The Book of Sand
 
Last edited:
just wanted to say your reading material is always super interesting and incredibly diverse. keep posting, please.

on topic: still reading ficciones and while I love the never ending supply of knife fights I somehow feel like the edition I am reading should have been two or even three separate books. The collections "The Garden of Forking Paths" and "Artifices" are some of the finest stories I've read in my life. The version I'm reading is essentially ficciones plus one or two entire books worth of short stories or essays, all of whom are to some degree about knife fights or libraries. Right now I am reading "The Congress".

edit: so I was wondering why it took me so long to be done with this book, since I enjoyed it tremendously and read at decent pace. turns out instead of reading one, I had read eight books in total:

A Universal History of Iniquity
The Garden of Forking Paths
Artifices
The Aleph (perhaps my favorite)
The Maker
In Praise of Darkness
Brodie's Report
The Book of Sand

"The Congress" should in no way be included in a collection of the "ficciones" :eek:
For a couple of reasons.
It was written literary decades later than the actual Ficciones edition (and its revised version, which included "The South")
More importantly perhaps: The Congress is just a bad story :)

(edit: now saw your list. Yes, that isn't good. Ficciones is one collection - revised a few times, but should only include stuff up to The South, imo. Aleph is the other very good collection. Those that came after the two are really of a lower level, cause Ficciones and Aleph made Borges known - as they should have had. "A universal history of Iniquity" also isn't of the same level, and came before the Ficciones. Not sure if they had The Way to Al-Motashim there; it seems to have been a distinct edition at first, and is a very good story).

Basically: revised "Ficciones" was (afaik) The garden of forking paths & Artifices (maybe also the Al Motashim story thrown in, and The South being the latest in the lot).
 
Last edited:
Can't say I'm encouraged to read Heidegger after Kyriakos's post. My sister has also complained, about how he's her least-favorite German philosopher to read, with similar complaints about blandness. And I believe she's reading the original German versions.

I would be interested in recommendations for philosophers who are accessible for those who considered taking Philosophy 101 many times, but who didn't for various reasons. For references, I've read some Plato and Marx and found both approachable, but Nietzsche (On the Geneology of Morals, specifically) was definitely at the limits of what I could follow, and I'd like to start more accessible than that.

I'm still reading about Teddy, having made slow progress recently, though due to lack of time rather than the material. Probably going to switch to fiction with A Canticle for Leibowitz next.

Is he related to Colleen McCullough?

As far as I can tell, no. They were born a few years apart, but he's American and she's Australian.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom