FeelGood said:
Next to impossible, IMHO. Any resolution on this will get vetoed
Nothing is impossible: as simple as it was to come to Yugoslavia (as well as other places around the world), the same applies here, UNLESS you're happy with all the killings that take place.
War crimes are being commited by both sides here and it's DAMN OBVIOUS for anyone having eyes on his skull. It's the same laws violated that, because of them, Milosevic was taken to a trial, as well as some of his generals.
It's the same crimes the allies did to Dresden and it's the same crimes the nazis made at my country when the resistance killed it's soldiers and they killed whole
civilian villages in revenge.
It's ALSO the same laws that would convict the action of throwing missiles against Israel and killing innocent civilians, and it's the same laws that
could condem the action of throwing missiles(Weapons of Mass Destruction) inside Iraqi markets and neighbourhoods during the last war(I said "could", because those who that use the same laws as an excuse to take action - when they think they're mistreated - it's the same that have NOT signed to promote international justice and freedom, by not signing the international war crime treaties, but, you know what? NO, I don't think I'm that bad of a person because I'm saying things that hurt).
Before anyone thinks I'm trolling here because I'M MENTIONING UGLY THINGS THAT IS A
TABOO TO SPEAK FOR THEM, just look at what bases the examples I mentioned were lead to trial(s). No, double speak is not applied here: either you walk the walk, or better don't speak at all.
Still think that the UN won't have any success? Move NATO in: what the hell, only when OIL is in the middle does it do something, but when it's about human lives behaves like a junkie pimp?
FeelGood said:
IIRC, the first plan was to have Jerusalem under the UN. Since Israel want to make a capital here, they would against this wholly. Another UN solution that is next to impossible looking from current situation.
Let NATO intervene, the good way or the hard way, period. Warn them like 1 month before, like NATO did for other situations at the past, and move in, simple as that.
It's CLEAR TO ANYONE that no matter how fair was for the Jews to have a home at the area they always lived in, that plan has miserably failed, leading to attrocities by each side. That cannot go on forever, and you KNOW WHAT? The UN is
EQUALLY responsible for the crimes commited there because it was the organization that created the new state, so, it has the responsibility to bring an order to the chaos, ONE WAY OR ANOTHER(I may sound hard to Israel, which I als agree it should have a country, but,... enough is enough and those civilians getting killed by both sides are the real victims).
FeelGood said:
As for me, from neutral to palestinians side. So, am I terrorist or condoning terrorism?
I don't know, you tell me: you feel like a terrorist because you support them? If you didn't support them, would you feel like a terrorist? It's easy to say all the time the word "terrorist" for those we find convinient to characterize as such.
Isn't any possibility AT ALL, that an elected goverment, from any country in the world, can commit terrorist acts or attrocities?
How one would characetrize the suicide missions or sniping kids and bulldozing houses and people? How one would describe massive missile launching against Israel aiming civilians and the retaliation against buidlings containing civilian population at Lebanon or targetting buldings supplying electricity and cleaning the water system(crucial to avoid epidemies)?
You know what? Let the the War Crimes' Court decide who's the terorrist and who isn't here, either as goverments or as individuals from both sides: ISN'T WHAT I PROPOSE FAIR ENOUGH? I'm curious why would anyone object to my proposal.