Well, for one thing, the Nazis aren't winning anything because they're long gone. I guess there are still neo-Nazis, but no one really cares about them.cierdan said:At the risk of being ridiculed, I'll say that that's letting the Nazis win just like it's letting the terrorists win by becoming scared, panicked, not doing normal day to day things, etc. Politicians say that that's "letting the terrorists win" if we do that and I say that consigning this mathematical, geometric shape to the Politically Correct Index of Forbidden Shapes is "letting the Nazis win." The Catholic Church had an Index of Forbidden Books. We now have in PC land an Index of Forbidden Shapes!![]()
Am I the only one who sees how crazy and ridiculous this is?
And even if Hitler and his ilk were still alive, and/or you want to consider the neo-Nazis, their goals include such things as exterminating the Jews and preserving the Aryan race, not perverting the swastica. I don't think Hitler, if he revisited the Earth, would be thinking, "YES! They don't like the swastica! My plan worked!" More like he'd be thinking, "NO! There are still Jews!"
And even if Hitler would think the former and not the latter, should we really care? I mean, he wants a fricking symbol, so we might as well let him have it. That is unless: a) The benefits to use the symbol ourselves are considerable. For example, we're considering using the symbol in a play about traditional Hindu culture, and the swastica would be necessary to be historically correct. b) The costs are low. For example, this building the thread is dedicated to: You can't even tell unless you look from above.
If neither of those are the case, deliberately using the swastica just to upset the reincarnated Hitler would be comparable to being confronted by a man who points a gun at your head and wants $10, and you keep your $10 at the cost of your life. (Okay, that's a bit extreme, but you get the idea.) If someone were to have such strong principles that they refuse to let a thug like this hypothetical man win anything---well, I think they're more crazy than admirable.
Now, the victim in the above scenario gave up his life, so to compare the swastica thing with that would only make sense if there are costs to using the swastica. Well, the cost would simply be people getting offended. You might argue that people shouldn't get offended, because it's just a geometric shape. But I think that's completely wrong; it's not just a geometric shape. It is a symbol, and to strip away all meaning from a symbol and just look at its basic shape is completely ignoring one of the things that makes us human (the creation of symbols in the first place). If it's silly to think "evil" when looking at the swastica, is it equally silly to think "America" when looking at the stars and stripes, or to think "wealth" when looking at a green piece of paper with Geoge Washington on it, or to think "Darn, she's taken" when seeing a beautiful woman with a diamond ring on her ring finger?
About terrorism, that's different because it's actually the objective of terrorists to terrorize. If a Westerner is too afraid to go to an airport, Osama, if he's still alive, probably IS thinking, "YES! My plan worked!" And the benefits of going to an aiport are considerable; the same thing goes for the costs of not doing so.
Hehe, I'm not that brave either.cierdan said:To be honest, I would not wear a t shirt like that either for the same kinds of reasons, but SOMEONE has to start wearing them SOMEWHERE and when given the opportunity explain why so that EVENTUALLY people WOULDN'T get offended or it wouldn't cause social interaction to be unpleasant. So some brave souls have to start doing it. I'm not that brave. Maybe YOU are![]()
The thing is, though, that eventually the symbolic meaning of symbols goes away. I doubt the swastica is any exception; I imagine in 250 years no one will think twice after seeing a swastica. Sure, if you, I, and a bunch of other people started wearing swastica T-Shirts, that'd speed up the process, but I don't see any reason to bother doing so.