Angst
Rambling and inconsistent
So uh does an old musician covering new music count as "old" or "new"? 

So uh does an old musician covering new music count as "old" or "new"?
You're missing the point - unless you're just clarifyingThe original version of "Hurt" came out in 1994. Heck, Cash's version is almost 20 years old now.
I would say that anything new to the listener can be called 'new music.' I'm constantly finding old music that's new to me. One of my best discoveries of last year was Spooky Tooth's blues-rock cover of "I Am the Walrus" from 1970. I think it was played over the closing credits of HBO's Watchmen.You're missing the point - unless you're just clarifying
Cash's generation is quite earlier than 1994, after all. I'm not saying Hurt is new today.
I'm always up for a round of "Good Song Covers", if anybody else is game.Reznor was a big fan of how Cash's rendition turned out, too. It's one of my favourite covers (of all time, honestly), and I like the little bits that Cash changed in deference to his faith (and / or to complement how some of the original lyrics would definitely not be considered Christian, hah).
I would say that anything new to the listener can be called 'new music.' I'm constantly finding old music that's new to me. One of my best discoveries of last year was Spooky Tooth's blues-rock cover of "I Am the Walrus" from 1970. I think it was played over the closing credits of HBO's Watchmen.[/spoiler]
I'm always up for a round of "Good Song Covers", if anybody else is game.
Sure, yes. I think we have to add that context matters. I think for the purposes of what this thread is about, a song that's new to us counts as 'new music.' (For that matter, the definition of "old people" is contextual too. In this thread, from the quote in the first post, it's 33 years old.This is actually interesting. There's a link to newness in the temporal, but infact it has much more to do with time of exposition, which can be completely arbitrary.
I don't see why not, as long as their version was released later.Does it count if someone covers a song they wrote for somebody else?
Defining music as in what has always held your interest, if not being your preference no matter what age you are?This article is about why we often lock out musical tastes in at a young age.
Why do old people hate new music? – Holly, age 14, Belmont, Massachusetts
We have a music thread where one can post one's favorite songs of the moment. But if the article holds some truth, then we are likely bound to our pasts in what we like today. I know I am. For all practical purposes music began in Feb 1964 when the Beatles took over radio play and everything else faded into insignificance. The music of the next decade still dominates my musical enjoyment. I still have warms spots for pre-Brit invasion songs by Bobby Vinton, Dion, Gene Pitney, etc. but it is not the same.
Revolution was in the air and in the music; times were changing, music was changing, and Rolling Stone was our guide!
So tell us about your defining music.
https://theconversation.com/why-do-old-people-hate-new-music-123834
Once upon a time, Bach and the rest of them were the "newfangled stuff" that people listened to (so to speak).Ultimately, Cobain or the other stars of the era were not great musicians - any knowledge of music will show that they don't really measure up to a great musician, say Bach - but they weren't just musicians for the teens of the time; they were idols.
You never know what's going to hit you. Prior to my getting hooked on Wuauquikuna last year, my only other exposure to panflute music was Zamfir - a looong time ago.Being someone who's just approaching 23, my music tastes are just about locked in now if that article's right, and started developing back in 2010. Guess I'll be in my 50s talking about early Vocaloid and OSTs from Undertale/Friday Night Funkin'/Pokemon the same way my mother used to talk about the Beatles. I do have every intention of keeping up with new music as I get older but I doubt I'll like it if it's not some combination of electronic, fast, and energetic.
It is noise. I've always considered it just noise.It really rubs me the wrong way when older white people say that hip-hop is just noise. No the rappers I listen to are more cultured than you are Karen
Hm. My teenage years... 1976-1982. I'm honestly blanking on what came out when, that I liked during those years. I did learn how to instantly recognize a John Williams score, and several other well-known composers who worked on SF movies. I know I liked ABBA (my cousin had a couple of tapes, which I listened to and liked), but not obsessively. I've probably listened to more of it during the last couple of years than any other time.Best music in the world is generally whatever you were listening to in your teens or early 20's.
Using science I think they proved modern pop music has become more homogenized as well.
I love 90's rock and metal. Guess when I was a teenager.
I do listen to new music but it's mostly rock and metal coming out of Europe or some 90's bands who can still go.
My entire sense of "contemporary" has always been a bit skewed. As a child, I learned to like what my grandparents and parents liked, and I wasn't born at the time those songs were released.Thread premise is nonsense. I'm 41 and like plenty of new music (and dislike plenty of music from "my era"). It's been shown that in general music is in decline (in complexity, originality, etc) but there is still decent stuff out there if you search for it & there are still a few decent pop songs each year.
Yeah, pretty much. I looked up The Mom & Dads on YT, found a couple of songs, and sat in front of the computer, a blissful smile on my face, while my fingers went through the motions of how I played them myself. The feet didn't, though. I'm not sure I could manage that now.Interesting. My take away from the article was that one's musical taste is mostly set at a young age and those tastes can persist over a life time. As we age we just rationalize why our choices are the best.
I first heard of this during the 1988 Olympics, when the figure skating commentators were reminiscing about the 1984 Olympics, during which Jane Torvill and Christopher Dean won gold, skating their artistic ice dancing program to "Bolero."As for buildup, my favorite slow buildup to exciting climax song is Bolero by Ravel. Good sex track.![]()
That's rather vague. Some kinds of music are indeed not as good as in decades past, because due to electronics it's easier to gloss over people who can't actually sing.Over time, the quality of music has actually dropped.
For some reason, I'm reminded of my arpeggio exercises I had to practice for my music exams.One thing which I almost always find as very artificial and also very unpleasant, is the ridiculously formulaic structure of pop music. Particularly the "bridge" part, which in most songs seems to me to just be there as a forced injection, and often ruins the rest of the song.
Of course you can find the equivalent of bridge sections in classical music too, at times also equally conspicuous, with a similar grating effect (in my view a good example would be Prokofiev's Dance of the Knights, where likely no one cares about the bridge - and Prokofiev was a serious composer). (bridge starts at around 1.53; repeats with minor alteration later on, so possibly it's not a real bridge but has other significance in musical theory)
Iirc the above is part of a ballet, so maybe the bridge there has actual use in practice.
Just think... you could have written songs about Kafka!I played electric guitar (as lead) and only cared about playing 1 million notes/second, instead paying no attention to theory past the most basic scales. So I can see the allure - it's just not as musical. It was one of the reasons why I gave up immediately when university started; I wouldn't have had, if I was actually trained as a musician.
Define "old".Why do new people hate old music?
Now this is what I'm talking about, with Bach and memorization and making the organ an extension of your own body when you play. This guy - I never heard of him before - reminds me of what it's like to be so much in the "zone" that even breathing becomes something that's forgotten because the music is all that exists.Top 5 is not written in stone but here are some pieces:
Pastorale symphony by Beethoven (maybe at the top of my list through the years)
Morgenstemning by Edvard Grieg (Norwegian homer vote)
1812 overture by Tchaikovski (try to find one with real cannons)
Rondo Alla Turca by Mozart (in all honesty anything by Mozart will do)
And finally one that is youtubed just for you:
Some of those hand flourishes are things my own teachers tried to get me to do, but I preferred to keep every scrap of energy for getting my fingers where they needed to go.I know I'm spamming this thread now but this piece is just too brilliant.
Again Gert van Hoef doing magic.
Goosebumps...
And this thread appears to be about music...Yes, we do have a music thread for videos.....
The video is geoblocked.I would say that anything new to the listener can be called 'new music.' I'm constantly finding old music that's new to me. One of my best discoveries of last year was Spooky Tooth's blues-rock cover of "I Am the Walrus" from 1970. I think it was played over the closing credits of HBO's Watchmen.
That reminds me: Another outstanding tool for new music is the website TuneFind. If you hear a song in a television show or a movie that piques your interest, you can search by the title and, if it's a series, by the particular episode.
Spoiler :
Just from the concert vids I've been bingeing this past year, this doesn't seem to be true. Jinjer's Melbourne show, which is on YouTube, was just before the pandemic, and while you can definitely see some (literal) greybeards in the audience, they're amid crowds of younger folk. I was just looking at some vids from the Spiritbox show that was in Chicago last night, but you can't really see the crowd. I'm not really into deathcore, but I don't know if that's an age thing. I do wonder what kind of crowds you'd find at one of the big festivals, Bloodstock or Wacken, or whatever. I just took a quick glance, and Bloodstock is being co-headlined by Jinjer and Judas Priest next month. There could be some OG Priest fans bringing their grandkids.Imagine when I reach 70s, my oldiest but goodies compliation are bands like Megadeth, Metalica, GnR, etc. When I was a youth, I thought as the music progress it becomes more louder and darer, so I think I gonna have a good time sharing new louder music with my kid. But yea, it turned out people now listening to tiktok music, kpop or something along that. While loud music are reserve for older generation that is mostly above 30s.
It is noise. I've always considered it just noise.
I believe the derogatory term "Karen" has already been deemed offensive on this forum, btw.
Just from the concert vids I've been bingeing this past year, this doesn't seem to be true. Jinjer's Melbourne show, which is on YouTube, was just before the pandemic, and while you can definitely see some (literal) greybeards in the audience, they're amid crowds of younger folk. I was just looking at some vids from the Spiritbox show that was in Chicago last night, but you can't really see the crowd. I'm not really into deathcore, but I don't know if that's an age thing. I do wonder what kind of crowds you'd find at one of the big festivals, Bloodstock or Wacken, or whatever. I just took a quick glance, and Bloodstock is being co-headlined by Jinjer and Judas Priest next month. There could be some OG Priest fans bringing their grandkids.![]()
I mean if you don't want to be called Karen keep your ignorant and probably racist opinions to yourself? It's pretty simple
Tatiana.I thought Jinjer is this female vocalist right? she's neat!
Except labels like Karen are used as a slur (just like labels like pinko or do-gooder or label).
What the person actually said or did doesn't matter, they're a Karen so they must be bad.
To be clear, I was not making a universal comment on all possible uses in all possible contexts of the term Karen.
I meant, if you don't want me to call you a Karen in this thread don't post blanket dismissals of an entire genre of music (which, I'm sure completely coincidentally, is a genre of music created by and associated with black people) as "just noise" because you've heard three songs that you didn't like.
Also, just by way of general advice, if you don't want to be called a Karen, best not to allow the people who are calling you a Karen to get a rise out of you. Because, again speaking generally, people calling you Karen probably think that your taking offense at it is extremely funny, and getting angry about it only gives them more incentive to call you Karen so they can screenshot your overwrought reactions and laugh about it with their friends.