Why do you *not* accept evolution?

[Harbringer]

Despite the evidence, no no no no, the proof, of evolution(lab expieraments on what many call "macro evolution", the similarities between chromosomes of various animals especially specietically close ones, the fossil record and a whole list of other evidences and proofs, what is your reasoning for not accepting evolution? Please elaborate why.

 

[gangleri2001]

I accept evolution, why do you assume that I don't?

 

[amadeus]

Because scientists have not explained the creation of a physically evolved, yet mentally incapable creature known as Jimmus Carterus.

 

[Shadylookin]

have you ever seen a creationist? They seem pretty unevolved so that must debunk the theory

 

[pau17]

For anti-evolution stuff, this place has it all:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/

A lot of it is very simply written and poorly argued, and nothing has come close to convincing me...but it's what's out there.

 

[GoodEnoughForMe]

Because I see no reason to.

 

[Harbringer]

Because I see no reason to.

Can you elaborate why?

 

[LightFang]

we havnt seen macroevolution happen so it doesn't happen!!1111

 

[Ecofarm]

Are there lizardmen? No. Centaurs? No. Mermaids? Do you see any mermaids? No.

How much more proof do you need?

This theory is hogwash.

 

[scy12]

Because I hear voices in my head.

 

[kulade]

Jesus told me otherwise...

 

[Birdjaguar]

Despite the evidence, no no no no, the proof, of evolution(lab expieraments on what many call "macro evolution", the similarities between chromosomes of various animals especially specietically close ones, the fossil record and a whole list of other evidences and proofs, what is your reasoning for not accepting evolution? Please elaborate why.

I happen to accept it, but there is no "reason" to accept it as true. A person can live a fine life, earn lots of money, raise a family and leave a legacy without ever believing in evolution. Just because something is true may not be sufficient reason, in and of itself, to accept it as such.

 

[Romanfe]

Because it is wholly irrelevant to my daily life.

 

[Harbringer]

Are there lizardmen? No. Centaurs? No. Mermaids? Do you see any mermaids? No.

How much more proof do you need?

This theory is hogwash.

Sarcasm????

 

[GenMarshall]

I want to make the intellectuals and smartly pants flip!

 

[scy12]

Sarcasm????

Are their Giant Lizards? Giant Squids ? Giant Octapusess ? Of course Not. Evolution is false i tell you.

 

[Harbringer]

Are their Giant Lizards? Giant Squids ? Giant Octapusess ? Of course Not. Evolution is false i tell you.

Why would it be necessary for them to evolve that way?

 

[boarder]

Yes I believe. There is no god.
Then again I have been watching a lot of naked science on Natgeo lately, fascinating programme.

 

[Harbringer]

Yes I believe. There is no god.
Then again I have been watching a lot of naked science on Natgeo lately, fascinating programme.

Meaning no offense, but I don't want this to degrade into an evolution versus creationism thread, there are already plenty of threads for that.

 

[bhsup]

Can it be proven that God did not, as a test of faith when creating the Earth 6K years ago, place fossils, cleverly place layers of sediment, create creatures with similiar DNA, and so forth? There is and will never be any way to prove that all of this "evidence" is nothing more than God setting up the world to look as though everything came about naturally.