Well to be frank with the information in the OT, it would be astounding if we did it right? What a load of cobblers.
Why do you *not* accept evolution?
- Thread starter Harbringer
- Start date
Well to be frank with the information in the OT, it would be astounding if we did it right? What a load of cobblers.
It's a bunch of books, written by different people. So, yes, it was "cobbled" together . . . maybe you meant something else . . .
The sequence of events in Genesis was cobblers (pants, not very good, unreliable, nonsense)
You misunderstood TOE. According to TOE, you didn't come from a monkey but a mythological creature something like Big Foot (except maybe "Little Head") which had two offspring; One went finally went to Harvard while the other went ape.
Some people believes this mythological creature existed while others have serious doubts.
Some people believe he exists because we have found his skeleton. Generally finding something suggests it exists
.
Perfection
The Great Head.
I'm not hung up. It was brought up, and I addressed it. I'll admit, though, that the prospect of it turning into a giant conflagration is not unappealing.
Perfection
The Great Head.
I'll believe it when you stop posting about it.You'll have to argue with yourself then, or admit the fundamentals of maths are wrong or scientists are going about things all wrong, because I've lost interest to be frank.
Not really, 'cuz I'm not arguing that certaintity and uncertainity aren't important concepts in probability and statistics, only that probability and statistics isn't used to find certainties.
Just like they found "Big Foot" footprint. lolSome people believe he exists because we have found his skeleton. Generally finding something suggests it exists
Harbringer
Your A One Flower Garden
Your joking rite?
Perfection
The Great Head.
How is it wrong?
Aegis
Deity
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2005
- Messages
- 3,970
What does life spontaneously springing up in an unopened jar of peanut butter have to do with Evolution?
Evolution says nothing about the origin of life, only the gradual change of organisms that are already alive. It sounds like the preacher is thinking of Abiogenesis, and arguing that Evolution is false because Abiogenesis cannot be proven is pretty stupid. They're two completely different theories independent of one another.
Evolution says nothing about the origin of life, only the gradual change of organisms that are already alive. It sounds like the preacher is thinking of Abiogenesis, and arguing that Evolution is false because Abiogenesis cannot be proven is pretty stupid. They're two completely different theories independent of one another.
Aegis
Deity
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2005
- Messages
- 3,970
This made me laugh pretty heartily:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLqQ...does-it-kirk-cameron-makes-a-fool-of-himself/
Show me a (non-faked) Big Foot skeleton and I'll be the first to accept he exists.
penvzila
Prince
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2001
- Messages
- 362
Wow, here we are in 2008 and Abiogenesis is still a topic?
MobBoss
Off-Topic Overlord
Or it could be that Gods first try was with the dinosaurs and they failed miserably so he sent a comet to wipe them out?
/shrug.
That I could believe in but then the earth wasn't created ~6K years ago.
God can't do something logically inconsistent with his character.
Similar threads
- Poll
- Locked
