The roll out is a disaster and I'm enjoying watching Democrats scurry about.
So no cogent argument, then. Thanks for the clarification.
The roll out is a disaster and I'm enjoying watching Democrats scurry about.
It's right there in the thread title for people that care to expend the energy to read: Will technology accomplish what the GOP could not? I didn't start the thread to start an argument but to ask if the problems of the roll out will force something the GOP could not (a delay in the individual mandate).So no cogent argument, then. Thanks for the clarification.
Stop raising the bar to those ridiculous levelsSo no cogent argument, then. Thanks for the clarification.
It's right there in the thread title for people that care to expend the energy to read: Will technology accomplish what the GOP could not? I didn't start the thread to start an argument but to ask if the problems of the roll out will force something the GOP could not (a delay in the individual mandate).
I brought that up merely as a counterpoint to your complaint that the campaign tech team wasn't involved. They were. What argument was there to be had? You were wrong.The cogent argument ...
I brought that up merely as a counterpoint to your complaint that the campaign tech team wasn't involved. They were. What argument was there to be had? You were wrong.
Both posts aren't mine. I quoted them both since you might have missed them given that they are on the 1st page and all. They both however serve to drive home the point that the campaign tech team was involved despite your claim to the contrary.Surely you can see the inconsistency between the two posts, right?
I heard that Obama was a secret Muslim agent of the Chinese government. I haven't been able to find any confirmation of that however. Just passing it along.EDIT: You seem to refer to my "claim" where I have made none--I have passed along information heard, I am not claiming veracity.
I heard that Obama was a secret Muslim agent of the Chinese government. I haven't been able to find any confirmation of that however. Just passing it along.![]()
My point in this thread is still essentially this:Okay, so maybe that wasn't the best way to express an idea and I should have waited. But do you have anything to respond to the rest of the post? Let's pretend for a moment that I am holding that position to the death irrelevant of what I read. If I don't have a leg to stand on, your two are broken from kicking themselves.
We can also debate the question of this causing more problems than it solves for the law as well. WRT the 1st issue: The recent breaks in the ranks of the DNC seem to be pointing toward the fact a delay of some sort being inevitable if only from a political perspective if the problems continue to persist as long as evidence indicates. The second question seems to be a more open issue at the moment.It's right there in the thread title for people that care to expend the energy to read: Will technology accomplish what the GOP could not? I didn't start the thread to start an argument but to ask if the problems of the roll out will force something the GOP could not (a delay in the individual mandate).
I'm not householder, Antilogic. I can't be responsible if his posts contradict mine. I was merely trying to relieve you the ignorance expressed by the rumor you were passing along. I at least had a source for mine.Looks like the mystery will never be solved.![]()
The truth is that the rumor you were passing along was wrong. I was correcting the record. The campaign tech team was not forbidden from involvement and a contract was given to one of them. Why that snowballed into this I don't know.So, truth doesn't matter, so long as you can post that you "won"?
Credible sources > no sources or some random dude you saw on the street.And if your rumor has a link, it's automatically better?
The truth is that the rumor you were passing along was wrong. I was correcting the record. The campaign tech team was not forbidden from involvement and a contract was given to one of them. Why that snowballed into this I don't know.Credible sources > no sources or some random dude you saw on the street.
Why would they want the 1st bite at the apple to fail this badly? Do you think the public would actually support an increase in governmental control if this attempt fails?Sorry if it has already been mentioned in this thread. But I was thinking today that the democrats intentionally forced a bad roll out of Obama care so they have momentum to scrap all health care as it currently exists in the U.S. and move towards a Canadian or U.K. system.
Yes I know the government is bad, but this bad?
So the government is bad because it contracted out the website development to a private company and private contractors ?
Next you will be telling me about the US Air-forces new jet fighter being privately developed by a private contractor being an Epic Fail, or the new US Navy's new warships being massive huge Fails.
I know you expect this from private US contractors, But OBAMA
![]()