Y2K Nut Nearly Kills Members Of School Board Who Fired His Wife

I think those websites and voices should be shut down because they obviously incite violence and anarchy.

Awesome, your vague and unconstitutional standards of freedom of speech would easily allow the government to suppress any dissident movement, such as the Tea Party movement, merely because there is incendiary rhetoric and a haven for conspiracy theories.
 
I hope those jackboot thug police officers didn't try to shoot this guy. He obviously didn't want to hurt anybody.
After all, both situations were completely identical.

In one, a model student took a classroom hostage and didn't appear to be very interested in actually hurting anybody.

In the other, a nutjob starts directly shooting at people in what appears to be executions. :lol:
 
After all, both situations were completely identical.

In one, a model student took a classroom hostage and didn't appear to be very interested in actually hurting anybody.

In the other, a nutjob starts directly shooting at people in what appears to be executions. :lol:

If those were 'executions' someone was doing it wrong...
 
Haha the idiot was a progressive who followed Media Matters, not an idiot who followed Beck or one of the other "violent gun-loving right wingers". I find it satisfyingly ironic.

I think those websites and voices should be shut down because they obviously incite violence and anarchy.

Strange you ignore Beck, when he openly calls for violent revolution. Consistancy eh?
 
The "irony" is all the reactionaries calling a Y2K nut who collected assault weapons for the invevitable downfall of civilization a "liberal" and a "progressive" merely because he cited a Media Matters article.
 
But you see, if it was a republican he would of merely been called a nut, not a conservative...
 
I must admit it is a bit unusual to find a Y2K "survivalist" who isn't a reactionary.

Then again, there are likely quite a few reactionaries who think that the rich are exploiting them and don't deserve tax breaks, since that obviously isn't an exclusively "leftist" opinion.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-...-splits-in-congress-as-tea-party-ascends.html

The core of the Senate opposition came from fiscally conservative Republicans, such as Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and Jim DeMint of South Carolina, and Democrats who oppose extending tax breaks for the wealthy, including Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Tom Harkin of Iowa. In the House, that same sort of mismatched group is complicating passage prospects.

More broadly, the obstacles facing the legislation exposed internal tensions in both parties, highlighting the difficulties their leaders will face building coalitions in a new Congress in which Democrats control the Senate while Republicans lead the House. In the House, Republicans gained the majority in part because of new members swept into office in November’s elections on a wave of support from fiscally conservative Tea Party activists.

“Republicans will have to manage a Tea Party caucus that feels free to fight against leadership,” said Brian Darling, director of Senate relations at the Heritage Foundation, a Washington-based group that promotes limited government. “And the Tea Party wants action more than just talk.”
 
The "irony" is all the reactionaries calling a Y2K nut who collected assault weapons for the invevitable downfall of civilization a "liberal" and a "progressive" merely because he cited a Media Matters article.

Are conservatives usually known to cite those articles from Media Matters?

Just asking.

Then again, there are likely quite a few reactionaries who think that the rich are exploiting them and don't deserve tax breaks, since that obviously isn't an exclusively "leftist" opinion.

But thats not the topic of this thread.
 
:lol:

Do you really think Beck was being serious?

I thought liberals used explosive vest and flew planes into buildings ?
Only Republicans use guns, its the "real" American way.
 
The "irony" is all the reactionaries calling a Y2K nut who collected assault weapons for the invevitable downfall of civilization a "liberal" and a "progressive" merely because he cited a Media Matters article.
Maybe he was one of those peak oil types.
 
Well if this guy was a liberal, Hitler was still a conservative.
 
In one, a model student took a classroom hostage and didn't appear to be very interested in actually hurting anybody.

When you take a classroom hostage with a gun, people kinda react like your gonna shoot them up.
 
The lady who hit the gunman with her purse should count her lucky stars.
 
Back
Top Bottom