Zack Mafia IV: Birthday Bash [GAME THREAD]

I'm baffled if I know what triggers your voting, Zack.
 
*facepalm* Yet another person who just votes on flimsy excuses.
 
So much talk, so few votes. It's nice to have the thread active, but all the non-discussion is making it hard to find the content. If there is any...

Vote: Buddhafish for pushing others to vote for inactives. I'd be willing to change this, once the day has more content and less fluff.
FoS: spaceman for following.
 
It's an indirect OMGUS you're doing there, Dave-o.
 
You vote withing two minutes of each other and suddenly DaveShack takes the lead…

vote: GhostWriter16, third on bandwagon is mafia; Fish Finger of Suspicion: Dreadnought.

What evident pattern emerging? You're creating the pattern yourselves.
See here, the votes were:

DaveShack 2 (CivCube; SamSniped)
johnhughthom 1 (Martin Luther)
Takhisis 1 (Visorslash)
Visorslash 2 (Dumanios; Zack)
Mat93 1 (Buddhafish)
Buddhafish 1 (DaveShack)​
Now with your two votes:
DaveShack 4 (CivCube; SamSniped; GhostWriter16; Dreadnought)
johnhughthom 1 (Martin Luther)
Takhisis 1 (Visorslash)
Visorslash 2 (Dumanios; Zack)
Mat93 1 (Buddhafish)
Buddhafish 1 (DaveShack)​
Why this sudden urge to save Visorslash? oh wait, he's the easiest of the three of you to lynch, and he's also reacted badly to scummicity tests.
unvote; vote: Visorslash.

My FFos remains on GhostWriter16 and Dreadnought, but Visorslash's the most lynchable of your trio.
 
So much talk, so few votes. It's nice to have the thread active, but all the non-discussion is making it hard to find the content. If there is any...

Vote: Buddhafish for pushing others to vote for inactives. I'd be willing to change this, once the day has more content and less fluff.
FoS: spaceman for following.

Wait what? What did I do? Vote: johnhughthom because their is a sizable wagon on Dave and johnhughthom still seems scummy. His "defense" is difficult to confirm and still seems suspicious.
 
I have no idea what's going on, so my vote is meaningless.
Your voting on the heels of another person to put someone into a two-vote lead is preposterous and throws away your little attempt at justification. It's not a meaningless vote and we both know it.

Your excuses are bad, and you should feel bad.
 
a) you're failing flinch-tests
b) why do you only vote people who're already voted?
 
Back
Top Bottom