I'm just as much at a loss about which place both ended up you're talking about.One just got to the same place faster than the other, is all. But back to the new mayor: if some Dutch guy thinks Mamdani needs to be cut quite a bit of slack because he smartly put "democratic" in front of "socialist", well no, I don't see why; as I'd rather wait to judge his results.
Something you wanna share with the class?Muslim armchair socialist in charge of NY. I'll have a big bucket of popcorn with that. And I don't even like popcorn.
Muslim armchair socialist in charge of NY. I'll have a big bucket of popcorn with that. And I don't even like popcorn.
actually, that about sums it up.Something you wanna share with the class?
new sig?foremost child of marxist tyranny
it's tempting nglnew sig?
So we're two for two on people in this thread who can't differentiate between Welfare Capitalism and Stalinism.actually, that about sums it up.
So we're two for two on people in this thread who can't differentiate between Welfare Capitalism and Stalinism.
While I’ve only scratched the surface of what entails. There is somewhat of a difference between Marxist-Leninism (which I actively oppose) and Democratic Socialism. Speaking anadodacally, The word Socialism has baggage that’s been attached to it since the First Red Scare a century ago as a synonym for “authoritarian communism” (e.g. Marxist-Leninism and Maoism).If you want to subdivide this by authoritarian (Soviet-style) socialism vs. democratic socialism, I guess we can do that. Though personally I don't see much difference in their ultimate outlooks.
While I’ve only scratched the surface of what entails. There is somewhat of a difference between Marxist-Leninism (which I actively oppose) and Democratic Socialism. Speaking anadodacally, The word Socialism has baggage that’s been attached to it since the First Red Scare a century ago as a synonym for “authoritarian communism” (e.g. Marxist-Leninism and Maoism).
No argument there, tankies like MLs don't really like SocDems. Degrading them as "social fascists".ML types dont like Socual democrat types lol.
And all this time I thought it were the muslim extremists that hated america.Bush did 9/11 so idk what they're all freaking out about?
It's not going to be pretty.Muslim armchair socialist in charge of NY. I'll have a big bucket of popcorn with that. And I don't even like popcorn.
Well, at least Trump empowers bigots to speak out.It's not going to be pretty.
It's the worst blend of awful.
Something you wanna share with the class?
Enjoy the freedom of speech while you can.Well, at least Trump empowers bigots to speak out.
So we can know them.
history, learn, repeatHere, help yourself.
On a more serious note, most of his policies boil down to the armchair handout socialism. Which doesn't really work. It gives the wrong incentives. Best example is his intended 4% corporate tax hike. Sounds good...but in practice, every time someone tried this, it resulted in even less tax revenue than before, because a lot of modern business is quite mobile when it comes to where it's going to pay taxes. So the net result is corporate flight.
I'm not saying that taxing the rich more is a bad thing, but because of the mobility of the wealth in modern world, it needs to be done internationally. At very least, you'd need US, EU, China, India and the Arab oil states to agree on it and use their economic leverage to force the rest of the world into the scheme. All a NY mayor can do is to drive the corporations away.
Reference required. I have had a look, these economists sure like obfuscating their data but I think this is saying that increasing corporate tax rate increases tax revenue.in practice, every time someone tried this, it resulted in even less tax revenue than before