Because We Have a (Serious) Problem: 2016 Battleground States

Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
15,602
Building off downtown's thread, let's talk about which states we think will be the swing states, tossup states, and the tipping point in the 2016 presidential election. I'm noting the EVs in parentheses for ease of reference.

Tipping Point

The tipping point in 2008 and 2012 was Colorado (9), but given the demographic trends and strengthening local Democratic party, the tipping point could fall to Virginia (13), the runner-up in 2008, or Pennsylvania (20) or Ohio (18), the runners-up in 2012. If the Republicans hold the line with Hispanics or improve their standing, Colorado will likely hold its position.

The Current Swing States

I think Nevada (6) is likely to fall off the list of serious swing states unless the Republicans make serious progress in bridging the divide with Hispanic voters. Colorado (9) is also in this category--it's worth marginally more to contest since they lost it by slimmer margins and it has 50% more EVs. With limited resources, the Republican strategic choice is clear.

Iowa (6) will always be a swing state because campaigns get their start there--until that changes, it will be contested despite its social-moderate attitude and going Democratic in something like 6 of the last 7 elections--yes, it even went for Dukakis. Very similar case with New Hampshire (4), only it's 5/7 since it didn't vote for Dukakis. A socially moderate Republican has a shot at both of these, though.

Ohio (18) will likely remain a perennial battleground state, as will Florida (29). The parties both have strong local operations. Not much to say here besides duh, obvious.

Virginia (13) looks like it is trending more Democratic, leap-frogging other classic swing states like OH and FL. But it's still close and the Republicans can't afford to lose it; it's definitely in the mix for 2016.

North Carolina (15) will remain a swing state--it's the only serious swing state Obama lost in 2012, and he only lost it by 2ish points. The Democrats will try again, I'm sure.

Michigan (16), Wisconsin (10), Minnesota (10)... why were these considered swing states in the last election when they went for Democrats by more than six points? And Michigan nearly 10? Seriously, Georgia (16) was closer than Michigan and yet nobody called it a swing state.

New Swing States & Outside Possibilities

Pennsylvania (20) has long been the target of Republican last-minute campaign stops, but it's been reliably Democratic except in landslides. However, the Dems are starting to lose ground in the suburbs and the rural areas are voting even more strongly Republican, so if it is contested from the start in 2016 by a moderate Republican, it could be a legitimate swing state. Wisconsin (10) and Minnesota (10) are similar to the Pennsylvanian fools' gold, only with a stronger Democratic margin and thus a steeper hill to climb. I wouldn't count on all three, but PA and WI could be more swingy if the Republicans have a strong candidate and the Dems a weak one.

New Jersey (14) might make it to the swing state list if Chris Christie is the Republican nominee. Otherwise, I think it stays in the Republican camp. And even if it makes it to the swing list, I think it will lean Democratic.

Arizona (11) and Texas (38) are Democratic wet dreams in 2016. Although Arizona has a rapidly increasing Latino population and a growing urban population where the Dems should make gains, they also have a lot of old retirees moving into the state and a strong local Republican party that stave off the trends that flipped their neighbors. So long as Arpaio can win elections, it's staying in the Republican camp. Demographic trends may make Texas a good target for the Dems by 2024, but 2016 is too soon. They will be talked about early in the campaign, but will ultimately stay Republican unless it's a more massive landslide than in 2008.

Indiana (11) was a shocker in 2008, and with the exception of a rape gaffe looked like it was trending strongly Republican in 2012. I wouldn't count on the Senate upset as indicative of a shift, especially since the Republicans should avoid poor-quality candidates for national offices in the future. Likely to remain Republican in 2016 unless there is big landslide (although slightly less massive than for AZ and TX). Missouri (10) is similar.

My Final 2016 List

So here's what I think we will be watching election night 2016, if the race is reasonably close:

The Key States:
Florida (29)
Ohio (18)
North Carolina (15)
Virginia (13)
Colorado (9)
Iowa (6)
New Hampshire (4)

Basically, take off Nevada and the Great Lakes, and the last 3 are a little more iffy.

Additional States for Trendline-Watching:
Texas (38)
Pennsylvania (20)
Georgia (16)
Arizona (11)
Wisconsin (10)
Minnesota (10)

These are my honorable mentions, so to speak, and could also be considered 2020/2024 swing state candidates.
 
My folks will be shocked to see the campaign commercials in Georgia, I'll tell you that much.

EDIT: There have been some ridiculous swings in Alaska (3) in the Democrats' favor and Montana (3) might be like New Jersey if their favorite son runs. Maybe I should have added those to the honorable mentions list. Maybe not.
 
I know more about American politics than Canadian politics... it's way more entertaining! I guess I should probably get slapped for that by a hockey player or something, but I think a lot of other Canadians are in the same boat.

I didn't exactly follow any of the elections incredibly closely, but I followed the last one closely enough. I understand the dynamics of the electoral college and what it takes to win.

Any chance of the Republicans having a competent candidate next time around?
 
New Jersey (14) might make it to the swing state list if Chris Christie is the Republican nominee. Otherwise, I think it stays in the Republican camp. And even if it makes it to the swing list, I think it will lean Democratic.

Disagree. I don't think blue states swing for red governors. Also I think you mean Democrat camp. Outside of Chicago the strongest Democratic machine is in NJ.

Indiana (11) was a shocker in 2008, and with the exception of a rape gaffe looked like it was trending strongly Republican in 2012. I wouldn't count on the Senate upset as indicative of a shift, especially since the Republicans should avoid poor-quality candidates for national offices in the future. Likely to remain Republican in 2016 unless there is big landslide (although slightly less massive than for AZ and TX). Missouri (10) is similar.

Indianan is generally red yes but it can go blue without much compunction. Theres a 538 article on it's 'Throw out the bums' habit.
 
Disagree. I don't think blue states swing for red governors. Also I think you mean Democrat camp. Outside of Chicago the strongest Democratic machine is in NJ.

You are right, meant to say Democratic camp or lean-Democratic in the OP. Sorry, bad typo on my part.

I figure if a blue state will ever swing for a red governor, Chris Christie is the governor to try it. If that makes sense. No guarantee of success.

Any chance of the Republicans having a competent candidate next time around?

I'm keeping the candidate talk in DT's thread, although I have noted several places that could be competitive with a good Republican candidate.
 
It would be a significant aberration. Party identification is stronger than in state elections.
 
I'm ok with Iowa being a swing state for one more election, wanna actually get involved next round :D
 
So political discussion in America is pretty much talking about who will win The Next Elections, and never working on any actual issues. Got it.
 
I don't want to live in a battleground state! :cry:

Just think, a generation of Virginians will arise for whom this is entirely normal. They won't know that things don't have to be this way, that people in other states don't have to deal with crap like that. This was how my life went. I remember in Kindergarten knowing that George Bush and Al Gore were the two options for President, and that whom you voted for was a damn big deal, because this is Ohio. I'm not sure we could have it any other way.

Also, can we please prefix all 2016 election threads with "Because we have a problem" up until the date of the election? It would be awesome.
 
Hey I wish I lived in a battleground state. You guys get all the good political jobs, all the sexy media attention, all the sexy campaign donations and such things. Up here in the true blue states we aint got nothing except the New York media market.

Which is something....
 
I am the luckiest voter. I get to cast a ballot in Ohio without having to view TV in November.
 
Indianan is generally red yes but it can go blue without much compunction. Theres a 538 article on it's 'Throw out the bums' habit.

Not really. It's voted for only 1 Democrat since 1964 for a reason, and that (2008) was kind of a fluke year with a semi-local politician.

Indiana's organized labor is unique in that it's actually fairly conservative, as is their teacher base, so the state really doesn't have much in the way of base Democratic constituencies, seeing how white it is. Some of the Indy suburbs, however, have the highest R Cook scores in the country.

Dems can win statewide races in Indiana, but I don't think it's worth it for a Dem presidential candidate to bother spending any time or energy there.

As for states, I legitimately think Arizona will be a swing state this cycle.
 
I am the luckiest voter. I get to cast a ballot in Ohio without having to view TV in November.

I might move my residence to Montana though for the permanent licence plates :(
 
I am the luckiest voter. I get to cast a ballot in Ohio without having to view TV in November.
That is the goal come college. Although I'll probably still have to see them on summer break I guess, but they won't be at their peak.
I might move my residence to Montana though for the permanent licence plates :(
Didn't they swing for Obama in 2008? And they elected Gov. Schweitzer. Although with three electoral votes, they can't really become a proper swing state even if they do start trending more Democratic.
 
So political discussion in America is pretty much talking about who will win The Next Elections, and never working on any actual issues. Got it.

There are other threads about that. Also, USA #1!

Also, can we please prefix all 2016 election threads with "Because we have a problem" up until the date of the election? It would be awesome.

I was going to use variations on that theme to reference DT's thread. Please join in!

I am the luckiest voter. I get to cast a ballot in Ohio without having to view TV in November.

I might be taking a job that will land me in Ohio for the 2014 midterms, might move on before 2016.

Didn't they swing for Obama in 2008? And they elected Gov. Schweitzer. Although with three electoral votes, they can't really become a proper swing state even if they do start trending more Democratic.

Not quite--Montana was talked about as a tossup after the economic crash, but McCain won it. It's one of the few swing states he won (although he lost all the originals).

Montana is kind of weird in that it is the anti-South. Democrats can and are winning some local and statewide elections while the state goes Republican in national elections, much like the modern South. However, Montana started off as a pure Republican state back in the old days (the Republican base was in New England and the West), while the South started off as solidly Democratic (pre-civil rights era).

Right now, Montana has a Democratic governor, two Democratic senators, and an at-large Republican representative. That seems to imply the right kind of Democrat can flip the state, given all of these elections are statewide and the Dems are carrying 3 out of the 4.
 
Subscription post

Seriously, Georgia (16) was closer than Michigan and yet nobody called it a swing state.

Elasticity is the thing though. My impression of the state is this: The (black) dems in Georgia will vote D no matter what, the (white) Republicans there will vote GOP no matter what, and there's more Rs than Ds, so the GOP will hold it for a while.

*Ignoring other demographics which might be D for a moment, but these are all probably strictly partisan voters.
 
Elasticity is the thing though. My impression of the state is this: The (black) dems in Georgia will vote D no matter what, the (white) Republicans there will vote GOP no matter what, and there's more Rs than Ds, so the GOP will hold it for a while.

*Ignoring other demographics which might be D for a moment, but these are all probably strictly partisan voters.

That's true, but I don't think Michigan has been significantly more elastic than Georgia in recent years (don't have the data in front of me at the moment). And at least in Georgia there is a significantly growing urban population (the Atlanta metropolitan area has nearly half the population of the state and growing, although its suburbs are still split between Democrats and Republicans) and a significantly growing Hispanic population that should at least warrant some national coverage (if not equivalent to Michigan). And yet the only thing I can find on it are the occasional blog postings and a handful of clips of MSNBC's Chuck Todd putting forth the hypothesis it could be competitive in 2016 and 2020. As far as I can tell, it hasn't been reported on Fox, CNN is largely ignoring it, and so on.
 
Not quite--Montana was talked about as a tossup after the economic crash, but McCain won it. It's one of the few swing states he won (although he lost all the originals).

Montana is kind of weird in that it is the anti-South. Democrats can and are winning some local and statewide elections while the state goes Republican in national elections, much like the modern South. However, Montana started off as a pure Republican state back in the old days (the Republican base was in New England and the West), while the South started off as solidly Democratic (pre-civil rights era).

Right now, Montana has a Democratic governor, two Democratic senators, and an at-large Republican representative. That seems to imply the right kind of Democrat can flip the state, given all of these elections are statewide and the Dems are carrying 3 out of the 4.

Interesting stuff. Shows what I get for not Googling. I suppose it could feasibly become a swing state if things get really close. Schweitzer could probably get it if he winds up on the ticket.
 
Back
Top Bottom