Aaron russo on the 9-11 inside job
- Thread starter SLAAKMAN
- Start date
- Status
You surely have my attention...
He got shot.
You seem to have a slight case of dyslexia. That video says something else than you do. (Compare the ill-chosen title with the actual quote. I know it's a pain, but just try.)
sophie
Break My Heart
I'm trying to understand how that quote is structured; there's one open-quote and two end-quotes, so it's really hard to tell what part of the "quotation" is the actual quotation and which part is the editorializing by the video's author. Rather fitting, really.
Thanks, agent.
No problem:
Actually, theres only one quote:
"I don't believe for a minuet we got everything right"
Even while this is a typical quote taken out of context, it's clear to the careful reader that the conclusion here simply is
"We may not have gotten everything right"
Now if you're a conspiracy theorist that reads like
"I don't believe the conclusions we drew" (title of video)
which, unfortunately, is not what's being meant at all. (It's also nonsensical, but that never stops a conspiracy theorist.)
So the title is not 'very fitting' except to a conspiracy theorist. But to a conspiracy theorist everything is fitting that suits the conspiracy theory. And everything to the contrary is not fitting, so it is omitted. (The typical modus operandi of the average creationist.)
You're welcome. It often helps to point out the seemingly obvious.
Actually, theres only one quote:
"I don't believe for a minuet we got everything right"
Even while this is a typical quote taken out of context, it's clear to the careful reader that the conclusion here simply is
"We may not have gotten everything right"
Now if you're a conspiracy theorist that reads like
"I don't believe the conclusions we drew" (title of video)
which, unfortunately, is not what's being meant at all. (It's also nonsensical, but that never stops a conspiracy theorist.)
So the title is not 'very fitting' except to a conspiracy theorist. But to a conspiracy theorist everything is fitting that suits the conspiracy theory. And everything to the contrary is not fitting, so it is omitted. (The typical modus operandi of the average creationist.)
You're welcome. It often helps to point out the seemingly obvious.
sophie
Break My Heart
So why the floating quotation mark at the end? Obviously it's a conspiracy to smear the 9/11 commission
Link to video.[/QUOTE]
@Owen, Agent: are you guys out of your mind? So many commisioners say that the commision was set up to fail, that they didnt have excess to the needed information and there was no proper criminal investigation carried out and you are talking about quotation marks? If only half what is in the video were true it would be beyond scandalous and totally unacceptable.
Who are you people? Do they have free internet acces in mental asylums in your country these days?
Bugfatty300
Buddha Squirrel
Well, that would explain the all the Truther spam on the internet.
But generally I think most are duped or trolling but not actually insane.
warpus
Sommerswerd asked me to change this
Nah, most people are just plain crazy.
This accurately describes anyone who accepts and uses the perjorative smear, "conspiracy theorist".
Yeah we should never tolerate outrageous things. Well guess what Backstabbing-Bushie-baby....Im theorizing anyway!
Link to video.
Not really.
You somehow failed to notice you're on a conspiracy theory thread? Check the post below mine: it's written in colour. You know, like in a children's book.
You somehow failed to notice you're on a conspiracy theory thread? Check the post below mine: it's written in colour. You know, like in a children's book.
Until some one who participated in the event comes clean, it will always be "just another conspiracy theory".
The basic facts of 9/11 were witnessed by thousands and watched by millions.
That would be a No on both counts. And since you mention, I'm still waiting for any new facts. Somehow I doubt any such facts will surface. In the meantime this isn't even 'old news', it's just old.
But to stay on children's book level: all the culprits died, the US got all 'patriotic' (the euphemism for curbing civil liberties and acting xenophobic) and the man who approved the attacks got murdered years later.
And like JFK's murder it will continue to sprout conspiracy theories for years to come. Which is good for conspiracy theorists, but overall doesn't help anybody.
In the meantime Iraq got disastrously invaded (which had nothing to do with it) and we're still dealing with the mess that resulted in. Also a fruitful ground for conspiracy theories.
In short, it's conspiracy theories all around.
But sure, I'll happy to address any new facts should they surface.
I just wanted to facilitate your element. (Colorized to emphasize the beauty of purple. Hope you enjoy it).
Predicatbly, you've smugly failed to address the facts. I think they call that "trolling"?
That would be a No on both counts. And since you mention, I'm still waiting for any new facts. Somehow I doubt any such facts will surface. In the meantime this isn't even 'old news', it's just old.
But to stay on children's book level: all the culprits died, the US got all 'patriotic' (the euphemism for curbing civil liberties and acting xenophobic) and the man who approved the attacks got murdered years later.
And like JFK's murder it will continue to sprout conspiracy theories for years to come. Which is good for conspiracy theorists, but overall doesn't help anybody.
In the meantime Iraq got disastrously invaded (which had nothing to do with it) and we're still dealing with the mess that resulted in. Also a fruitful ground for conspiracy theories.
In short, it's conspiracy theories all around.
But sure, I'll happy to address any new facts should they surface.
No need for new facts. The current evidence is overwhelming.
Oh thank you for such enlightening foresight.
How would you know that?
Golly what a coincidence, eh? It couldnt have been planned ahead of the attack could it? Naah.
Who? Rockefeller? Bush? Cheney? Wolfowitz? Silverstein? Your factual assumption is false.
I thrive on mysteries. No sweat off my back to trace the facts to their logical conclusion.
Why hasnt the Democratic Party pressed for Bush & Cheneys indictments? Couldnt be any collusion there, nope. Duh.
You'll have to try harder. The facts lead right to the perpetrators.
- Status
