Joij21
🔥Deny, Defend, Depose!🔥
I want change just disagree on how to do it.
In USA that means rearguard action and wait 10-20 years. The goals are not achieveable in the short term.
Yes they are, if you storm the Supreme Court.
I want change just disagree on how to do it.
In USA that means rearguard action and wait 10-20 years. The goals are not achieveable in the short term.
I want change just disagree on how to do it.
In USA that means rearguard action and wait 10-20 years. The goals are not achieveable in the short term.
Yes they are, if you storm the Supreme Court.
Cool so people will die and suffer and you've got jack crap to offer them in terms of ameliorating or even preventing that.
Just. Vote.
Stop using incendiary rhetoric,alienating people, focus on a few things instead of huge lists of wishy washy ideas etc.
Right wing is very easy it's mostly two things.
1. Tax cut. It's always tax cuts.
2. Owning the libs.
Repulsive but nice and simple. Americans need simple.
And how did that work out for Jan 6 lot who tried something similar.
You've got nothing to offer those on the ground but meaningless platitudes.
How is any of your advice helpful to a person who needs an abortion but can no longer access it @Zardnaar
And why does your sole contribution to the topic amount to "wait it out", that's not advice, its not even helpful to those living with the issue every day
You appear to be laboring under the illusion that anyone has a right to take an innocent lifeYou appear to be laboring under the illusion that it's anyone's business but the person who is making the decision to have an abortion
See, I'm not a fan of killing the innocent because I consider another human life inconvenientSee, I'm not a fan of forcing people to give birth when they don't want to,
My first post in this thread is on page 11. If you're genuinely looking for clarification, you're welcome to read everything I've written. I'm not too interested in re-writing everything I've already writtennot so sure about you though, feel free to clarify!
And not just storm the Supreme Court, but assault the capital of Mississippi as well since they are the state that started this.
I hear Kentucky is also another state that has a trigger law in place and is home of Mitch McConnell. What better way than to sack and raze the state of Washington's most evil and corrupt turtle?
You appear to be laboring under the illusion that anyone has a right to take an innocent life
See, I'm not a fan of killing the innocent because I consider another human life inconvenient
My first post in this thread is on page 11. If you're genuinely looking for clarification, you're welcome to read everything I've written
Well the army and national guards get to vote in those situations. Places well known for liberal viewpoints.
You appear to be laboring under the illusion that anyone has a right to take an innocent life
See, I'm not a fan of killing the innocent because I consider another human life inconvenient
My first post in this thread is on page 11. If you're genuinely looking for clarification, you're welcome to read everything I've written
That think you're doing, when you tell people to just deal with it? We all use "incendiary rhetoric" based on the perspective of the people it's being directed at.Stop using incendiary rhetoric,alienating people
You're conflating Church and state, by the by. You may find this appeal works less on people with different belief systems, much less people who have can demonstrate that in fact society accepts this on a daily basis (like Senethro just pointed out).You appear to be laboring under the illusion that anyone has a right to take an innocent life
We kill the innocent every day and don't seize resources, property or blood/bodyparts in order to prevent so. Therefore, killing the innocent (or permitting them to die and blaming them for being poor) is an acceptable and barely even questioned standard in our society.
Therefore, why do you advocate for this special standard of seizing bodies of an actual person for the use of a hypothetical person?
That think you're doing, when you tell people to just deal with it? We all use "incendiary rhetoric" based on the perspective of the people it's being directed at.
You should perhaps consider why you find it alienating. Because you don't seem to consider why people might find yours similar.
You're conflating Church and state, by the by. You may find this appeal works less on people with different belief systems, much less people who have can demonstrate that in fact society accepts this on a daily basis (like Senethro just pointed out).
Ahhhh, such a short time ago that a statement like this could be read only as a joke because of how implausible it was!Then rise up! Storm the Court! Stop talking about this and take physical action NOW!!!