It really irks me because the science behind a star suddenly (in galactic terms) going supernova is completely absent. It reeks of Abrams penchant for scientific malfeasance.I'm fine with it, mostly because I'm excited that the franchise is finally moving forward again after being stuck in what felt like an endless wave of nostalgia and rehashing of timelines and stories.I didn't really like that the event surrounding the start of the Kelvin timeline (i.e. the destruction of Romulus) has now been "officially" canonized into the prime timeline.
It actually makes sense for the Romulans though, given that everything they do is supposedly clouded in intrigue and mystery.
Spoiler :Also the zero mention of Lal and Lore seems a bit strange in a world where the daystrom institute desperately wanted to replicate Data. I mean what happened to their parts after they were disassembled? B4 was in a drawer so where's the Lal and Lore drawers haha?
First thought was.. did the writers forget them?.. but that seems unlikely consider they brought Hugh back which means they clearly remember Descent 1 & 2 which Lore was in. The whole Daughter 2.0 storyline suggests the Lal episode is something they know too. Plus Frakes directed that one and he's involved in Picard.
Bad knees are a fact of ageing, however advanced we'll be, so it seems entirely appropriate that a very old man would have creaky joints, especially as the Federation has long banned genetic resequencing and only breaks out cybernetics for serious injuries.