Altered Maps 3: The rise of the Basque Empire!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Also, i'm copying and pasting my Africa map from the last thread:

vnnznk.png


And the actual Africa for comparison:
Spoiler :
p6bgk.png


I want to fix up the saharan borders, make them more like lines, cause they look ******** at the moment. I think the Taureg have their borders extended over 50 or so miles at one point just to include one small village.
----------
I will continue working when i get my compter back from the container which i think will come this week.

Also, i found a map here in my new house, from my family that previously ran the buisness at this hosue (they are moving to a new location and will continue work at the camp) that shows a map by national geographic of all the native american tribes of South America!

I will make a similar map to the African one, but with grouping up of similar South American tribes into states.

Could you scan and post said map? That would be very helpful :goodjob:
 
It'd be hard to, do you see the desk your computer is on? The map is roughly the same size as that, framed.

The map is from National Geographic, perhaps you can find one on the internet? It is called "Indians of South America".
 
It'd be hard to, do you see the desk your computer is on? The map is roughly the same size as that, framed.

The map is from National Geographic, perhaps you can find one on the internet? It is called "Indians of South America".

I found it, but only in a very small, illegible size :(

Here's a link to a site where you can zoom. http://www.maps.com/map.aspx?pid=15658
 
I found it, but only in a very small, illegible size :(

Here's a link to a site where you can zoom. http://www.maps.com/map.aspx?pid=15658

Yes, mines the same, except a different edition i think. It still shows the same stuff, except the map is in different shades of blue, which is kinda annoying. I can't tell the difference between what is red and orange on the map you linked and you can't find the coast on the Incan side as they made Incan color light blue which looks the same as white. :lol:

Actually thanks for linking that, cause now i don't have to ask my aunt to keep the map, and looking it of the computer is easier for me than of the wall.
 
ColdWar41975-1979.png


Cold War 1975 - 1979

The German Civil War was lost to the Czarists by 1976, and the aging Czar of Russia - now 62 - was growing weary of the conflict. Tired of wasting resources on a war that was going nowhere, the Czar bullied the German Emperor into formally surrendering to the Dutch and Danish resistance movements, which parted with much of their occupied territory for independence. To get WEDO's proxies out of the conflict, the Alsatian Republic was soon bribed away as well, before being absorbed into France in 1977.

Within a few months, the Czar had also cut the Rhenish Republic loose, and after a short campaign against Bavaria to acquire a bit more territory, made peace with them as well.

WEDO completely removed itself from the conflict after the Czar gave Italy South Tyrol. And with good strategy and propoganda, the Western Germans were defeated.

With the de facto end of the war - though small partisan groups kept fighting - the Czar began to rebuild his empire.

Germany was dissolved at the formal peace accords in 1977 - the Czar had always had a wet dream of weakening and subordinating his "ally." It was split into the Rhineland, Prussia(close to it's pre-unification borders), Bavaria, and Austria, whereas many areas were seized by foreign powers. Bohemia was severed from Germany and annexed into Russia as part of the Pan-Slavic initiative. Italy and France annexed their respective territories, while the Netherlands and Denmark became independent anew. German-occupied England was transferred to England proper so as to make Prussia more stable, as well as for Russia to gain favor with the English.

Prussia's Kaiser found himself limited as the Constitution was altered so many of the advisors were appointed by the Russian Czar to "ensure the prosperity of the Prussian Kingdom." Large amounts of pro-Russian immigrants arrived as part of the treaty, acquiring lands that had been left without owernship due to war deaths. Those who were pro-Russian within Prussia found themselves injected with cash and assets, while suffrage increasingly depended on economic well-being; both the Kaiser and the Reichstag were being controlled by pro-Russian elements with these reforms.

Poland, as a Slavic territory, knew the guillotine was ready to come down on the short-lived revival. All Prussia east of the Oder River was ceded to Russia as thanks for preserving the Kaiser's position. Poland was soon annexed in the aftermath.

East Prussia was put under joint Prussian-Russian administration as an independent condominium, due to being "of great economic importance to both countries." It was henceforth known as the Republic of Konigsberg.

---

Prussia managed to maintain it's vast overseas empire, but increasingly Russia was taking direct administration over the new territories.

Central Europe soon became a battlefield as the Cold War combatants fought over who had what. The French seized the Netherlands, Denmark, and the Rhineland as friends, whereas Russia acquired Austria and Bavaria. The Russian Onslaught had pushed even further West, and many feared if Nicholas had the guts to risk nuclear war to push further.


====

In the Americas, the USA completed it's Pan-American alliance through formal treaties with Argentina and Bolivia. It soon extended these treaties to Iceland, desiring to get a stake in Europe.

===

The German Civil War greatly altered the balance of power. Russia proper had expanded, at the expense of it's ally. Even with the fall of Germany, the majority of the former German Empire was within Russia's sphere of influence, and Nicholas would preserve that constant to the day he died in 1981.

The Prussian Empire now had horrific financial issues, and it offered it's colonies as collateral. Most of Prussian India was sold off to Spain and England, who had saved money as the war raged. Much of German Australia met it's demise when Independent Australia purchased it, working with Japan. All over Africa, countries that had stayed out of the German War build up their influence, especially Portugal with it's acquisition of Togoland and Nigeria. France completed that transaction by offering it's own Nigerian territories, as it too had financial issues. Another notable region was Prussian Galicia, which fell into Spanish and Portuguese hands apart from a tiny strip of coastline.

One notable rebellion occurred in Cyrenaica. After some shrewd negotiations, the Arab Republic gained control of the area by working with the Italians. Further financial successes by the Arabs greatly expanded the Egyptian provinces. Europe's hegemony was slowly collapsing.

With the Civil War's end, most resistance movements were immediately crushed. However, the sentiments continued to grow, and several movements would enjoy success within a decade.
 
Can you create a zoomed-in map of Europe for that? The borders are so small there it's hard to see who controls what in some areas.
 
EuropeCloseUp1975-79.png


Choxorn demands, I deliver!
 
Much better. :goodjob:
 
I found a couple of maps I thought I'd share with you.
Spoiler :
image002.jpg

This is a map of the reach of governments, based on three kinds of data:
· the resources they have available, based on per capita GDP
· issues that challenge government authority, such as corruption, crime, and insurgency
· government intentions: the degree of control the government is inclined to exercise

The data combine to create an index score ranging from 100 (much of Western Europe) downwards, bottoming out at D.R. Congo (6) and Somalia (1).
Note that “adequate” signifies the degree of governance, not the competence or virtue of the government with that rating.

What it means for the future
The index suggests government’s ability to get things done:
· At the lowest end, governments are challenged to exercise basic control over their territories, making a country an effective “hole” in the world’s governance structures. This primes them to host unwanted phenomena, from terrorist groups and pirates to diseases eradicated elsewhere. They are failed states, or in danger of becoming so.
· In the “frayed” and “strained” categories, states’ strength is higher, but capacities can still be weak. These states might, for instance, find it difficult to enforce intellectual property laws, or protect the environment.

Spoiler :
image004.jpg

Dyschronicity is a measurement of how much two places are out of sync in time.

To draw a map of dyschronicity, one must pick:
· the yardstick country
· the topic of comparison

In this case, the yardstick is Sweden, and the topic of comparison is broad: societal values and lifeways.

The topic is based on the fact that there has been a path of development that most of the wealthy countries have passed through, characterized by these interrelated phenomena:
· increasing freedom
· rising personal autonomy, if not individualism
· respect for human rights
· diminishing rigidity in approach to traditions

Potential problems with the idea must be acknowledged:
· This is an essentially Western model that may break down as modernization takes more forms.
· Countries are quite diverse, and a single country is likely to be in multiple stages at once.
· All relevant issues do not move in lockstep: post-modern Americans are still rather more religious than post-modern Europeans, for instance.

This map format requires other oversimplifications. Chief among them is that countries are assigned in a uniform color. Swedish-American dyschronicity actually varies from about 10 years to about 100, depending on the locale. The Swedish-Turkish gap might run from 50 years if comparing Sweden to some Istanbul neighborhoods to 500 if the comparison is certain mountain villages.

This measure also in effect presupposes directionality: if one believes that Alabama or Saudi Arabia are more likely evolutionary endpoints than Stockholm, a different map would result.
The same concept can apply to other topics: a map of technology dyschronicity would be informative, for instance.
 
What a load of bullcrap, no offense.

Putting countries like Latvia or Poland in the same category as Algeria or Kazakhstan is just... :lol:

The second map is a nice manifestation of Scandinavian superiority complex :D
 
What a load of bullcrap, no offense.

Putting countries like Latvia or Poland in the same category as Algeria or Kazakhstan is just... :lol:

The second map is a nice manifestation of Scandinavian superiority complex :D


Scandinavia is superior to the rest of the world in many ways!
 
Maybe, but to think they're the highest point in evolution of human society is a bit too much.

They top most of the lists of countries that can be found on Wikipedia, where there is a clear better end of the list to be on. Where they aren't top, they are almost always close.
 
What a load of bullcrap, no offense.

Putting countries like Latvia or Poland in the same category as Algeria or Kazakhstan is just... :lol:

The second map is a nice manifestation of Scandinavian superiority complex :D

Research before allegation plz.
 
That's not a complex, Scandinavia is awesome. Except Sweden, they suck.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom