Where it took 300 years to get 200 miles inland? My point stands

.
As does mine about Brazil's interior being much harder to conquer and much less promising in the short-term than that of Mexico.
Labeled map using das' comments as a guide.
The Republic of New Albion is in OTL California. The rest are right, but Qing China should probably be called the Qing Empire instead, as it isn't very Chinese. Xin Ming Dynasty might or might not be called Xin Ming China, or simply China; it is very nationalistic, more nationalistic than dynastic. Also, you probably could've guessed the Incan Empire.
That map does need some touching up on in the borders.
So you might think, but I've given them a lot of thought here; often what might seem like a mistake is in fact a real and important point reflecting on the wild history of this world. What would your grievances be, exactly?
Now, tell us about these fun-sounding religious wars. It looks like Catholic schism in France.
That much is true; France is the only country left that still follows the Avignon Catholic Church (which had by now diverged from the Roman one in doctrine and theology as well as in politics). During the 14th century a more violent and long-term version of the OTL schism had occured, and a series of fierce religious wars ensued (these were fought all over the greater part of Europe; that was when the French had conquered or reconquered most of their present Iberian holdings, but their campaigns in Lorraine and Italy were less resultative); by the 16th century even Hungary had abandoned the ACC (with the Angevin downfall there after a serious feudal war), but France remained stalwart, increasingly narrowminded, isolationist and hardline. 16th and 17th centuries were characterised by a feudal-clerical oligarchy presiding over the king and the Avignon Pope (both mere figureheads by tradition), with the clerical elements increasingly important; but it was the 18th century that went down in French history as the Age of the Cardinals, as three particularily strong cardinals followed in nearly-uninterrupted succession, reducing their internal enemies to corpses or instruments of their will.
The most prominent - and scary - of these cardinals was Cardinal l'Azyr, who consolidated clerical power, rebuilt the French navy and introduced various pragmatic measures to restore French military potence; this included Peter the Great-style widespread state-owned military manufactories. Then he started the Fifty Years War; France made very limited long-term territorial gains, but wrecked two of its main enemies badly (Flandres and Britain were occupied and thoroughly devastated; ethnic and religious minorities were used as enforcers, traditional institutions were destroyed, fields were salted, cities razed and industries shipped back to France) and fought the third one to a standstill. Peace only came after his death, and though French diplomatic isolation was worsened further and many past enemities were worsened considerably, no new anti-French coalitions have been formed yet; the devastating war on the Flemish-Lorrainean front has proved that any attempts to finish off France would cost way too much in all regards, without a real guarantee of victory.
Since then France had grown rotten and uncompetitive, devolving to a theocratic oligarchy again. It has managed to strike some pragmatic deals with Denmark and Tver though, fighting the Holy Roman Empire to a draw in an 1840s war. Perhaps it can modernise and reform before its internal weakness is exploited by its old enemies. Perhaps not.
A fastforward from the Ionian Revolt alt-hist I did a while back.
Thought so. An interesting timeline that was.
Because Switzerland so far has been rather unafected culturally by the PoD and thus the witch hunts are likely to begin now, just as they did in OTL.
Its just a bit out of the blue and irrelevant to the main "plot". Also, are you sure there were absolutely no witch hunts in Swiss territory previously?
If its an ally, then we shall have a "union"
Nah, its an ancient and extremelly annoying enemy.
To all those giving Swiss advance - you do realise that he doesn't care about winning nearly as much as he cares about annoying people, right?
Interesting changes to the timeline. About the Novgorodian-Lithuanian developments; I wonder how will this affect the Russian Orthodox Church as a whole? Right now the Metropolitian is in Moscow, but he just got there from Vladimir, to where his predecessor moved in 1399; so things are still very mobile, and while northeastern Russia is increasingly troubled (civil wars, feudal strife, Tver vs. Moscow struggle for local hegemony, reintensifying Mongol raids, plus Moscow got sacked not too long ago), the west is suddenly looking extremelly promising, with a powerful new Russian (Lithuanian, but Photius is a Greek and the Rurikids are still distantly Varangian, so the point is moot) prince on the rise, building Orthodox churches and beating up the "Latin dog-knights" (widespread chronicle name for the Teutonic Order). Makes a Metropolitian think about moving to Vilnius or coming back to Kiev, doesn't it (but not that vulgar Novgorod with its unduly democratic ideas about ecclesiarchy)?
1.) The Kingdom of Cyprus invades Mamluk Egypt.
Wasn't Cyprus generally on the defensive by then? I somewhat doubt if it has the manpower to defeat the Mamlukes and make such significant gains in Egypt.
Also, why would the Mamlukes send what appears to be their main forces against the Ottomans when the Cypriots are apparently besieging Alexandria? It just makes little strategic sense.