Ask A Former Army Interrogator

What does a civilian (non-military) interrogator do? :confused:

Well they either become instructors for future military interrogators or they go to work for private investigation firms such as the Reid Corporation. I will be the former.


Breaking them mentally is better, eh? I've always thought torture enhanced interrogation techniques was more about the sadism of the torturers enhanced interrogators than getting any 'real' benefits. Glad to see you don't start using weird names, I wish officials from every country used real words instead of euphemisms.

I wouldn't say we break them mentally, although it does happen sometimes. It's more like mental manipulation. We make them question their entire belief system and we put doubts about their cause in their head. This puts them in a confused mental state which makes them less able to resist questioning.

What got you interested in being an interrogator?

I wanted to be a part of the intelligence community, but I didn't want a job that had me sit in an office all day. A HUMINT Collector was the only intelligence job that offered a real chance to do all the stuff an infantryman does plus collect valuable intelligence. In short, it was an exciting and challenging job, so I jumped at the chance to take it.
 
I wanted to be a part of the intelligence community, but I didn't want a job that had me sit in an office all day. A HUMINT Collector was the only intelligence job that offered a real chance to do all the stuff an infantryman does plus collect valuable intelligence. In short, it was an exciting and challenging job, so I jumped at the chance to take it.

Hehe... this infantryman would like to gently suggest that while you get the chance to play infantry every now and again, 'all the stuff and infantryman does' is pretty wide of the mark
 
Well they either become instructors for future military interrogators or they go to work for private investigation firms such as the Reid Corporation. I will be the former.
Are you allowed to de-classify some information as examples for your trainees? Are the trainees themselves under an agreemnt like yours?
Commodore said:
I wouldn't say we break them mentally, although it does happen sometimes. It's more like mental manipulation. We make them question their entire belief system and we put doubts about their cause in their head. This puts them in a confused mental state which makes them less able to resist questioning.
Hmm. Remind me not to allow you to play Mafia games then. Or any other sort of RPGs.
 
Plus, I never personally applied the methods, that was a job better suited to my Iraqi counterparts. I just extracted the information once they were done doing whatever it is they would do.

If they had not done what you apparently turned a blind eye to, would you have ever got the information out?
 
Do you play good cop bad cop? :lol:

Yes, but we call it something different. The funny thing is I can tell you we use it, but I can't tell you what we call it because that's classified. You'd be surprised how effective it is too. Although if the subject has had training in interrogation resistance, they will probably see right through it.

Are you allowed to de-classify some information as examples for your trainees? Are the trainees themselves under an agreemnt like yours?

No I cannot declassify anything. The Army has an entirely separate authority that handles declassification of documents and materials.

Yes the trainees sign the non-disclosure agreement before they even start the training.

Hehe... this infantryman would like to gently suggest that while you get the chance to play infantry every now and again, 'all the stuff and infantryman does' is pretty wide of the mark

Well some of my fellow HUMINT Collectors would let their tactical skills lapse, but I trained with the infantry guys whenever I had some downtime from my HUMINT duties. This is because I wanted to make sure that when I went out with them that I wouldn't be a liability. I didn't want the infantrymen to think they had to protect me. I also wanted them to know that if it came to it, I was perfectly capable of covering their backsides just as well as they could cover mine. My philosophy was that I am a soldier first, and an interrogator second. Plus, while my primary MOS was Human Intelligence Collector, I also had a secondary MOS of Cavalry Scout. I could operate just about every weapon system, I was an expert at calling for both artillery and air fire support. I could set up an OP, and dig a fighting position. Hell, I even learned all the operator level maintenance tasks for the Stryker (we were a Stryker Brigade, so that was our primary vehicle).

So while I will agree that most non-combat MOS's in the military do like to play infantry, I actually took honing my tactical skills very seriously.
 
If they had not done what you apparently turned a blind eye to, would you have ever got the information out?

Yes, but it would have taken a lot longer to get it. Normally I wouldn't have a problem taking my time extracting information, but this was time-sensitive information so I didn't have the time to run my normal methods. I needed to get it as fast as possible. I'll admit that turning a blind eye to it was illegal and if I got caught I would be in jail right now, but I don't regret it.
 
While you talk a good talk, and I do believe you. Is there anything you can use to prove you really were a FAI?
 
While you talk a good talk, and I do believe you. Is there anything you can use to prove you really were a FAI?

I guess I could post a redacted copy of my DD-214. Would that be proof enough?
 
I have no idea what a redacted DD-214 is, but yeah, why not :)
 
I have no idea what a redacted DD-214 is, but yeah, why not :)

A DD-214 is the document one receives when they are discharged from the military in the United States.

DOCUMENT REMOVED FOR SECURITY REASONS.
 
What do you do if a prisoner refuses to talk whatsoever?

We will either transfer him/her to a higher level detention facility (Conventional warfare/Counter-insurgency operations) or turn him over to host nation authorities (Counter-insurgency operations).
 
We will either transfer him/her to a higher level detention facility (Conventional warfare/Counter-insurgency operations) or turn him over to host nation authorities (Counter-insurgency operations).

Would you ever turn him over to "host nation authorities" because they have alternative interrogation tactics that United States Military ethical codes forbid?

(even something as simple as "roughing them up" if it would help, not talking about torture here)
 
Would you ever turn him over to "host nation authorities" because they have alternative interrogation tactics that United States Military ethical codes forbid?

That's a sticky situation because we are not supposed to turn a detainee over to a nation that is known to torture prisoners. However, officially the Iraqi government denounced torture so it was technically okay to turn detainees over to them.

EDIT: If the "roughing them up" turns out to be in violation of the Law of Land Warfare, then we technically aren't supposed to turn them over. But of course there are loopholes, just like any other law or regulation.
 
That's a sticky situation because we are not supposed to turn a detainee over to a nation that is known to torture prisoners. However, officially the Iraqi government denounced torture so it was technically okay to turn detainees over to them.

Aha, gotcha.

What would those higher level facilities do, do you know?
 
Aha, gotcha.

What would those higher level facilities do, do you know?

Same thing I would do, only better. This is because the higher facilities have more experienced interrogators and greater resources at their disposal to provide incentives to those who cooperate. The interrogators there are also trained to get those subjects trained to resist interrogations to talk. I am not aware of how they do this.
 
Does the interrogators being more experienced help? Could they be more, um… emotionally scarred from their job?
 
Does the interrogators being more experienced help? Could they be more, um… emotionally scarred from their job?

Yes it helps. An interrogator that has been doing it for 10 or 20 years can extract information from just about anyone. Interrogators like that get the big assignments like interrogating Saddam or Osama if he had been captured.

As for emotional scarring, I guess it's possible. I find myself unable to believe anything anyone tells me unless I can verify what they say. I also sometimes start questioning people as if I am interrogating them during normal conversations. In my opinion, the greatest effect the job has on someone is that it becomes extremely difficult to "turn it off".
 
Do your kids ever get away with anything? Have you interrogation skills allowed you to stand a chance in an argument with your wife?
 
Back
Top Bottom