Ask a Russian

Status
Not open for further replies.
Idk if Russians would eat this.

Flat white coffee with cheese scone.

IMG_20211003_104829.jpg

Raspberry iced bun with raspberry jam.

IMG_20211002_103013.jpg

Chicken Chorizo pie, bread, salad

IMG_20211001_174912.jpg

Open steak sandwich. Mushrooms and blue cheese.

IMG_20210929_175439.jpg

Home made chicken kebab.

IMG_20210928_175307.jpg

Mango and apricot IPA 6.5%

IMG_20210929_173610.jpg

Bowl of salad with hummus and smoked cheese.

IMG_20210928_174155.jpg
 
Idk if Russians would eat this.
Slavs also have different tastes and none of this looks too strange. I don't know what a "cheese scone" is, but the rest of it looks like typical "western food" to me, which is perfectly edible :) I'd almost bet all other Slavic Slavs would say the same.

EDIT: The salad you have added is perfectly slav if you replace hummus with mayo or oil.
 
Slavs also have different tastes and none of this looks too strange. I don't know what a "cheese scone" is, but the rest of it looks like typical "western food" to me, which is perfectly edible :) I'd almost bet all other Slavic Slavs would say the same.

EDIT: The salad you have added is perfectly slav if you replace hummus with mayo or oil.

It had mayo in the salad.

I find you're generally safe with sweet food. Chocolate is chocolate it's hard to screw that up (Americans do). Blini is close enough to crepes and booze is booze close enough is good enough.

Russian food looks a bit heavy for me. Lots of root vegetables and heavy on the mayo.

Edible better than what I had growing up. Boiled cabbage, mince stew and mashed potatoes thank you English legacy.
 
Sounds like something I might want to try cooking, thanks :thumbsup:
 
About the language:


Some things I wasn't aware about, e.g. Alaskan dialect.
And yes, while Cyrillic alphabet may look intimidating, it shouldn't take more than a few days to learn.
Reading should be easy too, but grammar is totally different story.
 
How much, if at all, will such releases threaten Putin?

Russia Probes Videos Of Prisoner Torture
BY GEORGI KANTCHEV

MOSCOW—Russian law enforcement opened criminal investigations into reports of widespread prisoner abuse and several officials in the penitentiary system were fired in cases that human-rights advocates say point to systematic torture in prisons across the country.

The probes come after prison activist group Gulagu.net posted footage it says depicts abuse, humiliation and beatings in prison facilities, part of a trove of more than 1,000 videos that have been leaked. The Wall Street Journal couldn’t independently confirm the veracity of the videos. While human-rights observers have often reported instances of torture and abuse in Russian prisons, some of which have led to public trials, the new leak appears to be one of the largest yet, analysts said.

The videos “prove that grave and especially violent crimes were regularly committed against prisoners, which were carefully concealed,” Vladimir Osechkin, who runs Gulagu.net, a human-rights project focused on the Russian prison system, wrote on Facebook on Wednesday. Mr. Osechkin didn’t respond to a request to comment. Russia’s prison service said that it fired four officers, including the head of a prison hospital in the southwestern city of Saratov, following the torture reports. The Kremlin said that if the videos were confirmed, it would lead to a serious probe.

The Investigative Committee, the nation’s main investigations agency, said it had opened seven criminal probes, including into sexual assault and abuse of power in Saratov’s prison system. The committee said it was investigating crimes against four convicts in Saratov between January 2020 and May 2021.

One of the videos published this week appears to show a man, tied to a bed, being abused with a long red stick as he screams in pain. Another video shows a man tied up on the ground as uniformed officers urinate on his face. In another video, a man appears to be lying facedown with his hands tied behind him, as a guard pushes his boot into his shoulders and asks him, “Who are you in life?” The prisoner replies, “Nobody, a tramp.”

Human-rights observers said that the videos reflect the horrific reality in Russia’s prison system and are consistent with previous leaks and torture cases. Gulagu.net said that the footage is part of a video archive that a source, who had worked for five years in Russia’s penitentiary system, managed to smuggle out of Russia. The source is currently outside the country and is seeking political asylum in Europe, the organization said.

“These videos are immensely horrendous and authorities need to investigate these shocking allegations promptly and effectively,” said Tanya Lokshina, Moscow-based associate director at Human Rights Watch’s Europe and Central Asia division. She said her organization wasn’t in a position to verify the videos but they are “clearly reminiscent of previous documented cases of torture.”

“It is crystal clear that this isn’t just about some random incidents, the problem of torture in Russian prisons is very acute,” she said. She added that besides investigating the prison officials, the victims, some of whom were exposed in the videos, have to urgently be shielded from further abuse, including by fellow inmates. The depictions in the leaked videos add to a growing body of evidence of systematic abuse in Russia carried out by prison staff or other inmates, human-rights watchers say.

Analysts said that the videos could add pressure on President Vladimir Putin’s government, which is already facing growing public discontent amid stagnating living standards and limited personal freedoms.
 
How much, if at all, will such releases threaten Putin?
Most people won't associate it with Putin, it's not like this got worse after he came to power.
Things which may affect his popularity, are the laws and regulations enacted by the government, and other things such as improving or worsening of living standards.

These notable cases which get public attention and media coverage, usually investigated by the IC (kind of FBI in Russia). Which means it won't be swept under the carpet, connections won't help and high-profile figures aren't immune either.

There was a case about a decade ago with a gang terrorizing people in Rostov region. At some point, they got in conflict with local businessman and murdered him with all his family and kids. Only after this appeared in federal newspapers, Moscow woke up and heads started rolling.
 
I would be interesting in how the Nobel Peace Prize award to Dmitry Muratov is being covered over there.
If Peskov has already made a statement congratulating the laureate, sure, why not? It is part of the act that the Russian government pretends Russia is a free and open society, as much a functioning democracy as any other. They will likely spin the fact that this reporter still being alive (even if six of his reporters so far no longer are), at large, and working, into proof positive of this.

When people get hauled in front of Russian courts, with their 99% conviction rate, it's technically never for any kind of political activity bothering the Russian authorities, but always for alleged corruption, pedophilia etc.
 
General Dynamics European Land Systems to Supply Amphibious Bridge and Ferry System to Latvia
General Dynamics European Land Systems (GDELS) announced today it has agreed to provide the M3 Amphibious Bridge and Ferry System to Latvia. Latvia will be the newest NATO customer to receive the system.

Question, to help invade which country?
 
General Dynamics European Land Systems to Supply Amphibious Bridge and Ferry System to Latvia
General Dynamics European Land Systems (GDELS) announced today it has agreed to provide the M3 Amphibious Bridge and Ferry System to Latvia. Latvia will be the newest NATO customer to receive the system.

Question, to help invade which country?

Better invade them first.
 
it is like folklore that there is a distinct difference between the sides of that former great divide . In the West the bridges are rated for 60 tons and plus . Average weight of NATO top tier tanks ... ln the East no bridge can handle more than 40 , them those low slung lightweight Russian tanks . Accordingly if Russian spearheads on their way to the Manche managed to capture a bridge intact somewhere in Germany , they would cherish it and just drive on . If not they are carrying spare bridges with them . On the contrary if it was the West doing the invading business ghey would have to bring and use their own and Eastern Europe is supposedly wet . Accordingly this is not a proof of "offensive" intent . Ignoring the thing that things are becoming offensive all around ... and the Poles have been feverishly working on it , reinforcing their bridges and road network since the day the Wall fell . Or something .
 
it is like folklore that there is a distinct difference between the sides of that former great divide . In the West the bridges are rated for 60 tons and plus . Average weight of NATO top tier tanks ... ln the East no bridge can handle more than 40 , them those low slung lightweight Russian tanks . Accordingly if Russian spearheads on their way to the Manche managed to capture a bridge intact somewhere in Germany , they would cherish it and just drive on . If not they are carrying spare bridges with them . On the contrary if it was the West doing the invading business ghey would have to bring and use their own and Eastern Europe is supposedly wet . Accordingly this is not a proof of "offensive" intent . Ignoring the thing that things are becoming offensive all around ... and the Poles have been feverishly working on it , reinforcing their bridges and road network since the day the Wall fell . Or something .

Western tanks were designed for defensive war. Hence thick turret storm and gun depression for hull down use.

Most Russian stuff now under armored and under gunned except the armata.
 
every single Russian thing was once designed for a desperate fling against a technologically superior enemy. And heavy armour and big guns make super offensive tanks if they do not have to travel too much. Or have instead adequate support in everyway. It doesn't look like the M-1s were ever defensive against the lraqis.
 
it is like folklore that there is a distinct difference between the sides of that former great divide . In the West the bridges are rated for 60 tons and plus . Average weight of NATO top tier tanks ... ln the East no bridge can handle more than 40 , them those low slung lightweight Russian tanks . Accordingly if Russian spearheads on their way to the Manche managed to capture a bridge intact somewhere in Germany , they would cherish it and just drive on . If not they are carrying spare bridges with them . On the contrary if it was the West doing the invading business ghey would have to bring and use their own and Eastern Europe is supposedly wet . Accordingly this is not a proof of "offensive" intent . Ignoring the thing that things are becoming offensive all around ... and the Poles have been feverishly working on it , reinforcing their bridges and road network since the day the Wall fell . Or something .
Well, this proves that life is more complicated than HoI IV ;)

Western tanks were designed for defensive war. Hence thick turret storm and gun depression for hull down use.

Most Russian stuff now under armored and under gunned except the armata.
Yes yes yes, Russian tanks are offensive, Western tanks are defensive. Russian artillery is offensive, Western artillery is defensive. Russian guns shoot bullets, Western guns shoot little shields.
 
every single Russian thing was once designed for a desperate fling against a technologically superior enemy. And heavy armour and big guns make super offensive tanks if they do not have to travel too much. Or have instead adequate support in everyway. It doesn't look like the M-1s were ever defensive against the lraqis.

For a while there the Soviets were very close to US where it matters. Mid 50's to early 70's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom