Zack
99% hot gas
Why vote for glossy and not me? Think you'll get better support this way?
vote: Glossy.
Concocted the terrible lynch of Cass, along with everything else I stated in post 2177. Teammates with Zack, KM, Murska, and Cuth - just look at the voting patterns. Lynch right down the line and we'll have this still. KM for defending Zack/finishing off Cass, Cuth for agreeing with glossy on anything and everything, and Murska for the connections with glossy. And if you still don't believe me on Zack:
Underlining mine. I went from scum fodder to "save" someone to what amounts to being a confirmed townie in one post.
Well, so much for my read on Kennigit. Just as wrong as every other read I've had this game...
The lylo message in the update makes me think there's 4 mafia, not 5- If it was 5 it would be impossible to win if we mislynch, if it's 4 it's only very, very difficult.
Why vote for glossy and not me? Think you'll get better support this way?
Is this a joke?Well at least that removes my niggling doubt. Zack sounds pretty invested in keeping Glossy safe.
It's a legitimate question. Yesterday you were both screaming for my lynch, what changed your tune? Seems like a calculated move to for more support, which I suppose is not scummy in itself.
And just so we're clear, I'm fine with a glossy lynch. I was simply curious about the sudden switch from you and bl.I've been trying for two days and it keeps not happening. In light of Cass' flip, this clarifies a lot of what I was thinking but not entirely sure of. With things down to the wire, I'm willing to go with the momentum and get a lynch on suspect #2. Although a competing wagon on you would be lovely.
Is this a joke?
I suggest we lynch someone from one of {glossysushi, Zack, KingMorgan, edse} today. I think that gives us a pretty good chance of finding scum. A few people have already voted for glossy, so I will vote: edse as an alternate wagon.
I have to admit that Lassie's latest posts are changing my mind. Lassie's wrong about me, and my gut tells me wrong about others, but he's so sure of himself and his reads. It's a bolder strategy than a mafioso would need to take at this stage in the game-- he's risking a lot on his credibility.
I'm still on board with Vote:Lassie.
I'll continue to Vote:Lassie. I think we'll have a lot of information based on how he flips either way. Xym and Cuth are among those who'd seem scummy to me given a scum flip for Lassie.
landlubber: his defense of me pinged me when others scoffed at my large post. Why defend me the way he has? Trying to grab fake townie points if/when I'm lynched? Also the reasoning for tacking onto the Lassie vote yesterday seemed very forced, like, "I'm bandwagoning here, but I better say something townie that doesn't look like I'm bandwagoning."
edse: Fake activity with the Zack post/accusation on D1 and really nothing more. Flinched on the Cuth accusation (post804), or could be read as forced distancing between the two.
I'm seeing a glossy/Zack/choxorn/murska connection right now, I'm getting scum vibes from landlubber, and the cass post that's somehow incriminated him seems to be glossy grasping at straws. I've made the "look at x player tomorrow" post as town. Hell, we all have - if this guy flips, then look this way. If not, look at these guys. It's how you play the game. So I find it highly suspicious and slightly hilarious when two of the more active posters grab onto something so trivial and run with it. Oh and why Murska?
glossy/Zack/Murska/choxorn/ possibly landlubber. Start with the four, then we'll sort it out from there.