Aspiring Rapper's MAFIA- Game Thread

That's the only reason I doubted he was part of the scum team, but his 'understanding' of vote mechanics is an easy 'confusion' to fake if scum. He said that he'd considered all the possibilities, and could see the two wagons ATM as v/v or w/w, yet he does not move his vote or ask more questions to remain engaged. How on earth do you keep voting on a wagon you think that will probably kill a villager, when it's lylo?
 
If Visor is off the table, then I could lynch Al Sips / Arakhor / Mat93 / LandLubber

Early KM reads.

You know what ticks alot of boxes?

A Zack/Visor/Takahsis/Landluber scum team.

It shouldn't make sense but some how after 5 pints it really begs the question..... why not? a scum team blitz on a short day.

Later...

Well based on this i'm happy to lynch, Visorslash/Mat93/Cuthilius

Shortly afterwards.

al sipsclar - scum should be lynched
autolycus - Lurker scum - should be lynched
backwards logic Lurker scum - should be lynched
bsmith Lurker scum - should be lynched
cass_ - surprised not NK'd - must be scum
choxorn - townish lean
cuthilius - maybe townish lean
edse - lynch just to be safe
glossysushi - surprised not NK'd - must be scum
Kennigit vol. 2 - trying harder after being called out.
landlubber - lynch just to be safe / scum
legato endless - unknown
lohrenswald - Lurker Scum? lynch just to be safe / scum
murska - unknown
xym - town
zack - looks town but lynch to be safe


I'm somewhat undecided who to vote, so many good candidates, cleaning out the lurkers seems a very good course of action, but there are so many of them!

A list. By the way, this suspicions list is pretty hilarious.
 
also, wait a second

you just said you've taken every post since i read glossy town and i didn't change my mind

oh dear that's really damning

you're ignoring EVERYTHING before and that's really weak and terrible
 
Um... BL, when you reread posts and do ISOs... A note for the future when you rand scum again: probably don't only choose the posts that fit your narrative, mk? You've only taken posts from after my D3 in which I was silent. Where are the D1 and D2 posts?
 
al sipsclar - scum should be lynched
autolycus - Lurker scum - should be lynched

backwards logic Lurker scum - should be lynched
bsmith Lurker scum - should be lynched
cass_ - surprised not NK'd - must be scum

choxorn - townish lean
cuthilius - maybe townish lean
edse - lynch just to be safe
glossysushi - surprised not NK'd - must be scum
Kennigit vol. 2 - trying harder after being called out.
landlubber - lynch just to be safe / scum
legato endless - unknown
lohrenswald - Lurker Scum? lynch just to be safe / scum
murska - unknown
xym - town
zack - looks town but lynch to be safe??????????????


I'm somewhat undecided who to vote, so many good candidates, cleaning out the lurkers seems a very good course of action, but there are so many of them!

:sad:
 
also, wait a second

you just said you've taken every post since i read glossy town and i didn't change my mind

oh dear that's really damning

you're ignoring EVERYTHING before and that's really weak and terrible

I'm not ignoring it. It's irrelevant for the point I'm making.

Yes, you and glossy went at it a bit, but it wouldn't be the first time scums have acted out in the thread to accuse each other and distance themselves. It's a common scum move to put on a show in thread and 'clear' each other so that the town read looks genuine. My point is your read on both has not changed since and that it's stayed static despite the town lynches that followed.
 
I'm ignoring it. It's irrelevant for the point I'm making.

Yes, you and glossy went at it a bit, but it wouldn't be the first time scums have acted out in the thread to accuse each other and distance themselves. It's a common scum move to put on a show in thread and 'clear' each other so that the town read looks genuine. My point is your read on both has not changed since and that it's stayed static despite the town lynches that followed.

THEN YOUR POINT IS COMPLETELY INVALID

and i've totally seen all your darn townreads changing, I'm sure
 
Um... BL, when you reread posts and do ISOs... A note for the future when you rand scum again: probably don't only choose the posts that fit your narrative, mk? You've only taken posts from after my D3 in which I was silent. Where are the D1 and D2 posts?

I haven't even done you yet. Can't search back that far, so I have to do it the old fashioned way.
 
Hm. Xym didn't push for any of the potential scum team either, but then Xym didn't do much at all.

I'm actually not sure KM is scum.
 
Convince me that you actually believe I'm scum. I don't sense any of that conviction. You seem to be trying here, that's for sure, but that's only after we asked you for proof.
 
I'm not ignoring it. It's irrelevant for the point I'm making.

Yes, you and glossy went at it a bit, but it wouldn't be the first time scums have acted out in the thread to accuse each other and distance themselves. It's a common scum move to put on a show in thread and 'clear' each other so that the town read looks genuine. My point is your read on both has not changed since and that it's stayed static despite the town lynches that followed.
exactly what I've been talking about. Lying and misrepresenting to fit a constructed narrative.

You still have not answered why glossy and not me.
 
Back
Top Bottom