CivCube
Spicy.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2003
- Messages
- 5,824
But the problem is that reading such critiques doesn't explain why you enjoyed it, it explains how someone else thinks you might have enjoyed it.
That's why you decide for yourself...at least, I do. I can enjoy films based on my own impressions. I also like to develop my tastes and see what I'm missing. Reasoned arguments from people who have more experience and know-how of how film works can provide that needed context. Compared to the original Star Wars movies, I actually kinda liked Phantom Menace. I thought the following two sucked, but the first one still "felt like the originals" for whatever reason. And honestly, I couldn't for the life of me figure out what that was. Turns out it was mostly me filling the blanks; thanks to a recent video review, I now know what didn't click for me. And now I know why I enjoy the originals all the more, and why they are legitimately well made. I can actually enjoy the films more now than when I first saw them.
It's also why I enjoyed Avatar that much more, a film that I initially wrote off as "we must protect the crystals" plot tropes. Then I did some research on James Cameron and how he approaches his movie-making, followed by watching Terminator 2 to see what I thought. I liked his huckster attitude to 3D and pulpy earnestness, so I finally saw the blue furries in theatres. And I was blown away.
Basically, people who are obsessed with interpreting art are destroying it. It certainly applies to some of the more snobbish critics in this country.



