Avatar

Yeah, the movie is about impressive graphics and not substance. Critics will usually trash a movie that lacks substance, so no surprise there. (I am saying it lacks substance based on what I have heard - including what your brother says, but hey, maybe that's all wrong, I won't know until I see it)

How do you explain it being very well recieved by critics? Anomaly?

In my opinion Star Wars lacked substance, but it was still good fun and a technical marvel. Seems that was enough to make it famous.
 
Well, since there hasnt been a thread on this yet, I thought I would make one. We generally do make threads about big movies coming out and this one could be huge.

Are you planning on seeing it? In regular or 3D?

Opinions on how the movie looks in the trailers?

As the thread progresses and people do see the movie I simply ask that any spoiler information be:
Spoiler :
spoilered as appropriate


Its been reported that its probably the most expensive movie ever made, clocking in at about 300 million dollars. Did they get their moneys worth?

We will absolutely see it, but I am not going to fight opening day crowds for it. Maybe go on Monday night. My family also wants to see it in 3D, but I have never really enjoyed 3D, and am not sure this new tech Cameron has come up with will improve the experience for me. If anyone has information on this I would appreciate it.

I've been told its a butchering of Old Man's War, mixed with some Fern Gully/Furry madness.

EDIT:

This film has a definite green and antiwar message. Something someone like you isn't going to appreciate. :rolleyes:

And if you do the joke will be on you.

From what I understand, its more of a pro-collective-security, anti-colonialism message than anything else.

What is pro-Green about the movie?
 
How do you explain it being very well recieved by critics? Anomaly?

In my opinion Star Wars lacked substance, but it was still good fun and a technical marvel. Seems that was enough to make it famous.

WTH, you're right, rotten tomatoes has it at 83%

I will reserve any further comments until I see this thing in IMAX 3D
 
I've been wanting to see this movie since about September. I loves me a good SciFi/Fantasy flick, especially one with a historical parallel (I hope it's not too cheesy :rolleyes:)

@Bast and Patroklos: Last time I checked, this thread is about the movie Avatar, directed by James Cameron, not the existence (or nonexistence) of AGW. Can we please keep this thread on-topic? Because wading through 2 pages of you two arguing back and forth is very tedious.
 
Ive only seen the previews on tv and online but all the CG looks really fake to me, especially the blue people things. I'll probably still go see it just because I have a friend whos been all gay over it for months, but I cant stand CG, no matter how good it looks.
 
Bast vs Pat .., MIRROR MATCH!

More on topic: Is there any reason to hope for the plot when Cameron has doled more for a digital rack than Halle Berry received for that scene in Swordfish?
 
(I hope it's not too cheesy :rolleyes:)

Fear not, it isn't. It does have some that kind of parts, but not more than films on average. People who are less allergic to it won't even notice anything.

CavLancer: I noticed that what I've written before might give pretty wrong idea. The film is not at all preachy. It is probably intended to have a message, but primarily it's just a story.

And by saying that film wasn't bad I really meant that it is pretty good. It's entertainment, so it doesn't matter if the story is told million times, or it doesn't have particularly original plot. And I for one am very glad that it didn't contain lots of surprising twists, because they have become pretty mandatory, and boring too (unless they are effortless and genuine).

It was surprisingly easy to sit through even though it lasted almost three hours. And if the plot doesn't captivate you, you can just watch the scenery.
 
Just saw it today. Visually it was almost mind-blowing but it bothered me a bit that the plot was too much "political and social criticism for dummies".
 
Bast vs Pat .., MIRROR MATCH!

More on topic: Is there any reason to hope for the plot when Cameron has doled more for a digital rack than Halle Berry received for that scene in Swordfish?

It depends on whether you like your women with blue skin and whiskers.
 
No one else plugged in their hair to see this movie??? What was I doing?!

This movie was green. It was also 100% James Cameron. That's why I liked it.
 
So it was quite cliché and predictable, but that didn't make any less good, me thinks. For a cliché to be established, or perpetuated as cliché, it needs to be used. And Avatar did do cliché very very well. In years to come, this movie should be the standard from which the cliché comes, not just another clichéd movie. If you know what I mean.

The 3D effects are really, really good, I must say, perhaps mostly for the reason that they are not overdone. James Cameron has resisted the temptation of making the movie for the sake of playing around with cool 3D technology. It was made so as that the 3D stuff was not the primary focus, but merely complemented the stunning graphics, in a quite spectacular way.
 
saw it today.

totally lives up to the hype.

hands down, flat out, far and AWAY the BEST movie going experience of my LIFE!

I won't say it was my favorite movie, or the best I've ever seen (though certainly up there), but as far as an experience AT the theater... nothing else even comes CLOSE!

if you got it, GO TO THE IMAX!!!

Moderator Action: Threads merged

the effects made me want to weep. they were so freakin gorgeous!!

the creatures in the film are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo SWEEEET!
 
So it was quite cliché and predictable, but that didn't make any less good, me thinks. For a cliché to be established, or perpetuated as cliché, it needs to be used. And Avatar did do cliché very very well. In years to come, this movie should be the standard from which the cliché comes, not just another clichéd movie. If you know what I mean.

The 3D effects are really, really good, I must say, perhaps mostly for the reason that they are not overdone. James Cameron has resisted the temptation of making the movie for the sake of playing around with cool 3D technology. It was made so as that the 3D stuff was not the primary focus, but merely complemented the stunning graphics, in a quite spectacular way.

Just saw it and I totally agree. The story is the usual, you can easily predict what is coming. But when you mix it with the stunning effects, it becomes this whole new amazing thing, something that I think would not easily translate well to smaller screens. If you have the chance, see it in IMAX 3-D, that's where it's meant to be and where it's at its best.
 
What is pro-Green about the movie?
The Na'Vi are shown to have deep connections to the plant and animal life of the planet, holding it to be deeply sacred. It is implied that all of Pandora's fauna are connected, SMAC-style. It's not the central message of the film, but elements of environmentalism are present, certainly.
 
Back
Top Bottom