Terrance888
Discord Reigns
I own a villa in Tuscany. Does that count?
Apparently the government of Occitania is ruled by incompetents and intellectual lightweights.
That or it is so blinded by an animus against the Holy See that it would resort to all measures in attempts to attack us.
To provide our paternal correction to its wayward statements, we would like to re-clarify to the world that the term states is in fact a plural, in reference to all the states of the world. The term italian region is a specific reference to the Brittanic Alliances actions in providing technological support to Naples in the war in which we seek to end their intrusions on sovereignty.
idea of sovereignty entails a states sole prerogative to control what happens within its sovereign territory
Such as prerogative, I would imagine, over the freedom of speech and the establishment of printing presses within its sovereign territory?
We neither confirm nor deny this, and whatever the result maybe is completely inconsequential. Ad hominem attacks by the Pope does not bode well for him.
"Sovereignty of States" in itself as a term is not plural, but a singular referring to all the rights and responsibilities sovereignty entails, but that matters not since your definition hurts you more than the "actual" one.
from the Italian Republic
to the Papal States:
First we wish to inform you for a second time, we are not a kingdom. We are a free republic, one where each man is equal and is allowed to vote for his government. It is true, our Constitution has not been formalized yet to decide how this republic will function, but it remains a republic, a beacon of freedom, and not a kingdom, lands rule by a single ruler.
And as I spoke before. We wish not to war, but to unify, and grant the Italian people freedom. Are you so cruel to control your population against their will? What sort of a spiritual man are you if you deny the rights of men? You can excommunicate me, and the government, and the entire nation, and even all Italians, but how much good will that grant you?
We will promise you this. The Papal States will not be attacked by the republic so long as if your population rebels and joins us anyway, you will not oppose them. Agreed?
But earlier you said it was plural. The Pope made a mistake? Oh my.Indeed the term together is a singular as you say.
The principle of the sovereignty of states and the fundamental right of political self determination
The principle of (legal) equality between states
The principle of non-intervention of one state in the internal affairs of another state
In addition, part 1 assumes further rights.Thus, if a state could not act in the best interests of its own citizens, it could not be thought of as a “sovereign” state
Will you kill all of your population only to remain in power?To: The Italian Republic
From: Papal States
You deal is unnacceptable in that it would deny the papal states its legitimate rights to the use of force to preserve its territorial integrity.
As to your statements regarding the temporal jurisdiction of the Church. The states of the Church are absolutely necessary in ensuring the Church's sovereignty from states, and from any who would bring the Holy See and the Church of God under their control.
This necessity is for the common good of all men, and trumps some ideological "right" (as distinct from natural rights ordained by God) to the creation of a secular italian state. For should the Church come under a secular government, its independent voice to stand for truth and right virtue in the world will become oppressed, and there will be no one to challenge mankinds descent into the dictatorship of relativism and into error. The Church's ability to lead people to salvation will be destroyed and all mankind will suffer in darkness as a result, both in this life and in the next.
We cannot permit the sovereignty of the Church to be subjugated to a secular state
~ Pope Leo XIV
Regardless the rest of Occitanias statements is not worth a reply, namely because they betray mindlessness and lack of understanding of the legitimate cases for war, and because they insult teh Papal States and misconstrue the very idea of sovereignty by placing it onto an ideological construct of contemporaneous times that does not exist. Furthermore by denying the legitimate and ancient rights of the papal states to sovereignty over its lands, from thousands of years ago to the present day, Occitania reveals that it has a deliberate agenda against us, and that as such all reasoned response is ultimately an endeavour in futility against an opponent already confirmed in its bias and in its malice.
But earlier you said it was plural. The Pope made a mistake? Oh my.
:The principle of the sovereignty of states and the fundamental right of political self determination
:The principle of (legal) equality between states
:The principle of non-intervention of one state in the internal affairs of another state
1) It is clear by the rates of desertions that the Papal States is not acting in the best intersest of its people.OOC: The quote, and this whole point is rather irrelevant since the principles it addresses refer to modern theoretical debate on the wesphalian conception of sovereignty that underpins the current political order. In particular your quote is relevant in the idea of "responsibility to protect" which is a modern conception.
This whole point (as compared to the three core principles) is thus irrelvant considering our IC time frame is at the beginnings of the 20th century where these new conceptions had yet to appear.
- territorial integrity
- border inviolability
- supremacy of the state (rather than the Church)
- sovereign is the supreme lawmaking authority within its jurisdiction
Occitania seems to forget that the Papal States is a state. The idea of state supremacy rather than the Church refers to the medieval system of the inferiority of secular authorities to ecclesiastical law and sanction. A system that needs not be described.
You violated *rant*
This entire statement ignores the principles of right causes for war. Naples was deliberately sowing dissent and rebellion in the Papal States violating the third principle of westphalian sovereignty. Furthermore it clearly as such intended to violate it directly at some time in the future. This gives the Papal States legitimate reason for war with the pernicious Neapolitans. It was as an effort to satisfy our requirements for continued peace that we demanded Naples withdraw its support from the nationalist press, this was hardly therefore an intrusion on neapolitan sovereignty but rather a request that Naples refrain from intruding in ours.
PS: I study political theory and international relations academically. So Terrance it is not out of some shack in the woods Im saying what Im saying, but rather I am presenting normative principles in defence of the Papal States position.
-
@ Italy (erez)
Spoiler :Will you kill all of your population only to remain in power?
While I see the reasoning for the existence of a Papal States, I do not see the need of that state to be a dictatorship that would see the death of its entire population before it would allow its people the right of freedom.
We were all made in god's image, and for that all men are equal. While the Pope is our connection to the heavens, here on the Earth every man has the right to be free, as ordained by god when he created us as equals.
If you do not accept the rights of your own population, than we cannot promise you anything. We will not let Italians die under the dictatorship of anyone, not even the holy father.
The Papal States is not a dictatorship, it is an elective absolute ecclesiocratic monarchy. We fail to see how your statements on the equality of man are even relevant, considering their geniune meaning as no one man is superior to another in his inherent dignities and natural rights as ordained by God, and considering that the citizens of the papal states have genuine liberty to live according to what is right. Indeed this is genuine liberty, for no state allows man full freedom for freedom can only be enjoyed when it is restrained lest their be anarchy and disorder. Thus why states have laws
@ Terrance in regards to second statement
Spoiler :If the pope wish not to respond, I would like to finish to say that this verbal sparring is merely that. Changing your definitions is not in the good taste of international discussion, and leaving while pretending to be on the high ground will reveal nothing but your fear. You have nothing to fear for me, for I am but a mere voice among thousands until you singled me out.
If you would not participate and listen to me, that is acceptable. Go to your people, and listen to what they say. Listen to them talk about oppression, ruthlessness, death, hopelessness and other such things.
Go, listen.
And realize that they are talking about you.
Im not changing my definitions, rather I am responding to your repeated attempts to frame what I say as something different from what it actually is (ergo that post I previously mentioned, and your attempts to include modern principles into the original westphalian framework). Regardless the rest of yoru statement was not worthy of comment since it simply repeated tired old attempts to frame my statements into something else, to propose new ideas as my own, and to suggest to the observor fallacious allusions as to my intent. All that was relevant was addressed out of concern for your wellbeing, if you are immune to the medicine of reason then it is best to ignore the madness and address what is necessary for those around you.
To: The Italian Republic
From: Naples
We have made moves toward a democracy as shown with our opening of the press and a promise to Sicily that we would eventually. Our movement has been slowed due to the war and once we have peace time we will gladly move towards a democracy to give the power to the Italian people that rightfully deserve it as we have been advocating over the last year. We have pledged ourselves to supporting the Italian people and pushing for them to have rights, we did this all when everyone was targeting us and trying to shut us up for it. While you cowered in your little corner and waited for the war to start, we did not back down from our stance on Italian freedoms and unification. Naples is the true leaders of Italy and we seek to empower the Italian people and give them the rights they deserve and want! So to all the Italian people, we are still supporting you completely and wish to see you all free and with the rights you deserve, join Naples and let us free every Italian from the oppression they face. Once the Papal States are dealt with we will do all we can to free Venice from Austria and hope we will have the backing of the Italians while doing so.