Cardinal blasts 'Da Vinci Code'

storealex

In service of peace
Joined
Jul 22, 2003
Messages
3,710
Location
Denmark
ROME, Italy (Reuters) -- A top Catholic cardinal has blasted "The Da Vinci Code" as a "gross and absurd" distortion of history and said Catholic bookstores should take the bestseller off their shelves because it is full of "cheap lies."

Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, in an interview with the Milan newspaper Il Giornale, became the highest ranking Italian Churchman to speak out against the book, an international blockbuster that has sold millions of copies.

"(It) aims to discredit the Church and its history through gross and absurd manipulations," Bertone, the archbishop of the northern Italian city of Genoa and a close friend of Pope John Paul II told the paper in its Monday edition.

"This seems like a throwback to the old anti-clerical pamphlets of the 1800s," he said.

The central claim of the book, written by U.S. author Dan Brown, is that Jesus married Mary Magdalene and had children. The Bible says nothing about Jesus' marital status.

Bertone's comments were significant because until the pope named him archbishop of Genoa in 2003 he was for years the number two man at the Vatican's most powerful department -- the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

"You can find that book everywhere and the risk is that many people who read it believe that those fairy tales are real," he said. "I think I have the responsibility to clear things up to unmask the cheap lies contained in books like that."
Holy grail

A central storyline of the book is that the Holy Grail is not the cup which Christ is said to have used at the Last Supper but really the bloodline descended from Jesus and Mary Magdalene. Bertone calls this idea "a perversion."

Bertone is so incensed about the novel that he will be the key speaker at a roundtable in Genoa on Wednesday night attempting to dismantle the book, which also accuses the Church of covering up the female role in Christianity.

"I will try to clear things up and help form consciences," the cardinal said.

"I think that when faced with affirmations that are so shameful and unfounded, readers who have even a minimum of basic (Christian) formation should react," he said.

He said it was "sad" that even Catholic bookstores were selling "The Da Vinci Code" "for purely economic reasons."

One bookstore selling "The Da Vinci Code" is the one in the Gemelli Hospital, a Catholic institution where the pope spent a total of 28 days in two stints in February and March.

In the interview, Bertone firmly rejected the book's claim that the feminine role in Christianity had been suppressed.

"This is one of the most vulgar of inventions. The feminine element is present in all the Gospels," Bertone said.

Bertone also strongly defended Opus Dei, the conservative Church organisation which the book depicts as a ruthless, Machiavellian group which resorts even to murder in its attempt to keep the Church's secrets hidden.

The novel is going to reach an even wider audience next year with the release of a film based on the book starring Tom Hanks.

Link: www.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/...code.reut/

--------------------------------------


I think that's just about the worst action the Church could ever take. Dan Brown accuse the Church and especially the Vatican, for trying to silence and cover up other perceptions of Christianity (He mostly does so in "Angels and Demons") and bang, the Vatican does exactly what he accuses it off.
I think the Church will continue to loose members, as long as it tries to avoid dialoge and discussion about such fundamental issues. The guy warning us not to read the book, will probably end up causing even more people to read it. It just shows how "out of touch" the church can be.

I personally have some issues about Dan Brown that Im not too fond of, but it's still a good read. A read that make you think, and make you interested in religion again. In Denmark, several priests holds sessions once a month, where they tell their flock about this book, how much of it they think is true etc. I think this is the way to go, embrace this book as a way to bring people back to religious topics. Don't demonize it like it has been done with other critics of Christianity.
 
Who cares if a cardinal blasts the Da Vinci Code? It never claimed to be fact, and even so, it is probably about as accurate as the religious mythology people are told to believe by the church.
 
Yeah, but since it contains some facts, people are in doubt as to how much is fact, how much is fiction and probably most importantly, how much is assumed facts.
 
it speaks badly about your religion when a work of fiction has it's leaders all riled up.
 
Perhaps the church is nervous because The Da Vinci Code is a work of fiction, that is far more convincing and coherent than the bible could ever be.
 
yeash, ifyour goign to think the church is corrupt fine, your going to attack the church, fine, but the DaVinchi code? i know you can do better than that. don't latch onto it just because it's anti-church. Bin Laden's anti-church, but that doesn't mean you should start believeing facts that aren't real just because you believe their message
 
That is sad that they are so insecure about their church that they go out of their way to denounce fiction that speaks against it. It has already turned away one person. *raises hand and points to self*
 
The story is faction however the author does say that all the info in the book is true.

very good read I must admit. can't wait for the movie
 
ybbor said:
yeash, ifyour goign to think the church is corrupt fine, your going to attack the church, fine, but the DaVinchi code? i know you can do better than that. don't latch onto it just because it's anti-church. Bin Laden's anti-church, but that doesn't mean you should start believeing facts that aren't real just because you believe their message

I am not latching onto it. I am just saying perhaps the church feels threatened, because so little of its beliefs are based in fact, so something like the Da Vinci Code is a serious challenge to it.
 
20 million copies and 2 years too late, methinks.
 
Wait a sec, didn't Mary, who is still a Virgin somehow, even after she had a kid, give birth to Jesus Christ? Is this book implying that Jesus had sex with his not-so-virgin mom, the Virgin Mary? Or are my facts completely messed up?
 
Sobieski II said:
Perhaps the church is nervous because The Da Vinci Code is a work of fiction, that is far more convincing and coherent than the bible could ever be.
The problem is that the Da Vinci Code is full of utter crap and is not coherent or convincing at all to anyone who tries to check it out. My newspaper even ran an article on how the French dislike the gross inaccuracies. Unfortunately, many people are far too lazy to actually check it at all. So I believe the Church is quite right in denouncing this if it will either get people to check the facts, or keep the book out of the hands of the stupid and lazy.
 
A faith that cannot tolerate different ideas is a dead faith.

.
 
Sobieski II said:
Who cares if a cardinal blasts the Da Vinci Code? It never claimed to be fact, and even so, it is probably about as accurate as the religious mythology people are told to believe by the church.
Dan Brown claims it's ALL fact.

All the conspiracies, all the societie, all the rituals.:p

And the cardinal is right when he says it feels as if the "anti-popery" pamphlets of the 18th and 19th century are back.
That's and old and rich protestant vein and Dan Brown and all the conspiracy theorists before him have tapped into that.
 
The Last Conformist said:
The most vitriolic hater of the DaVinci Code I know is my brother, a staunch atheist.

I've not read the book myself. From what I've heard of it, I suspect I'd hate it.
I think you are right in your suspicion.
As far as I am concerned it is only thanks to the existence of "Atlas Shrugged" that this one avoids first place on my worst book ever list. :mad:
And I am also an atheist.
 
RealGoober said:
Wait a sec, didn't Mary, who is still a Virgin somehow, even after she had a kid, give birth to Jesus Christ? Is this book implying that Jesus had sex with his not-so-virgin mom, the Virgin Mary? Or are my facts completely messed up?

They are.
Jesus Mother was wife of Joseph. In fact the bible doesn't claim the vigin birht. Jesus adressed God often as "my father in heaven". If he'd have only one father, why this phrase? Father would be certain enough than.
But because Joseph was his biological father this differencation was needed.
Furthermore it is about a mistake in translation. I do not remember a correct term but IIRC it is written Maria was free from sin- not that she actually was a virgin.
Laying with a husband and being fertile isn't considered a sin even in ultra-hardcore-orthodox-catholic circles.

There are some "Marys" in the Bible. Another one is Maria from Magdala, a fishers village near lake Genezareth. She seems to be a very independent and wealthy person, following Jesus and supporting him in any way. Their true relation is really like a riddle. She is named apostel of the apostles because she was the first to get aware about Jesus' ressuraction. Unlike the others she believed without a further prove but told the apostels about it.

There is some speculations about how close she's towards Jesus. Some documents also mentioned in da Vinci code, like the evangleium of thomas say that Jesus kissed her on her mouth and that he loved her differently or more than his male followers. Not like a sister than?

I think catholiscsm is mainly afraid about questions concerning some of their weird dogmas as the virgin birth.
Furthermore it gets more and more abvious, that the history of Christianism is not without contradictions and that from the very beginning there were different interpetations about the meaning of Jesus role and his evangelium.

The catholic church was just more harsh suppressing opponents and were substantially supported by Konstantin- who himself was less holy than presumed but a real Cesar with no scruples to do the neccessary in order to preserve his power. Ironically he was babtised already close to agony and there's a rumour that he was bebtised only because he couldn't abject anymore.
But due to his support Catholicism got the main power inside Christianism and were blaming every other group heretics.
The bible as we know today is also a choice of books which had been made around the concillium of Nazäa IIRC. The others were perfectly hidden and FORBIDDEN until the discovery of those books in the desert.

Gnosticism for example was named heretic because it claims gods kingdom is inside everyone and there's no real need for a church. This is of corse noo good if you want to possess the true believe only for yourself in order to keep might and power.

Maria Magdalena is presumed to have Christianised France and there are as far as I know 2 places which claim to possess their reliquies.
"Virgin" Mary shall have gone to Ephesos later on and it is said she even died there.

But it is anyway difficult to get facts out of a 2000 year old history where many documents had been hidden or even falsificated in order to
-peserve the power to the church
-kick women out of meaningful positions and suppress them
-condemn sexuality

Early day of Christianism there were female priests as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom