May be this is direction where the Dutch enslavers come from. It could be, that near Cuzco there is a strategic resource, that can be seen by the AI, but not by the human player. One thing is sure: The terrain around Cuzco in nearly all directions is the worst to defend against enslavers, as there is nearly no terrain to stop or to slow down enslavers (with the exception of the Aztec direction).
The end of Civ IV is the start of Civ III CCM.
"Rhetorical" implies that you've already tested this, and know the answer!
Yes, this is no three-pipe problem, as the answer can be found easily in Debug mod.
Assuming the special resource acts like a standard Civ3 resource, then the special-resource-requiring unit-build-in-progress should be complete-able, but no additional units of that type will be buildable afterwards (and if production is manually switched to something else after the resource is lost, it cannot then be switched back to the original unit-build).
The Flintlock mod allows both settings, to limit the special resource only to the city where the special building is located and to alternatively allow the special resource for the complete trade-net. Here Flintlock one more time has done a fantastic work!
My reflections for CCM 2.6 (and the current settings in the screenshots) are to limit the special resources only to the city with that special building in it, but may be that a GW, like the Hoover Dam, will provide the special resource electric power to the complete trade-net.
Alekseyev_ , in my eyes it makes a lot of sense to limit the production of these capital ships in general. A lot of the special effects in CCM are based on the idea, that limiting features in C3C can achieve much better results in game play (per example settlers, workers, barracks and so on). This also explains the answer to your question how the feature of special resources will be implemented in CCM: It is based as a limitation of options and not as an addition - but providing better results for the game.
it's hard or impossible to implement something army-like where you could for example only have 1 out of every 8 cities produce capital ships. if something like the city view or the palace is the reason, I (and I bet many others) could live without that, in fact I probably haven't seen the city view in more than a decade.
Agreed.
The reason is, that CCM 2.50 is created as an expansion mod of the C3C epic game. Most space in the download of C3C mods and scenarios consume the units and leaderhead graphics - but most of them in most scenarios are the same, meaning you have per example the graphics and sound files for the battleship Bismarck twice, three times or even much more in your scenarios folder, when one time in the units folder of the C3C mainfiles would be sufficient. Other mods and scenarios can use those files, as if they would have been delivered directly with C3C. They can be changed by modders in their mods and scenarios as easily as it is possible to give a unit of the C3C download a different sound in a mod or scenario.Another question for CCM: What is the reason you use a different installation method? The requirement to put it into the main folder is the only thing that has always stopped me from trying out the mod. It would be nice if you could supply a scenario-folder version with the next update.
Much too complicated.
I cannot say, when the next version will be finished. There is a lot of work to do. Changing the civilopedia entries for more than 3.000 units and many buildings is only one part of that work.
; 
; 
(etc.)\
