She's an 8-foot-tall vampire from a horror video game not based on real events, and because of that, she is not suitable as a Civ Leader.Honestly i don't know in which Civ could you put her even but can we get Lady Dimitrescu as a leader? I feel like that's important
I think if Hawaii makes it into Civ 6, they should maybe be more focus on "modernization" that the Hawaii monarchs did to mimic european influence, while retaining their Polynesian cultural roots; the Hawaii mod that is availble does a good job at that, giving the Kaimiloa unique naval unit, but maybe it would be cool if they got bonuses from settling ad building district in volcanic soil.Well I am of the opinion that Hawaii would probably need to be more wayfaring civ than the Maori which is why I don't see them, or any other Pacific Islander culture, getting in.
That being said the Maori already have pretty good tourism bonuses and sort of a pacifist strategy, at least in terms of them being the environmentalist civ, not the Haka War Dancing Toa part.
And if we are talking about a volcano bias it should go to the Maori too because Aotearoa is the home of Mt. Doom.
I love that you theorize as much as I do.
This is basically in-line with my observation that we effectively have four slots that were built out in previous games that have not returned or been replaced: Portugal, a Maghrebi civ, a western US civ, and an Italian civ.
If we ended at NFP, I believe this would be the first game in the series not to return or at least slant out/refine every region from the previous game, with the exception of the Hittites.
I'm also presuming this analysis doesn't include Gran Colombia or Vietnam? I count a total of seven ascended/unique civs, possibly six if we entertain the idea that the Mapuche are really just a heavily geographically shifted Shoshone slot.
*Naples has left the chat*
At this point it doesn't matter considering in your chart we got both Gran Colombia and Vietnam that ascended from city-states. Also where's Nubia?
I'd say there's a pretty good argument (if one wanted to make one) for balkanizing France...though I'd pick Brittany or Normandy over Aquitaine to be the one to do it. That being said, I don't think France is in urgent need of balkanization.Does that mean it can be argued that Aquitaine exists as a Civilization in the game?
in the classical era celts were hardly a cultural blob though. I doubt Boudicca and Vercingatorix would recognize each other as one and the same
not getting Afghanistan, Ghaznavids, Chola or Phillippines hurt a bit. I didn’t expect any of them, but I really wanted them
The Gauls called themselves Keltoi, and that's clearly who the Celts of Humankind are with their Gaesati and Nemeton. Also depending on whom you ask, Gaulish and Brythonic may or may not have been a dialect continuum (I lean towards not, but there is scholarship on both sides).
Isn’t the Philippines still considered SEA though? Considering we just got Vietnam from the same region feel like it’s not likely.
We already got the alternate Leader, and there's also the fact that Firaxis has a 1:3 ratio for female and male Leaders, respectively. So I don't think it's Darius, mate. Sorry.
