pre-release info Civilization VII - Content Spreadsheet Thread - Civ overview!

[stealth_nsk]

But the Ashoka himself is containing the DLC content, his persona.

Which was specifically mentioned in the video

 

[JNR13]

The personas will be available at launch though, whereas the DLC civs only arrives in the weeks after. I wouldn't doubt that we're getting Persia eventually. Maybe they want to reveal a certain number of explo civs before the stream since they will appear there. Maybe some Persian uniques or abilities aren't set yet or deal with systems meant to remain unrevealed for now.

 

[Ryansinbela]

Also we only have 9 Antiquity civs on the website

 

[JNR13]

Also we only have 9 Antiquity civs on the website

Maybe they want to keep the neat 3x3 layout for a while before ruining it with the 10th reveal.

 

[TheGhostEnthusiast]

A little off the current topic, but I think White Tower should be under Confirmed instead of Conjectured, as it's been shown by name as the Norman associated wonder (screenshot from Antiquity Age stream)

 

[Rac]

Update: Xerxes got revealed with 2 personas, same situation as Ashoka, one of the personas is a DLC, so yeah, another mention to Persia in Antiquity and that is it for today

 

[Zaarin]

Update: Xerxes got revealed with 2 personas, same situation as Ashoka, one of the personas is a DLC, so yeah, another mention to Persia in Antiquity and that is it for today

Also Persian game guide.

 

[Archanist]

Gate of All Nations is confirmed too, from the Persia Game Guide

 

[Giskler]

Our blurry Persia predictions turned out to be true

 

[Rac]

Also Persian game guide.

Wait that happened too?
UHHH cool icon

Well I don't have much time right now to update it again but you get the point

 

[Archanist]

Oh, checking the game guide now and there's no "MORE COMING SOON" under the antiquity age. Looks like we're having only 10 antiquity civs and very likely 10 (+ Shawnee) Explo and 10 Modern civs

 

[Vitruvian Guar]

I'm going to repeat my predictions made elsewhere.

We are getting Ottomans on game release as a continuation for Songhai and Abbasids. And maybe Mongols as well.

Britain is in as a continuation for Normans. Russia and Germany are out.

America doesn't have a historical route from Normans, though it has gameplay unlock.

 

[Zaarin]

America doesn't have a historical route from Normans, though it has gameplay unlock.

I think all civs will have gameplay unlocks and none will have only gameplay unlocks. America will continue from Normans and Shawnee (and maybe Hawai'i).

 

[Vitruvian Guar]

I think all civs will have gameplay unlocks and none will have only gameplay unlocks. America will continue from Normans and Shawnee (and maybe Hawai'i).

It will be considered historical path for Inca, Shawnee and Hawaii. But not Normans.

 

[Nic@Melbourne]

I'm going to repeat my predictions made elsewhere.

We are getting Ottomans on game release as a continuation for Songhai and Abbasids. And maybe Mongols as well.

Britain is in as a continuation for Normans. Russia and Germany are out.

America doesn't have a historical route from Normans, though it has gameplay unlock.

Agree Abbasid goes to Ottoman.
Monogol can probably choose the same under the human player but they still need their own line for the AI, who would it be if not Russia?

 

[Krikkit1]

Agree Abbasid goes to Ottoman.
Monogol can probably choose the same under the human player but they still need their own line for the AI, who would it be if not Russia?

Mongol would go equally to Russia, Mughal and Qing

 

[Xandinho]

I'm going to repeat my predictions made elsewhere.

We are getting Ottomans on game release as a continuation for Songhai and Abbasids. And maybe Mongols as well.

Britain is in as a continuation for Normans. Russia and Germany are out.

America doesn't have a historical route from Normans, though it has gameplay unlock.

The problem is that we haven't seen anything that hints at the Ottomans so far. We haven't seen architecture, a possible associated wonder, simply nothing. I think, at this point, if they were included, we would have seen something by now. Which is a shame, because they are a very fitting transition from the Abbasids, who, without them, will likely have to go to the Mughals.

 

[Alexander's Hetaroi]

The problem is that we haven't seen anything that hints at the Ottomans so far. We haven't seen architecture, a possible associated wonder, simply nothing. I think, at this point, if they were included, we would have seen something by now. Which is a shame, because they are a very fitting transition from the Abbasids, who, without them, will likely have to go to the Mughals.

Even if they aren't in the base game, I predict they will come soon. At least "Crossroad of the World" screams Ottomans, and potentially Byzantium, to me.
Then again, we got several warmongers in the Great Negotiator's leader DLC, so who knows?

 

[Zaarin]

Even if they aren't in the base game, I predict they will come soon. At least "Crossroad of the World" screams Ottomans, and potentially Byzantium, to me.
Then again, we got several warmongers in the Great Negotiator's leader DLC, so who knows?

I actually expect Ottomans and Byzantium in Right to Rule potentially--I think Crossroads of the World will have the civs with wonders already in the game (Goths, Assyria, Silla, and...I'm sure I'm forgetting someone--probably not Teotihuacan, Temple of the Sun notwithstanding).

 

[Alexander's Hetaroi]

--I think Crossroads of the World will have the civs with wonders already in the game (Goths, Assyria, Silla, and...I'm sure I'm forgetting someone--probably not Teotihuacan, Temple of the Sun notwithstanding).

Tonga was the other one.