Mott1
King
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2006
- Messages
- 742
Its pretty ironic how the Liberal students at Columbia are self proclaimed advocates of freedom of speech, yet they resort to violence and suppress the freedom of speech when they encounter speech they don't agree with. Like at the Minuteman presentation. What is absurd is that they claim they did it in the name of freedom of speech.
This was a statement from the "stage-stormers" that was released shortly after the event, its pathetic how this liberal mob see themselves as the victims:
These idiot students think that just by allowing the Minutemen to briefly take the podium and then storming the stage is an exercise of freedom of speech.
Take a look at the video and see how they "peacfully" occupied the stage.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfnn7wTgoE8
The writer goes on to say: "The Minutemen are not a legitimate voice in the debate on immigration."
This statement is an example of rampant student elitism that is the product of biased liberal education. Who is this chump that thinks he can decide who is the legitimate voice and whose not in the debate on immigration!?
He further states: "They [Minutemen] are a racist, armed militia who have declared open hunting season on immigrants, causing countless hate crimes and over 3000 deaths on the border."
Funny, the Minutemen consists of people from all walks of life. Whites, blacks and yes, even Mexicans.
Their punishment for storming the stage and assaulting the Minutemen speakers? "a slap on the wrist."
Monique Dols, who was one of the stage stormers, said the light punishment was a "victory for free speech and anti-racism." What kind of indoctrinantion is responsible for this type of deranged reasoning?
This is Dols understanding of "anti-racism":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEPldqsXbrk

This was a statement from the "stage-stormers" that was released shortly after the event, its pathetic how this liberal mob see themselves as the victims:
We celebrate free speech: for that reason we allowed the Minutemen
to speak, and for that same reason we peacefully occupied the stage and
spoke ourselves. Our peaceful protest was violently attacked by
members of the College Republicans and their supporters, who are the
very same people who invited the Minutemen to our campus in the
first place. The Minutemen are not a legitimate voice in the debate on
immigration. They are a racist, armed militia who have declared
open hunting season on immigrants, causing countless hate crimes and over
3000 deaths on the border. Why should exploitative corporations have
free passes between nations, but individual people not? No human
being is illegal.
These idiot students think that just by allowing the Minutemen to briefly take the podium and then storming the stage is an exercise of freedom of speech.
Take a look at the video and see how they "peacfully" occupied the stage.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfnn7wTgoE8
The writer goes on to say: "The Minutemen are not a legitimate voice in the debate on immigration."
This statement is an example of rampant student elitism that is the product of biased liberal education. Who is this chump that thinks he can decide who is the legitimate voice and whose not in the debate on immigration!?
He further states: "They [Minutemen] are a racist, armed militia who have declared open hunting season on immigrants, causing countless hate crimes and over 3000 deaths on the border."
Funny, the Minutemen consists of people from all walks of life. Whites, blacks and yes, even Mexicans.
Their punishment for storming the stage and assaulting the Minutemen speakers? "a slap on the wrist."
A number of students who rushed the stage during Minuteman Project founder Jim Gilchrist’s Oct. 4 speech at Columbia received letters yesterday informing them that they would be punished with “disciplinary warnings” for their conduct at the event.
Three students-one of whom received the verdict more than a month ago-confirmed yesterday that they were charged with simple violations of the University’s Rules of Conduct. The resulting warnings, which will be notated on students’ transcripts and remain there until the end of 2008, are the lowest of four possible outcomes for those found to be in violation of the rules. Disciplinary warnings place no financial or academic constraints on the person charged and state “that future violations will be treated more seriously.”
“It’s a light punishment, it’s a slap on the wrist,” Monique Dols, GS, who was given a disciplinary warning, said. “It’s a victory for free speech and anti-racism.”…
[One] student, Andrew Tillet-Saks, CC ‘09 was also found to have engaged “in conduct that places another in danger of bodily harm.”…
“I’m glad they [the Minutemen] are outraged. They get press from whining, but an impression of strength is more important in the long run for a vigilante group which thrives on intimidating immigrants, and this verdict, like the protest, helps subvert that,” Judd said.
http://media.www.columbiaspectator....es.Protestors.slap.On.The.Wrist-2793565.shtml
Monique Dols, who was one of the stage stormers, said the light punishment was a "victory for free speech and anti-racism." What kind of indoctrinantion is responsible for this type of deranged reasoning?
This is Dols understanding of "anti-racism":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEPldqsXbrk