Design flaws

To show there are design flaws you need to show how you would improve it.

That's trivially easy:

If Humans Were Built to Last

screen-shot-2010-02-24-at-12-49-36-pm.png


screen-shot-2010-02-24-at-12-49-50-pm.png


screen-shot-2010-02-24-at-12-50-02-pm.png


screen-shot-2010-02-24-at-12-51-02-pm.png
 
<nvm>
 
To show there are design flaws you need to show how you would improve it.

Generally speaking, if a design is obviously flawed, you do not need to show how to improve it. However, this is all in good fun, so......

The Designer had to complete His work in six days. What else do you expect?
 
In spite of the findings, Professor Bill Parker says that this does not mean we should cling onto our appendices at all costs.

&#8220;It&#8217;s very important for people to understand that if their appendix gets inflamed, just because it has a function it does not mean they should try to keep it in,&#8221; he explained.

&#8220;So it&#8217;s sort of a fun thing that we&#8217;ve found, but we don&#8217;t want it to cause any harm, we don&#8217;t want people to say, &#8216;oh, my appendix has a function&#8217;, so I&#8217;m not going to go to the doctor, I&#8217;m going to try to hang onto it.&#8221;

just because it has a function doesn't mean it's a good design
 
Do you mean that? Don't you mean "doesn't mean it isn't a horrible design"?

But I was picking up on the usual theme that the appendix doesn't have a function. You may not have meant that in the first place. You weren't that explicit about it.
 
As far as I know the maximum human lifespan hasn't changed much in the last 15,000 years. Or so. Historically very few people attained that maximum, mainly due to infectious diseases. But I think they could.

But who do you mean by our oldest ancestors?

One of these?
images


Of one of these?
400px-Celltypes.svg.png


So, the answer to your question seems to be yes and no. At some stage in the evolution of human beings, the maximum life span might well have been more or less 35.

35 I think is the average lifespan, which is brought down by infant mortality. According to Wikipedia (of course, it is Wikipedia) the average was actually 40-50 if you survived childhood in antiquity and 60 in Medieval Britain.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy
 
Do you mean that? Don't you mean "doesn't mean it isn't a horrible design"?

But I was picking up on the usual theme that the appendix doesn't have a function. You may not have meant that in the first place. You weren't that explicit about it.

thanks, fixed.

yea i know the appendix has some sort of function. but it isn't worth however many people getting appendicitis.
 
:lol:

Okay, how about the shift in the shrillness of a baby's cries after the first few weeks?

Early on, it's "wa[I'm terribly cute, and you love me, and I'm uncomfortable], wa, wa"

Later on, it's "WAAAA [Dance to my tune! There's NOTHING, NOTHING you can do to get me to stop] WAAAAA'

During that early stage, I'm totally happy to help Jr. out. He'll keep crying until I figure it out, but it ain't bad, I can deal. That later stage? OMG. Give him to Mom, and use all your willpower to not suggest locking him in the furthest room of the house until he cries himself to sleep.
Mine is that age now. I changed the words to "Mockingbird" to include the phrase "and if you don't behave, Daddy'll bury you in a shallow grave." She's killing me.
 
35 I think is the average lifespan, which is brought down by infant mortality. According to Wikipedia (of course, it is Wikipedia) the average was actually 40-50 if you survived childhood in antiquity and 60 in Medieval Britain.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy

I imagine there would be peaks in mortality for the very young and the somewhat old; both of which can be dealt with somewhat by modern medicine. If you got cancer even a few decades ago, you were almost certain to die; if you had a heart attack, nobody could resuscitate you, and so on. The ailments which we've historically chalked up to 'old people dying' are actually largely treatable.
 
Mine is that age now. I changed the words to "Mockingbird" to include the phrase "and if you don't behave, Daddy'll bury you in a shallow grave." She's killing me.

Yeah, it actually really confuses me. The early stage is so much easier to care for, morale-wise. To be utterly serious, I think that's where shaken-baby syndrome comes from.
 
Yeah, it actually really confuses me. The early stage is so much easier to care for, morale-wise. To be utterly serious, I think that's where shaken-baby syndrome comes from.
You're not wrong. My wife read a study last week which concluded that it is this present age group that is most commonly associated with shaken-baby syndrome. The parents simply snap after hours of non-stop screaming for no discernible reason.
 
Back
Top Bottom