Differences between Chinese and Western education systems

Mathematicians formulate new conjectures and establish their truth by rigorous deduction from appropriately chosen axioms and definitions.

Which part of that is confusing?

Are you one of those "no science for deduction" guys? ;)
 
Scientific method refers to bodies of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning. A scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.


How does that apply to mathematics? It does apply to applied maths of course, but that is probably better classified as physics.
 
I think the biggest difference between the American System and other systems (including Western European ones) is the answer "who gets educated?"

The US Education system is dedicated to the idea that *everybody* should be educated. Other systems believe that only X% should.

I think the two systems are awfully apples and oranges, since they are clearly meant to do two different things. Totally switching the American educational system with say, the Chinese model, would do little to fix some of the biggest problems with the US.

The American system, for being as maligned as it is, does several things exceptionally well.

Bolded part false. The US educational system has abandoned the poor.
 
How does that apply to mathematics? It does apply to applied maths of course, but that is probably better classified as physics.
Applied math still isn't physics or a science because math is merely a tool, not the subject itself.
 
Scientific method refers to bodies of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning. A scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.


How does that apply to mathematics? It does apply to applied maths of course, but that is probably better classified as physics.
Scholarly articles for mathematics and scientific method
Method, model, and matter - Bunge - Cited by 123
A case history in scientific method - Skinner - Cited by 279
A new nonconforming approach to domain decomposition: ... - Bernardi - Cited by 589


Search ResultsHighlighting the Scientific Method through Mathematics Problems.

Other advantages to modeling the scientific method in mathematics are identified as the analogy between the processes used in certain mathematical problems ...
www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED276443 - 30k - Cached - Similar pages
by WA McGalliard Jr - 1986
[PDF] SCIENTIFIC METHODFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
2002-2003. A guide to teaching students the scientific method using the .... Mathematics is important in all aspects of scientific inquiry. ...
www.eia.doe.gov/kids/classactivities/EnergyFair2002.pdf - Similar pages
Mathematics rediscovers the scientific method - The InquirerMathematics rediscovers the scientific method. In open source software .... Maybe he messed up in mathematics at school so badly that he's got no sense on ...
www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/269/1008269/mathematics-rediscovers-scientific - 73k - Cached - Similar pages
Teaching Mathematics to Biology Majors Using the Scientific Method A major challenge exists for many college biology departments. How can their majors take all the necessary biology courses as well as complete the ...
www.allacademic.com/meta/p275449_index.html - 27k - Cached - Similar pages
Call Center Mathematics - A scientific method for understanding ...Jan 2, 2007 ... This book explains all generic aspects of call and contact centers, from the basic Erlang formula to advanced topics such as skill-based ...
www.freetechbooks.com/call-center-m...derstanding-and-improving-contact-centers-t47... - 29k - Cached - Similar pages
Scientific Method.Some people speak of the "scientific method" as a set of "rules" for doing ..... Mathematics cannot discover new scientific truths, but as we develop ...
www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/philosop/method.htm - 22k - Cached - Similar pages
Call Center Mathematics: A Scientific Method for Understanding and ...This paper helps the person who is dedicated to improving call center performance. It offers a scientific method to understanding and improving call centers ...
whitepapers.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=238848 - 55k - Cached - Similar pages
The Scientific MethodFeb 27, 2001 ... The scientific method is an organized way to investigate something we ... http://www.math.uic.edu/oprf/science/mccarron/tank/scimeth.html ...
www.math.uic.edu/~mccarron/tank/scimeth.html - 3k - Cached - Similar pages
[PDF] Call Center MathematicsFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
Call Center Mathematics. A scientific method for understanding and improving contact centers. Ger Koole. Version of January 26, 2007 ...
www.math.vu.nl/~koole/ccmath/book.pdf - Similar pages
by G Koole - Cited by 11 - Related articles - All 5 versions
Mathematics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The mathematician Benjamin Peirce called mathematics "the science that draws .... the objection that mathematics does not use the scientific method. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics - 144k - Cached - Similar pages
Book results for mathematics and scientific method
Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the ... - by Henry H Bauer - 196 pages
Scientific Method in Practice - by Hugh G Gauch - 458 pages
The World of Mathematics - by James Roy Newman - 484 pages
Try google maybe?

Applied math still isn't physics or a science because math is merely a tool, not the subject itself.
Then what's a mathematician? A hammer swinger?
 
Well we were taught Newtonian mechanics and relativity as part of our applied maths course which I consider physics.

Stuff like differential equations and numerical methods are just tools though, I agree.

It's as if ecofarm thinks mathematicians go through numbers like this:

1+2 = 3
2+1 = 3
1+3 = 4
3+1 = 4

hmm... I think we may have some evidence that a+b=b+a here :lol:

EDIT: I see ecofarm can google though ;) Well I guess you win the thread with your incredible argument skillzors :lol:
 
Well we were taught Newtonian mechanics and relativity as part of our applied maths course which I consider physics.
The mathematical equations themselves isn't what is science in its entirety. The equations are worthless if they don't either conform to empirical reality or ain't sufficiently predictable and tested.

The equations describe the nature of physics, but they are not physics in themselves.
 
Semantics.
 
Then what's a mathematician? A hammer swinger?
More like a guy who builds hammers.

Semantics.
Do you have anything more useful to say? Yes, it's semantics, but semantics is a very important thing.
 
The word you are looking for is "arbitrary", not "abstract". You are saying that shakespeare can mean whatever you want it to mean, sure. Who cares about BS?

And this was exactly what I was talking about. In English classes, or in my English classes, which is of course what I am basing this of, Shakespeare can mean anything, and you are encourage to find what in his work what isn't actually there. This goes with your provided definition of abstract- apart from concrete realities.

As for the alphabet soup of more and more qualifiers such as "quantifiable", "metaphysical", "tangible"

maths is quantifiable

Maths is the very definition of quantifiability. To quantify is to put in terms of numbers. To show the exact value of. This is what Maths is. Finding values.

It is tangible

Maths is real and actual. It is not merely a notion. That is what I am saying. So, I have not misused the word.

as opposed to metaphysical.

Metaphysical can mean abstract, amongst other things. Again, this is what I have been saying. That Maths is not abstract, not metaphysical.

And yes, using big words makes me feel good.
 
Well, a scientific fact/theory must be falsifiable to be defined as science. A mathematical theorem cannot be found to be false, therefore it is not science. I suppose maths is a form of logic and I think logic is defined under philosophy. Btw Chinese students are besides being study fiends, also very good at spotting questions. They will preview all the past year exam questions and make a good guess on what is going to come out next. Its not a good system to reward that.
 
Well, a scientific fact/theory must be falsifiable to be defined as science. A mathematical theorem cannot be found to be false, therefore it is not science. I suppose maths is a form of logic and I think logic is defined under philosophy. Btw Chinese students are besides being study fiends, also very good at spotting questions. They will preview all the past year exam questions and make a good guess on what is going to come out next. Its not a good system to reward that.

Hey, it worked for me ;)
 
Chinese students are besides being study fiends, also very good at spotting questions. They will preview all the past year exam questions and make a good guess on what is going to come out next. Its not a good system to reward that.

This is not a Chinese thing. My teachers tell me to do this, and we constantly practice past papers, to know what type of questions to expect. And it worked exceptionally well for me.
 
This is not a Chinese thing. My teachers tell me to do this, and we constantly practice past papers, to know what type of questions to expect. And it worked exceptionally well for me.

Yeah, thats just normal for tests. It worked particularly well for me in one class at uni, where the paper was identical to the one from the previous year :lol:
 
While I believe that most westerners need to study harder and stop resting on their laurels, I would not overly tout the eastern education systems. Overloading students with work can lead to simple "survival mode" memorization where one simply remembers what they must to pass a test, then promptly forgets it all to memorize for the next test.

Asian students I know do tend to value education and they are bound to do well, but it isn't because of all the material beat into their heads when they were 12. Sure they "learned" calculus when they were in their diapers but they don't remember it. I find they don't pick up things in university any faster than the western educated-students. If anything it is the other way around; the westerners are better with creativity and problem-solving, whereas the Asian (educated) students are in grade-survival-mode-memorization. The reason they are so ubiquitous in western universities is because they VALUE education, but you can VALUE education without being beaten into studying stuff as a child that you are too fatigued to really absorb.

I am pretty sure the Finns do just as well in maths as the Koreans, but they don't have kids jumping off of bridges before their final exams. Canada is up there too. Westerners are lazy, but theys till manage to pick up most of the material, because the western learning process is more efficient. It turns out sleeping helps the brain learn.

America's public education system is presently FUBAR, but this wasn't always the case, and it wouldn't take THAT much reform to make it better again. Perhaps a de-emphasis on football/cheerleading (though not on exercise and sport in general) could help.

EDIT: And I would take a Hungarian math student over all of them.
 
The parents of Asian students I know tend to value education.

QFT. Generally, Asian students I associate with just follow their parents' wishes, mostly because they're strict and don't want power to escape their hands, forcing their kids to do everything they want to. While many Asians I know are burnt out, I haven't seen any whom are depressed or done any actions associated with depression.

I'm happy to report that I'm pretty much the only Asian in school who has unstrict, caring, and loving parents. They never forced me to attend any extracurricular activities, except Test Prep for an Entrance Exam and a brief 2 month course in math after I had some trouble. I've never taken piano, tennis, swimming, or violin lessons outside of school. I learned tennis and badminton out of my own free will, and am currently taking swimming.
 
Judging from my three months at a Chinese university, the stereotype that all Chinese students work hard is just nonsense. Most of the Phd students in my office didn't show up every day, and those that were there spent a lot of time playing computer games, watching movies or even napping.

Also what I heard from teachers is that Chinese kids in genereal are pretty passive in class. I can't judge this my self as most Chinese that study here have language problems, and so naturally are not as vocal as other nationalities. I didn't attend any classes in China (I did research). But it seems most kids just sit in class and accept whatever the teacher has to say, whereas western students are encouraged to ask questions; whether that is to clarify things for themselves or to point the teacher to his mistakes doesn't matter. Of course, for a Chinese pointing a teacher to a mistake would be an unacceptable affront to the harmony in the classroom.

In all, I think the Western image of the hard-working Chinese student, for a large part comes from the fact that we mostly get to see the 1% of Chinese students that are good enough to go abroad. 1% of all Chinese students is still a very large number though.
 
The typical Chinese school day begins at 6:30 or 7:00 a.m. and ends at 5:30 p.m. There is no recess or lunch break.

The hell? Is the chinese governament composed of hopeless retards? My school day begins at 7:30 and ends at 12:00 or hereabouts. Its already THE SUCK, and then the Chinese go and try to top it in suckness? NOT EVEN A LUNCH BREAK?!

I just lost all faith in humanity.
 
Back
Top Bottom