ParkCungHee
Deity
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2006
- Messages
- 12,921
Edit: Nevermind
Or, you know, religion.*cough* bull *cough* no facts *cough* just religious crap without proper founding in logic, reason, physics, or biology.
So while the animals were on the ark, God was a literal [excrement]-handler?we have to remember that god brought all the animals to noah not the other way around. so there were some supernatural "beyond gods normal way of doings things" going on behind the scene. i hope this helps.
So while the animals were on the ark, God was a literal [excrement]-handler?
That job must suck. A few thousand years ago he created the universe, now he is shoveling elephant crap.
So God was still a [excrement]-handler then.Well, he could have just spoke to it and made it disappear, I don't know.
Well, he could have just spoke to it and made it disappear, I don't know.
It seems like whenever I find something out, there is always someone who says that everyone knows it's wrong and that I'm an idiot for ever thing that it could be right, and then say what the right thing is, and then when I think that's the right thing, someone then says I'm an idiot for ever thinking that was right, and that the thing I found out first is the right thing. I guess I should learn to accept that I'm always wrong about everything and that I'll always be stupid and hated by everyone.
It did. That dome of water was where much of the Flood water came from.
So God was still a [excrement]-handler then.
Is there any biblical evidence for your position? Or are you relying on tradition?
Okay, but going back to Noah's ark:I am guessing. I have no idea.
John Woodmorappe two B.A. degrees and an M.A. in geologyThe danger of toxic or explosive manure gases, such as methane, would be alleviated by the constant movement of the Ark, which would have allowed manure gases to be constantly released. Secondly, methane, which is half the density of air, would quickly find its way out of a small opening such as a window. There is no reason to believe that the levels of these gases within the Ark would have approached hazardous levels.
Alternatively, sloped floors would have allowed the waste to flow into large central gutters. Noahs family could have then dumped this overboard without an excessive expenditure of manpower
[Citation Needed]there is plenty of modern evidence to suggest that Noah had the know how to accomplish this.
Not really. Do you think primitives could have built Notre Dame?look at how greeks and romans built incredible structures like aqueducts and that knowledge was lost to medieval Europe.
Next time read your own source:the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazca_Lines which could only be made if they used some type of flight
Researcher Joe Nickell of the University of Kentucky has reproduced the figures by using tools and technology available to the Nazca people. The National Geographic called his work "remarkable in its exactness" when compared to the actual lines.[3] With careful planning and simple technologies, a small team of people could recreate even the largest figures within days, without any aerial assistance.[4] Most of the lines form a trench about six inches deep.
Okay, but going back to Noah's ark:
Can you tell me what the original dog brought onto Noah's ark was? Or did that dog die out as it was unable to adapt to the changes in the enviroment?
When did the great flood occur according to the bible?all dogs come from one wolf kind even the biased wiki confirms this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subspecies_of_Canis_lupus
You take such pride in being wrong. Have you ever considered running for governor of Alaska?Yep, and proud of it!
Young Earth Creationism is an idiotic belief which demonstrates an extreme level of credulity and scientific ignorance on the part of the believer. There has never been a single solitary shred of evidence to support it, and there is evidence against it in every field of science.I really should report this as a personal insult. But instead I'll let you defend that.
Thread over!@Ziggy- Well then, I admit you are correct. It is impossible to prove Creationism.
I am guessing. I have no idea.